Skip to main content
Log in

IR photometry of the symbiotic star BF Cyg: Detection of the red giant’s ellipsoidal brightness variability

  • Published:
Astronomy Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present the results of our IR photometric observations of the classical symbiotic star BF Cyg acquired in 1978–2003. The variability range in the J and K bands was ∼0.2m. A periodic component in the cool star’s brightness variations is clearly visible, its period being half the orbital one and its J amplitude being ∼0.15m. This component is associated with the ellipsoidal shape of the red giant, which model calculations show fills its Roche lobe. This is required in order to reproduce ellipsoidal brightness variability with such a large amplitude: the calculated amplitude for a red giant filling 90% of its Roche lobe is half the observed value. At the same time, it was not possible to confidently chose the optimum component-mass ratio, q = M giant /Mhot, and orbital inclination, i, from possible values in the ranges q = 2–4, i = 70°–90°. Including the contribution from the hot radiation sources (the hot component and ionized envelope), which vary with a period equal to the orbital period, has a considerable influence on the estimated parameters associated with the red giant’s ellipsoidal brightness variations, and this contribution cannot be neglected. The deviations of the observed from the calculated light curve are irregular, with the rms deviation being σ(O-C) ≈ 0.04m.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. A. Boyarchuk and P. E. Gershberg, Eruptive Stars (Nauka, Moscow, 1970), p. 113 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. J. Kenyon, The Symbiotic Stars (Cambridge Univ., Cambridge, 1986), p. 283.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Cassatella, T. Fernandez-Castro, R. Gonzales-Riestra, and J. J. Fuensalida, Astron. Astrophys. 258, 368 (1992).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. A. P. Ipatov and B. F. Yudin, Astron. Astrophys., Suppl. Ser. 65, 51 (1986).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Z. X. Zhu, M. Friedjung, G. Zhao, et al., Astron. Astrophys., Suppl. Ser. 140, 69 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. F. C. Fekel, K. H. Hinkle, R. R. Joyce, et al., Astron. J. 121, 2219 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Skopal, A. Vittone, L. Errico, et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 292, 703 (1997).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. A. A. Tatarnikova, M. Rechkuba, L. M. Buson, et al., Astron. Zh. 77, 220 (2000) [Astron. Rep. 44, 190 (2000)].

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Pucinskas, Bull. Vilnius Astron. Observ. No. 27 (24).

  10. J. Mikolajewska, S. J. Kenyon, and M. Mikolajewski, Astron. J. 98, 1427 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. B. Yudin and U. Munari, Astron. Astrophys. 270, 165 (1993).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. T. Shahbaz, M. Somers, B. Yudin, and T. Naylor, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 288, 1027 (1997).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Mikolajewska, Astron. Soc. Pacif. Conf. Ser. 246, 167 (2001).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. T. A. Lee, Astrophys. J. 162, 217 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. D. M. Terndrup, J. A. Frogel, and A. E. Whitford, Astrophys. J. 357, 453 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. U. S. Kamath and N. M. Ashok, Astron. Astrophys., Suppl. Ser. 135, 199 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. S. J. Tjemkes, J. van Paradijs, and E. J. Zuiderwijk, Astron. Astrophys. 154, 77 (1986).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. W. Schmutz, H. Schild, U. Murset, and H. M. Schmid, Astron. Astrophys. 288, 819 (1994).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Claret, Astron. Astrophys. 363, 1081 (2000).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. S. J. Kenyon and T. Fernandez-Castro, Astron. J. 93, 938 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. J. Mikolajewska, E. A. Kolotilov, S. Yu. Shugarov, and B. F. Yudin, Astron. Astrophys. 392, 197 (2002).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. E. A. Kolotilov, U. Munari, A. A. Popova, et al., Pis’ma Astron. Zh. 24, 39 (1998) [Astron. Lett. 24, 34 (1998)].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. J. Mikolajewska, E. A. Kolotilov, V. I. Shenavrin, and B. F. Yudin, Astron. Soc. Pacif. Conf. Ser. 261, 645 (2002).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

__________

Translated from Astronomicheski\(\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\smile}$}}{l}\) Zhurnal, Vol. 82, No. 3, 2005, pp. 262–272.

Original Russian Text Copyright © 2005 by Yudin, Shenavrin, Kolotilov, Tatarnikova, Tatarnikov.

Deceased.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yudin, B.F., Shenavrin, V.I., Kolotilov, E.A. et al. IR photometry of the symbiotic star BF Cyg: Detection of the red giant’s ellipsoidal brightness variability. Astron. Rep. 49, 232–241 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1882781

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1882781

Keywords

Navigation