Advertisement

Regional Research of Russia

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 215–224 | Cite as

A New Interdisciplinary Scientific Field: Arctic Regional Science

  • N. Yu. Zamyatina
  • A. N. Pilyasov
Theoretical and Methodological Framework of Social Geography
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

The article establishes the expediency of the formation of Arctic regional science as a new interdisciplinary scientific field. The existing realities of the economic development of Arctic territories cannot always be explained by mainstream economic theories developed for high-density areas of the temperate zone. Rare anomalies that may occur in the temperate zone tend to drive back to the research periphery, whereas such things are commonplace in the Arctic zone, which can no longer be ignored. The key element of the phenomenon of Arctic regional science is that, instead of competitive forces, it deals with an extremely dynamic, ultimately nonstationary, and economically isolated research subject that pulsates with a giant spatiotemporal amplitude, remote from the main developed centers, with dominant monopolies of different types and sizes. The transformation of the initial conceptual blocs of “parental” Arctic regional science is so great and leads far away from the initial theoretical notions, that it is reasonable to talk about the validity of a radical paradigm shift, rather than of a gradual refinement of previous ideas to fit Arctic conditions. In the authors' opinion, this is the primary method to provide the maximum explanatory power to the developed hypotheses and concepts and their successful integration with specific Arctic realities.

Keywords

Arctic regional science economic mainstream market failures remoteness of the Arctic 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Golovnev, A.V., Antropologiya dvizheniya (drevnosti Severnoi Evrazii) (Anthropology of Migration: Ancient Monuments of Northern Eurasia), Yekaterinburg: Volot, 2009.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zamyatina, N.Yu. and Pilyasov, A.N., Concept of proximity: foreign experience and prospects of application in Russia, Reg. Res. Russ., 2017, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kosmachev, K.P., Pionernoe osvoenie taigi: ekonomikogeograficheskie problemy (Pioneering Development of Taiga: Economic and Geographical Problems), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1974.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Noeva, L.I., Development of corporate social responsibility in the northern regions of Russia, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Econ.) Dissertation, Moscow: Russ. Presidential Acad. Natl. Econ. Publ. Admin., 2013.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ostrom, E., Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, London: Academic, 1990.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pilyasov, A.N., Phenomenon of Arctic School of regional studies: Institute of Economical Problems, Kola Scientific Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Sever Rynok: Form. Ekon. Poryadka, 2016, no. 4 (51), pp. 21–32.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pilyasov, A.N. and Zamyatina, N.Yu., Arctic entrepreneurship: conditions and opportunities for development, Arktika: Ekol., Ekon., Energ., 2016, no. 4, pp. 4–15.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Slavin, S.V., Promyshlennoe i transportnoe osvoenie Severa SSSR (Industrial and Transport Development of the North of Soviet Union), Moscow: Ekonomizdat, 1961.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reinert, E., How Rich Countries Got Rich … and Why Poor Countries Stay Poor, London: Constable, 2007.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Humphrey, K., Changing importance of remoteness in modern Russia, Etnogr. Obozr., 2014, no. 3, pp. 8–24.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hickel, W.J., Crisis in the Commons: The Alaska Solution, Oakland: ICS Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Arctic Human Development Report: Regional Processes and Global Linkages, Larsen, J. and Fondahl, G., Eds., Copenhagen: Nord. Counc. Minist., 2014.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ardener, E., “Remote areas”: some theoretical considerations, in The Voice of Prophecy and Other Essays, Ardener, E., Ed., New York: Berghahn Books, 2007, pp. 211–223.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Berman, M., Remoteness and mobility: transportation routes, technologies, and sustainability in Arctic communities, Gumanit. Issled. Vnutr. Azii, 2013, no. 2, pp. 19–31.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hamelin, L.-E., Canadian Nordicity: It’s Your North, Too, Montreal: Harvest House, 1979.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Handbook of Regional Science, Fischer, M. and Nijkamp, P., Eds., Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2014, vols. 1–3.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Herrschell, T., Regionalization and marginalization: bridging old and new divisions in regional governance, in Regional Development in Northern Europe: Peripherality, Marginality and Border Issues, London: Routledge, 2012, chap. 3, pp. 30–48.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Huskey, L. and Morehouse, T.A., Development in remote regions: What do we know? Arctic, 1992, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 128–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Huskey, L., Limits to growth: remote regions, remote institutions, Ann. Reg. Sci., 2006, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 147–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Iammarino, S. and McCann, P., Multinationals and Economic Geography: Location, Technology and Innovation, Cheltenham Glos: Edward Elgar, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Phelps, N.A., Atienza, M., and Arias, M., Encore for the enclave: the changing nature of the industry enclave with illustrations from the mining industry in Chile, Econ. Geogr., 2015, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 119–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Storper, M. and Venables, A.J., Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy, J. Econ. Geogr., 2003, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 351–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Torre, A. and Darly, S., Land use and soils disposal: From competition to territorial governance (examples from land use conflicts in the greater Paris region), Renewable Agric. Food Syst., 2013, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 206–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Institute of Regional ConsultingMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations