Abstract
Inclusive K −-meson production in proton-nucleus collisions in the subthreshold-energy regime is analyzed within an appropriate folding model for incoherent primary proton-nucleon and secondary pion-nucleon production processes, which takes properly into account the struck-target-nucleon momentum and removal-energy distribution (nucleon spectral function), novel elementary cross sections for proton-nucleon reaction channels close to threshold, as well as nuclear mean-field potential effects on the one-step and two-step antikaon-creation processes. A detailed comparison of the model calculations of the K − differential cross sections for the reactions p+9Be and p+63Cu at subthreshold energies with the first experimental data obtained at the ITEP proton synchrotron is given. It displays both the relative role of the primary and secondary production channels at incident energies considered and the contributions to K − production that come from the use of the single-particle part and high-momentum-energy part of the nucleon spectral function. It is found that the pion-nucleon production channel does not dominate in the subthreshold “hard” antikaon production in p 9Be and p 63Cu collisions and that the main contributions to the antikaon yields here come from the direct K −-production mechanism. The influence of the nucleon, kaon, and antikaon mean-field potentials on the K − yield is explored. It is shown that the effect of the nucleon mean field is of importance in explaining the considered experimental data on “hard” antikaon production, whereas the K + andK − optical potentials play a minor role. The sensitivity of subthreshold “soft” antikaon production in p 9Be reactions to the nucleon, kaon, and antikaon mean fields is studied. It is demonstrated that, contrary to the case of “hard” antikaon production, the K − potential has a very strong effect on the K − yield, which is comparable with that from the nucleon effective potential.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
W. Cassing and E. L. Bratkovskaya, Phys. Rep. 308, 65 (1999).
D. B. Kaplan and A. E. Nelson, Phys. Lett. B 175, 57 (1986).
G. E. Brown et al., Nucl. Phys. A 567, 937 (1994).
C. H. Lee et al., Nucl. Phys. A 585, 401 (1995).
G. E. Brown and M. Rho, Phys. Rep. 269, 333 (1996); C. H. Lee, Phys. Rep. 275, 255 (1996).
G. Mao et al., nucl-th/9811021.
A. Bhattacharyya et al., Phys. Lett. B 401, 213 (1997).
J. Schaffner-Bielich et al., Nucl. Phys. A 625, 325 (1997).
J. Schaffner and I. N. Mishustin, Phys. Rev. C 53, 1416 (1996).
E. Friedman et al., Phys. Rev. C 60, 024314 (1999).
M. Lutz et al., Nucl. Phys. A 574, 755 (1994).
M. C. Ruivo et al., Nucl. Phys. A 651, 59 (1999).
K. Tsushima et al., Phys. Lett. B 429, 239 (1998).
V. Koch, Phys. Lett. B 337, 7 (1994).
T. Waas et al., Phys. Lett. B 379, 34 (1996); 365, 12 (1996).
G. Q. Li et al., Phys. Lett. B 329, 149 (1994).
E. Friedman et al., Phys. Lett. B 308, 6 (1993); Nucl. Phys. A 579, 518 (1994).
E. Friedman, Nucl. Phys. A 639, 511c (1998).
T. Kishimoto, nucl-th/9910014.
G. Q. Li et al., Nucl. Phys. A 625, 372 (1997).
E. Oset and A. Ramos, Nucl. Phys. A 635, 99 (1998); A. Ramos and E. Oset, nucl-th/9906016.
J. Schaffner-Bielich et al., nucl-th/9907095.
A. Sibirtsev and W. Cassing, Nucl. Phys. A 641, 476 (1998).
A. Sibirtsev and W. Cassing, nucl-th/9909024.
A. Sibirtsev and W. Cassing, nucl-th/9909053.
G. Q. Li et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 235 (1995).
G. Q. Li and C. M. Ko, Nucl. Phys. A 594, 460 (1995).
E. L. Bratkovskaya et al., Nucl. Phys. A 622, 593 (1997).
G. Song et al., Nucl. Phys. A 646, 481 (1999).
Bao-An Li and C. M. Ko, Phys. Rev. C 54, 3283 (1996).
Z. S. Wang et al., Nucl. Phys. A 628, 151 (1998).
Z. S. Wang et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 5, 275 (1999).
P. Crochet, Nucl. Phys. A 654, 765c (1999).
R. Barth et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4007 (1997).
P. Senger (for KaoS Collab.), Acta Phys. Pol. B 27, 2993 (1996).
E. Grosse, Nucl. Phys. A 654, 501c (1999).
F. Laue et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1640 (1999).
A. Schröter et al., Z. Phys. A 350, 101 (1994).
G. Q. Li et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 5214 (1997).
G. E. Brown et al., Nucl. Phys. A 639, 455c (1998).
G. Q. Li et al., Nucl. Phys. A 654, 523c (1999).
W. Cassing et al., Nucl. Phys. A 614, 415 (1997).
V. P. Koptev et al., Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 94 (11), 1 (1988) [Sov. Phys. JETP 67, 2177 (1988)].
A. Shor et al., Nucl. Phys. A 514, 717 (1990).
W. Cassing et al., Phys. Lett. B 238, 25 (1990).
A. Sibirtsev and M. Büscher, Z. Phys. A 347, 191 (1994).
W. Cassing et al., Z. Phys. A 349, 77 (1994).
A. Sibirtsev, Phys. Lett. B 359, 29 (1995).
H. Müller and K. Sistemich, Z. Phys. A 344, 197 (1992).
M. Debowski et al., Z. Phys. A 356, 313 (1996).
A. Sibirtsev et al., Z. Phys. A 358, 357 (1997).
S. V. Efremov and E. Ya. Paryev, Eur. Phys. J. A 1, 99 (1998).
E. Ya. Paryev, Eur. Phys. J. A 5, 307 (1999).
A. V. Akindinov et al., Heavy Ion Phys. 4, 325 (1996).
Yu. T. Kiselev et al., Preprint No. 56-96, ITÉF (Inst. of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow, 1996).
D. Grzonka and K. Kilian, Nucl. Phys. A 639, 569c (1998).
A. Badala et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4863 (1998).
Yu. T. Kiselev (for FHS Collab.), J. Phys. G 25, 381 (1999).
A. V. Akindinov et al., Preprint No. 37-99, ITÉF (Inst. of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow, 1999).
A. V. Akindinov et al., Preprint No. 41-99, ITÉF (Inst. of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow, 1999).
S. V. Efremov and E. Ya. Paryev, Z. Phys. A 348, 217 (1994).
X. S. Fang et al., Phys. Rev. C 49, R608 (1994).
G. Q. Li and C. M. Ko, Phys. Rev. C 54, 1897 (1996).
E. L. Bratkovskaya et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 4, 165 (1999).
F. Balestra (DISTO Collab.), Phys. Lett. B 468, 7 (1999).
S. V. Efremov and E. Ya. Paryev, Yad. Fiz. 57, 563 (1994) [Phys. At. Nucl. 57, 532 (1994)].
W. Oelert, Nucl. Phys. A 639, 13c (1998).
C. Gobbi et al., Phys. Rev. C 50, 1594 (1994).
A. Sibirtsev et al., Z. Phys. A 351, 333 (1995).
E. Ya. Paryev, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Physics with GeV-Particle Beams, Jülich, Germany, 1994, Ed. by H. Machner and K. Sistemich (World Sci., Singapore, 1995), p. 483.
C. Ciofi degli Atti and S. Simula, Phys. Rev. C 53, 1689 (1996).
E. Ya. Paryev, Eur. Phys. J. A 7, 127 (2000).
O. Benhar, S. Fantoni, and G. I. Lykasov, Eur. Phys. J. A 5, 137 (1999).
E. Moeller et al., Phys. Rev. C 28, 1246 (1983).
J. Papp et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 601 (1975); 34, 991 (1975).
Yu. T. Kiselev and V. A. Sheinkman, private communication.
S. V. Efremov and E. Ya. Paryev, Z. Phys. A 351, 447 (1995).
A. Sibirtsev et al., Z. Phys. A 358, 101 (1997).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
From Yadernaya Fizika, Vol. 64, No. 11, 2001, pp. 2016–2032.
Original English Text Copyright © 2001 by Paryev.
This article was submitted by the author in English.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paryev, E.Y. Antikaon production and medium effects in proton-nucleus reactions at subthreshold beam energies. Phys. Atom. Nuclei 64, 1931–1947 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1423743
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1423743