Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Possible causes of the underestimation of paleoclimate low-frequency variability by statistical methods

  • Published:
Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Northern Hemisphere mean surface temperature has shown a significant positive trend over the past two centuries. On the basis of the well-known reconstructions of global climate from proxy data, the conclusion is made that the current warming has been unprecedented during at least the past two millennia. On the other hand, it was demonstrated in [6] that the existing statistical models strongly underestimate the low-frequency variability of global annual mean temperature, thus making the conclusion drawn above questionable. At present, the results of [6] are interpreted as evidence that the Mann reconstruction is invalid [1]. To our knowledge, however, it is too early to draw such conclusions. What is the cause of smoothing low-frequency variability? To what extent are various statistical models used for paleoclimate reconstruction that is subject to this effect? To answer these questions, numerical experiments are performed with data sets of annual mean surface temperature over the past millennium that are simulated with the ECHO-G coupled ocean-atmosphere general circulation model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. E. Mann, R. S. Bradley, and M. K. Hughest, “Global-Scale Temperature Patterns and Climate Forcing over the Past Six Centuries,” Nature 392, 779–787 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. E. Mann, R. S. Bradley, and M. K. Hughest, “Northern Hemisphere Temperatures During the Past Millennium: Inferences, Uncertainties, and Limitations,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 26, 759–762 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. P. D. Jones, K. R. Briffa, T. P. Barnett, and S. Tett, “High-Resolution Paleoclimatic Records for the Last Millennium: Interpretation, Integration and Comparison with General Circulation Model Control Run Temperatures,” The Holocene 8, 455–471 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. K. R. Briffa, “Annual Climate Variability in the Holocene: Interpreting the Message of Ancient Trees,” Quatern. Sci. Rev. 19, 87–105 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. R. McKitrick and S. McIntyre, “Corrections to the Mann et al. (1998) Proxy Data Base and Northern Hemispheric Average Temperature Series,” Energy Environ. 14, 751–771 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Storch, E. Zorita, J. Jones, et al., “Reconstructing Past Climate from Noisy Data,” Science 306, 679–682 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. E. Zorita, F. Gonzalez-Rouco, and S. Legutke, “Testing the Mann et al. (1998) Approach to Paleoclimate Reconstructions in the Context of a 1000-yr Control Simulation with the ECHO-G Coupled Climate Model,” J. Clim. 16, 1378–1390 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. D. Jones and M. E. Mann, “Climate over Past Millennia,” Rev. Geophys. 42, doi:10.1029/2003RG000143 (2004).

  9. A. I. Chavro and V. P. Dymnikov, Methods of Mathematical Statistics in Atmospheric Physics (IVM RAN, Moscow, 2000) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. M. Oboukhov, “On Statistical Orthogonal Expansions of Empirical Functions,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Geofiz., No. 3, 432–439 (1960).

  11. E. V. Dmitriev, “Analysis of Methods for Processing Proxi Measurements of Geophysical Quantities and Estimating Errors in Their Interpretation,” Inform.-Izmerit. Upravl. Sist. 2(5), 12–22 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yu. P. Pyt’ev and A. I. Chulichkov, “Recurrent Techniques of Measurement Reduction,” Mat. Model. 1(8), 22–44 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. I. Chavro and E. V. Dmitriev, “Statistical Model for Reconstruction of the Regional Structure of Geophysical Fields,” Meteorol. Gidrol., No. 6, 39–49 (2002).

  14. M. E. Mann and S. Rutherford, “Climate Reconstruction Using ‘Pseudoproxies’,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, 1391–1394 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S. G. Dobrovol’skii, Climatic Changes in the Hydrosphere-Atmosphere System (Geos, Moscow, 2002) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Moberg, D. M. Sonechkin, K. Holmgren, et al., “Highly Variable Northern Hemisphere Temperatures Reconstructed from Low-and High-Resolution Proxy Data,” Nature 433, 613–617 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Numerical Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Gubkina 8, Moscow, 119991, Russia

    E. V. Dmitriev & A. I. Chavro

Authors
  1. E. V. Dmitriev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. I. Chavro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Original Russian Text © E.V. Dmitriev, A.I. Chavro, 2006, published in Izvestiya AN. Fizika Atmosfery i Okeana, 2006, Vol. 42, No. 5, pp. 637–649.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dmitriev, E.V., Chavro, A.I. Possible causes of the underestimation of paleoclimate low-frequency variability by statistical methods. Izv. Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 42, 586–597 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433806050057

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433806050057

Keywords

Search

Navigation