Regional Research of Russia

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 47–55 | Cite as

Social trends in Siberian regions

  • Z. I. Kalugina
Population Geography


The paper examines regional disparities in the development level of human potential existing in Russian society. It is concluded that Siberia is not a homogeneous area in terms of human development. In Siberia, there are both territories taking leading positions and demonstrating high qualitative characteristics of the population and economic success, and territories which are performing weakly and are ranked among the weakest regions. In general, over the last 12 years, all Siberian regions were characterized by positive trends, but their growth rates were insufficient for a breakthrough in the social sphere. This has prevented Siberia from breaking out of the rut of a deprived Russian province, which shaped the public opinion and migratory orientation of Siberians. Unjustified social inequalities are predictors of the population’s contraction around the capital metropolis and the western regions of Russia, depopulation of the eastern territories, and threat to the territorial integrity of the country.


Siberia human development indices regional social differences social policy public opinion on Siberia 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Kisel’nikov, A.A., Preliminary results of All-Russian census in Siberian Federal District, Reg.: Ekon. Sotsiol., 2011, no. 4, pp. 260–268.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Siberian Federal District (SFD). Cited December 25, 2012.
  3. 3.
    A Report on Human Development, 2011. Sustainable Development and Equal Opportunities: Better Future for Everyone. Cited February 4, 2013.
  4. 4.
    Andreev, A.L., Innovative way of development of Russia within the context of global educational space, Vestn. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2010, no. 2, pp. 99–106.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Index of Human Development of the Subjects of Russian Federation. Cited February 5, 2013.
  7. 7.
    Independent Institute of Social Policy. Social Atlas of Russian Regions. Cited February 5, 2013.
  8. 8.
    A Report on Human Development in Russian Federation, 2008. Cited February 5, 2013.
  9. 9.
    A Report on Human Development in Russian Regions, 2010. Cited February 5, 2013.
  10. 10.
    A Report on Human Development in Russian Federation, 2011. Cited February 5, 2013.
  11. 11.
    Modernizatsiya i razvitiya chelovecheskogo potentsiala (Modernization and Development of Human Potential), Moscow, 2011.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Molodezh’ v Rossii, 2010: Statisticheskii sbornik (Youth of Russia, 2010: Statistical Handbook), Moscow: Stat. Rossii, 2010.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kalugina, Z.I., Resource deficit of human development as a treat of modernization, Reg.: Ekon. Sotsiol., 2011, no. 1, pp. 50–70.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoe polozhenie Sibirskogo federal’nogo okruga v 2011 godu (Social and Economic Position of Siberian Federal District in 2011), Moscow, 2012.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Kisel’nikov, A.A., Remember the most important, Sovet Direktorov Sibiri, 2012, nos. 8–9 (83–84), pp. 8–9.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bauman, Z., Tekuchaya sovremennost’ (Liquid Modernity), St. Petersburg: Piter, 2008.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Anisimova, A.A. and Echevskaya, O.G., Siberian identity as a factor of sustainable development of Siberia, EKO, 2013, no. 1, pp. 58–76.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussia

Personalised recommendations