Abstract
A qualitative analysis of spin-dependent tunneling in ferromagnetic metal-insulator-ferromagnetic metal junctions is performed using the WKB approximation and a parabolic band model. It is shown that, as distinct from other tunneling characteristics, only electrons moving at large angles in the plane of the tunnel barrier contribute to the magnetoresistance. The cause of the rapid decrease in the junction magnetoresistance upon applying a bias voltage across the junction is ascertained. It is shown that this cause is attributed to the mirror character of tunneling and remains valid within the framework of more complicated models.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. Julliere, Phys. Lett. A 54, 225 (1975).
J. S. Moodera, L. R. Kinder, T. M. Wong, and R. Meservey, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3273 (1995).
J. S. Moodera, J. Nassar, and G. Mathon, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 29, 381 (1999).
W. H. Butler, X.-G. Zhang, T. C. Schulthess, and J. M. MacLaren, Phys. Rev. B 63, 054416 (2001).
C. Zhang, X.-G. Zhang, P. S. Krstić, et al., Phys. Rev. B 69, 134406 (2004).
F. Montaigne, M. Hehn, and A. Schuhl, Phys. Rev. B 64, 14402 (2001).
A. H. Davies and J. M. MacLarren, J. Appl. Phys. 87, 5224 (2000).
W. A. Harrison, Phys. Rev. 123, 85 (1961).
A. I. Khachaturov, Fiz. Nizk. Temp. 31, 109 (2005) [Low Temp. Phys. 31, 85 (2005)].
R. B. Floyd and D. G. Walmsley, J. Phys. C 11, 4601 (1978).
S. S. Liu and G. Y. Guo, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 209, 135 (2000).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
__________
Translated from Pis’ma v Zhurnal Éksperimental’no\(\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\smile}$}}{l}\) i Teoretichesko\(\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\smile}$}}{l}\) Fiziki, Vol. 82, No. 10, 2005, pp. 728–733.
Original Russian Text Copyright © 2005 by Khachaturov.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khachaturov, A.I. Qualitative analysis of spin-dependent tunneling in a ferromagnetic metal-insulator-ferromagnetic metal junction. Jetp Lett. 82, 646–651 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1134/1.2166913
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/1.2166913