Skip to main content
Log in

Twist of magnetic fields in solar active regions

  • Published:
Astronomy Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study the twist properties of photospheric magnetic fields in solar active regions using magnetographic data on 422 active regions obtained at the Huairou Solar Observing Station in 1988–1997. We calculate the mean twist (force-free field αf) of the active regions and compare it with the mean current-helicity density of these same active regions, h c =B ·(∇×B). The latitude and longitude distributions and time dependence of these quantities is analyzed. These parameters represent two different tracers of the α effect in dynamo theory, so we might expect them to possess similar properties. However, apart from differences in their definitions, they also display differences associated with the technique used to recalculate the magnetographic data and with their different physical meanings. The distributions of the mean αf and h c both show hemispherical asymmetry—negative (positive) values in the northern (southern) hemisphere—although this tendency is stronger for h c. One reason for these differences may be the averaging procedure, when twists of opposite sign in regions with weak fields make a small contribution to the mean current-helicity density. Such transequatorial regularity is in agreement with the expectations of dynamo theory. In some active regions, the average αf and h c do not obey this transequatorial rule. As a whole, the mean twist of the magnetic fields αf of active regions does not vary significantly with the solar cycle. Active regions that do not follow the general behavior for αf do not show any appreciable tendency to cluster at certain longitudes, in contrast to results for h c noted in previous studies. We analyze similarities and differences in the distributions of these two quantities. We conclude that using only one of these tracers, such as αf, to search for signatures of the α effect can have disadvantages, which should be taken into account in future studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. Seehafer, Sol. Phys. 125, 219 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. A. A. Pevtsov, R. C. Canfield, and T. R. Metchalf, Astrophys. J. Lett. 440, L109 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. V. I. Abramenko, T. J. Wang, and V. B. Yurchishin, Sol. Phys. 168, 75 (1996).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. S. D. Bao and H. Q. Zhang, Astrophys. J. 496, L43 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. K. M. Kuzanyan, H. Zhang, and S. Bao, Sol. Phys. 191, 231 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. R. C. Canfield and A. A. Pevtsov, in Synoptic Solar Physics, Ed. by K. S. Balasubramaniamn, J. W. Harvey, and D. M. Rabin, ASP Conf. Ser. 140, 131 (1998).

  7. H. Zhang and S. Bao, Astrophys. J. 519, 876 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. G. E. Hale, Nature 119, 708 (1927).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. R. S. Richardson, Astrophys. J. 93, 24 (1941).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. S. F. Martin, R. Bilimoria, and P. W. Tracada, in Solar Surface Magnetism, Eds. C. J. Rutten and C. J. Schrijver (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1994), p. 303.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. M. Rust and A. Kumar, Astrophys. J. Lett. 464, L199 (1996).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. F. Krause and K. H. Rädler, Mean-Field Magnetohydrodynamics and Dynamo Theory (Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  13. F. Krause, Habilitationsschrift (Univ. Jena, 1967); The Turbulent Dynamo, NCAR Technical Note TN/IA-60 (1971).

  14. A. Brandenburg and K. J. Donner, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 288, L29 (1997).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Brandenburg, S. H. Saar, and C. R. Turpin, Astrophys. J. Lett. 498, L51 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. R. K. Keinigs, Phys. Fluids 26, 2558 (1983).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. N. Seehafer, Europhys. Lett. 27, 353 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  18. N. Seehafer, in New Perspectives on Solar Prominences (IAU Coll. 167), Eds. D. Webb, D. Rust, and B. Schmieder, ASP Conf. Ser. 150, 407 (1998).

  19. D. W. Longcope, G. H. Fisher, and A. A. Pevtsov, Astrophys. J. 507, 417 (1998).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. L. Woltjer, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 44, 489 (1958).

    ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. T. J. Wang, A. A. Xu, and H. Q. Zhang, Sol. Phys. 155, 99 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. J. B. Zirker, S. F. Martin, K. Harvey, and V. Gaizauskas, Sol. Phys. 175, 27 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. H. Zhang and S. Bao, Astron. Astrophys. 339, 880 (1998).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. H. Q. Zhang, G. Ai, T. Sakurai, and H. Kurokawa, Sol. Phys. 136, 269 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. H. Q. Zhang, Sol. Phys. 154, 207 (1994).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. S. D. Bao, A. A. Pevtsov, T. J. Wang, and H. Q. Zhang, Sol. Phys. 195, 75 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. E. N. Parker, Astrophys. J. 122, 293 (1955).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. H. Yoshimura, Astrophys. J. 247, 1102 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. N. H. Brummell, N. E. Hurlburt, and J. Toomre, Astrophys. J. 493, 955 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. J. Schou, H. M. Antia, S. Basu, et al., Astrophys. J. 505, 390 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

__________

Translated from Astronomicheski\(\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\smile}$}}{l} \) Zhurnal, Vol. 79, No. 5, 2002, pp. 469–480.

Original Russian Text Copyright © 2002 by Zhang, Bao, Kuzanyan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, H., Bao, S. & Kuzanyan, K.M. Twist of magnetic fields in solar active regions. Astron. Rep. 46, 424–434 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1479429

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1479429

Keywords

Navigation