Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of focusing of primary electrons on their reflection from a crystal and on the associated Auger emission

  • Experimental Instruments and Techniques
  • Published:
Technical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The orientational dependence for different groups of secondary electrons — quasi-elastically scattered, inelastically reflected with excitation of a plasmon and with ionization of the core level M 4.5, and the Auger electrons M 4.5 VV — are measured in the primary electron energy range 0.6–1.5 keV. The data are obtained for a Nb (100) single crystal by varying the azimuthal angle of incidence of the primary beam, with complete collection of secondaries. A relationship is established between the processes of focusing and defocusing of the electrons that have penetrated into the crystal in the 〈110〉 and 〈133〉 directions, which differ substantially in the atomic packing density. Specific details of the Auger orientation effect, due to the focusinginduced variation of the flux density of the reflected electrons, are identified and explained. The contributions, both of anisotropy of ionization of the core level and of variation of the backscattering intensity, to the angular dependence of Auger emission and reflection with ionization loss are estimated. The possibilities of using such orientational dependences for an element-sensitive analysis of the local atomic structure of surfaces are assessed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. F. Egelhoff, Jr., Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. 16(3), 213 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. S. Fadley, Synchrotron Radiation Research: Advances in Surface and Interface Science, Vol. 1, Techniques, edited by R. Z. Bachrach (Plenum, New York, 1992), Ch. 9, pp. 421–518.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. A. Chambers, Surf. Sci. Rep. 16(6), 261 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. N. Nakamura, K. Anno, and S. Kono, Surf. Sci. Lett. 262(3), L101 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J.-M. Pan, B. L. Machhoff, U. Diebold et al., Surf. Sci. 291(2), 381 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Erbudak, M. Hochstrasser, T. Schulthess et al., Philos. Mag. Lett. 68(3), 179 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. V. Gomoyunova, I. I. Pronin, N. S. Faradzhev et al., Fiz. Tverd. Tela 36, 2295 (1994) [Phys. Solid State 36, 1250 (1994)].

    Google Scholar 

  8. Y. Gao and J. Cao, Phys. Rev. B 43, 9692 (1991).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Y. N. Idzerda and G. A. Prinz, Phys. Rev. B 43, 11460 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Mroz and M. Nowicki, Surf. Sci. 297(1), 66 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Valeri, A. di Bona, and G. C. Cazzadi, Phys. Rev. B 50, 14617 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. M. V. Gomoyunova and I. I. Pronin, Poverkhnost’, No. 12, 92 (1995).

  13. A. B. Laponsky and N. R. Whetten, Phys. Rev. Lett. 3, 510 (1959).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. R. W. Soshea and A. J. Dekker, Phys. Rev. 121, 1362 (1961).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. A. I. Abroyan and Timov, Fiz. Tverd. Tela 9, 3628 (1967) [Sov. Phys. Solid State 9, 2860 (1967)].

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. M. Stern and H. Taub, Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 1340 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. A. R. Shchul’man, V. V. Korablev, and Yu. A. Morozov, Fiz. Tverd. Tela 10, 1913 (1968) [Sov. Phys. Solid State 10, 1512 (1968)].

    Google Scholar 

  18. H. Taub, R. M. Stern, and V. F. Dvoryankin, Phys. Status Solidi 33(2), 573 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  19. G. Allie, E. Blanc, and D. Dufayard, Surf. Sci. 43(2), 545 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. V. Gomoyunova, S. L. Zaslavskii, and I. I. Pronin, Fiz. Tverd. Tela 20, 3645 (1978) [Sov. Phys. Solid State 20, 2106 (1978)].

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. K. Andersen and A. Howie, Surf. Sci. 50(1), 197 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. M. V. Gomoyunova, O. V. Konstantinov, and I. A. Shmulevich, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR. Ser. Fiz. 46, 2308 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  23. S. A. Chambers, I. M. Vitomirov, and J. H. Weaver, Phys. Rev. B 36, 3007 (1987).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. S. Y. Tong, H. C. Poon, and D. R. Snider, Phys. Rev. B 32, 2096 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. W. F. Engelhoff, Jr., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 559 (1987).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. M. L. Xu, J. J. Barton, and M. A. Van Hove, Phys. Rev. B 39, 8275 (1980).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. A. P. Kaduwela, D. J. Friedman, and C. S. Fadley, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 57(2), 223 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  28. S. Hüfner, J. Osterwalder, T. Greber et al., Phys. Rev. B 42, 7350 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. V. Seelmann-Eggebert, R. Fasel, E. C. Larkins et al., Phys. Rev. B 48, 11838 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. M. Erbudak, T. Schulthess, and E. Wetli, Phys. Rev. B 49, 6316 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. M. P. Seach, Surf. Interface Anal. 2(1), 85 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  32. H. C. Poon and S. Y. Tong, Phys. Rev. B 30, 6211 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. M. V. Gomoyunova, S. L. Dudarev, and I. I. Pronin, Surf. Sci. 235(1), 156 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Zh. Tekh. Fiz. 67, 117–123 (August 1997)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gomoyunova, M.V., Pronin, I.I. Effect of focusing of primary electrons on their reflection from a crystal and on the associated Auger emission. Tech. Phys. 42, 961–966 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1258762

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1258762

Keywords

Navigation