Specificity of Atmospheric Correction of Satellite Data on Ocean Color in the Far East
- 3 Downloads
Calculation errors in ocean-brightness coefficients in the Far Eastern are analyzed for two atmospheric correction algorithms (NIR and MUMM). The daylight measurements in different water types show that the main error component is systematic and has a simple dependence on the magnitudes of the coefficients. The causes of the error behavior are considered. The most probable explanation for the large errors in ocean-color parameters in the Far East is a high concentration of continental aerosol absorbing light. A comparison between satellite and in situ measurements at AERONET stations in the United States and South Korea has been made. It is shown the errors in these two regions differ by up to 10 times upon close water turbidity and relatively high aerosol optical-depth computation precision in the case of using the NIR correction of the atmospheric effect.
Keywordssatellite remote sensing atmospheric correction AERONET ocean coloring
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Aleksanin, A.I., Kachur, V.A., and Salyuk, P.A., Processing of measurements by the ASD hyperspectroradiometer ASD for verifying satellite estimates of oceanic bioparameters, Sovremennye metody i sredstva okeanologicheskikh issledovanii: Mat. XIII Mezhdun. nauch.-tekh. konf. “MSOI-2013" (Modern Methods and Tools of Oceanographic Studies: Proceedings of the XIII International Scientific and Technical Conference “MSOI-2013”), Moscow: APR, 2013, pp. 96–100.Google Scholar
- Gordon, H.R. and Voss, K.J., MODIS normalized waterleaving radiance. Algorithm theoretical basis document (MOD 18). Version 5, Department of Physics, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, 2004.Google Scholar
- Goyens, C., Jamet, C., and Ruddick, K., A hybrid MUMM NIR corrected algorithm for the atmospheric correction of turbid waters, in Abstracts of the First International Ocean Colour Science Meeting 2013, Darmstadt, Germany, 2013, pp. 105–106. http://iocs.ioccg.org/wp-content/uploads/all-abstracts-alphabetical-order.pdf.Google Scholar
- Kopelevich, O.V., Burenkov, V.I., and Sheberstov, S.V., Development and use of regional algorithms for calculating of bio–optical characteristics of Russian seas from satellite color scan data, Sovrem. Probl. Distantsionnogo Zondirovaniya Zemli Kosmosa, 2006. T. 2. S. 99–105.Google Scholar
- Korchemkina, E.N., Shibanov, E.B., and Li, M.E., Improved techniques of atmospheric correction for remote investigations of coastal areas of the Black Sea, Issled. Zemli Kosmosa, 2009, no. 6, pp. 24–30.Google Scholar
- Mueller, J.L., Fargion, G.S., and McClain, C.R., Ocean optics protocols for satellite ocean color sensor validation, Rev. 1., v. III: Radiometric measurements and data analysis prot. NASA/TM-2003-21641/Rev-V. Greenbelt, Maryland: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, 2003.Google Scholar
- Shtraikhert, E.A., Zakharkov, S.P., and D’yakov, S.E., Correction of satellite estimates on the basis of shipboard measurements of the chlorophyll-a concentration for the Sea of Japan, Issled. Zemli Kosmosa, 2006, no. 6, pp. 72–82.Google Scholar
- Volpe, G., Santoleri, R., Vellucci, V., Riberad’Alcalà, M., Marullo, S., and D’Ortenzio, F., The colour of the Mediterranean Sea: Global versus regional bio–optical algorithms evaluation and implication for satellite chlorophyll estimates, Remote Sens. Environ., 2007, vol. 107, pp. 625–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wang, M.H., Atmospheric correction for remotely-sensed ocean-colour products, Report of the International Ocean-Colour Coordinating Group, Dartmouth, Canada, 2010, no. 10.Google Scholar
- Zibordi, G., Holben, B., Slutsker, I., Giles, D., Alimonte, D.D., Mélin, F., Berthon, J.-F., Vandemark, D., Feng, H., Schuster, G., Fabbri, B.E., Kaitala, S., and Seppälä, J., AERONET-OC: A network for the validation of ocean color primary radiometric products, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 2009, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1634–1651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar