Skip to main content
Log in

The quantum poisson-Lie T-duality and mirror symmetry

  • Nuclei, Particles, and Their Interaction
  • Published:
Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Poisson-Lie T-duality in quantum N=2 superconformal Wess-Zumino-Novikov-Witten models is considered. The Poisson-Lie T-duality transformation rules of the super-Kac-Moody algebra currents are found from the conjecture that, as in the classical case, the quantum Poisson-Lie T-duality transformation is given by an automorphism which interchanges the isotropic subalgebras of the underlying Manin triple in one of the chirality sectors of the model. It is shown that quantum Poisson-Lie T-duality acts on the N=2 super-Virasoro algebra generators of the quantum models as a mirror symmetry acts: in one of the chirality sectors it is a trivial transformation while in another chirality sector it changes the sign of the U(1) current and interchanges the spin-3/2 currents. A generalization of Poisson-Lie T-duality for the quantum Kazama-Suzuki models is proposed. It is shown that quantum Poisson-Lie T-duality acts in these models as a mirror symmetry also.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Giveon, M. Porrati, and E. Rabinovici, Phys. Rep. 244, 79 (1994).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. E. Alvarez, L. Alvarez-Gaume, and Y. Lozano, preprint CERN-TH. 7486/94, E-print archives hep-th/9410237.

  3. In Essays on Mirror Manifolds, ed. by S. T. Yau, International Press, Hong Kong (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. R. Morrison and M. R. Plesser, Nucl. Phys. B 440, 279 (1995).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. V. Batyrev and L. A. Borisov, E-print archives alg-geom/9412017.

  6. D. R. Morrison and M. R. Plesser, E-print archives hep-th/9508107.

  7. B. R. Greene and M. R. Plesser, Nucl. Phys. B 338, 15 (1990).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Cappelli, C. Itzykson and J.-B. Zuber, Nucl. Phys. B 280, 445 (1987).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. B. Greene, E-print archives hep-th/9702155.

  10. A. Strominger, S-T. Yau, and E. Zaslow, E-print archives hep-th/9606040.

  11. C. Klimcik and P. Severa, Phys. Lett. B 351, 455 (1995).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. X. De la Ossa and F. Quevedo, Nucl. Phys. B 403, 377 (1993).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Giveon and M. Rocek, Nucl. Phys. B 421, 173 (1994); E. Alvarez, L. Alvarez-Gaume, and Y. Lozano, Phys. Lett. B 336, 183 (1994);A.Giveon, E. Rabinovici, and G. Veneziano, Nucl. Phys. B 322, 167 (1989).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. B. E. Fridling and A. Jevicki, Phys. Lett. B 134, 70 (1984); E. S. Fradkin and A. A. Tseytlin, Ann. Phys. 162, 31 (1985); T. Curtright and C. Zachos, Phys. Rev. D 49, 5408 (1994); T. Curtright and C. Zachos, Phys. Rev. D 52, R573 (1995).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. V. G. Drinfield, in Proc. Int. Cong. Math., Berkley, Calif. (1986), p. 798.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. Klimcik and P. Severa, Preprint CERN-TH/95-330, E-print archives hep-th/9512040; C. Klimcik and P. Severa, Preprint CERN-TH/96-142, E-print archives hep-th/9605212; C. Klimcik and P. Severa, Preprint IHES/P/96/70. E-print archives hep-th/9610198; C. Klimcik, Preprint IHES/P/97/58, E-print archives hep-th/9707194.

  17. C. Klimcik and P. Severa, Preprint CERN-TH/96-254, E-print archives hep-th/9609112.

  18. C. Klimcik and P. Severa, Preprint CERN-TH/95-339, E-print archives hep-th/9512124.

  19. E. Tyurin and R. von Unge, E-print archives hep-th/9512025.

  20. K. Sfetsos, Preprint THU-96/38, E-print archives hep-th/9611199.

  21. K. Sfetsos, E-print archives hep-th/9710163.

  22. K. Sfetsos, E-print archives hep-th/9803019.

  23. S. E. Parkhomenko, JETP Lett. 64, 877 (1996); S. E. Parkhomenko, Preprint Landau TMP/12/96, E-print archives hep-th/9612034.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. S. E. Parkhomenko, Preprint Landau TMP/05/97, E-print archives hep-th/9705233.

  25. S. E. Parkhomenko, Nucl. Phys. B 510, 623 (1998).

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. S. E. Parkhomenko, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 13, 1041 (1998).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. J. Balog, P. Forgas, M. Mohammedi, L. Palla, and J. Schnittger, E-print archives hep-th/9806068.

  28. A. Giveon and E. Witten, Preprint IASSNS-HEP-94/30, R1-157-93, E-print archives hep-th/9404184.

  29. A. Giveon and E. Kiritsis, Nucl. Phys. B 411, 487 (1994).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. P. DI Veccia, V. G. Knizhnik, J. L. Petersen, and P. Rossi, Nucl. Phys. B 253, 701 (1985).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ph. Spindel, A. Sevrin, W. Troost, and A. van Proeyen, Nucl. Phys. B 308, 662 (1988); Nucl. Phys. B 311, 465 (1988/89).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. S. E. Parkhomenko, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 102, 3 (1992) [Sov. Phys. JETP 85, 1 (1992)].

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. S. E. Parkhomenko, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 11, 445 (1996).

    ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. M. A. Semenov-Tian-Shansky, RIMS, Kyoto Univ. 21, 1237 (1985). Vol. 21.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. A. Yu. Alekseev and A. Z. Malkhin, Commun. Math. Phys. 162, 147 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. J.-H. Lu and A. Weinstein, J. Diff. Geom. 31, 501 (1990).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. A. Yu. Alekseev and I. T. Todorov, Nucl. Phys. B 421, 413 (1994).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. E. Getzler, Preprint MIT (1994).

  39. S. Nam, Phys. Lett. B 187, 340 (1987); E. B. Kiritsis and G. Siopsis, Phys. Lett. B 184, 353 (1987).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Y. Kazama and H. Suzuki, Nucl. Phys. B 321, 232 (1989).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. C. Schweigert, Commun. Math. Phys. 149, 425 (1992).

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. C. M. Hull and B. Spence, Preprint QMC/PH/89/24 (1989).

  43. K. Gawedski and A. Kupiainen, Nucl. Phys. B 320, 625 (1989).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. N. Ohta and H. Suzuki, Preprint OS-GE 01-89 (1989).

  45. M. Henningson, Nucl. Phys. B 423, 631 (1994).

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. E. Kiritsis, E-print archives hep-th/9406082.

  47. M. Yu. Lashkevich, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 8, 5673 (1993); Mod. Phys. Lett. A 8, 851 (1993).

    ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  48. D. Gepner, Nucl. Phys. B 296, 757 (1988); Phys. Lett. B 199, 380 (1987).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  49. T. Eguchi, H. Ooguri, A. Taormina and S. K. Yang, Nucl. Phys. B 315, 193 (1989): A. Taormina, Preprint CERN-TH.5409/89.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 116, 11–25 (July 1999)

Published in English in the original Russian journal. Reproduced here with stylistic changes by the Translation Editor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parkhomenko, S.E. The quantum poisson-Lie T-duality and mirror symmetry. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 89, 5–12 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1134/1.558947

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/1.558947

Keywords

Navigation