Advertisement

Russian Journal of Biological Invasions

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 315–324 | Cite as

On the Issue of Hybridogenic Origin of Bidens × decipiens Warnst.

  • M. A. GalkinaEmail author
  • Yu. K. VinogradovaEmail author
Article
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

The hybrid origin of the Bidens × decipiens species, which was earlier ascribed to the North American alien species B. connata, was confirmed by analyzing the nucleotide sequences of the ITS nuclear site. The name “B. connata” is indicated as invalid for a taxon that does not grow in North America. Earlier, we tested the hypothesis of hybrid origin of B. × decipiens using ISSR analysis and revealed that B. × decipiens can be considered as a complex of hybrids and backcrosses of B. cernua and B. frondosa. Analysis of the Internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and the trnL-trnF intergenic spacer confirmed the hybrid origin of this taxon and made it possible to establish that B. cernua is the maternal species and B. frondosa with a high probability is the paternal species of the taxon.

Keywords:

Bidens invasion hybridization internal transcribed spacer (ITS) trnL-trnF intergenic spacer 

Notes

FUNDING

This study was carried out as part of the state assignment of the Tsitsin Main Botanical Garden, Russian Academy of Sciences (no. 19-119012390082-6), with partial support from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, grant no. 18-04-00411.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The article does not contain any studies involving animals in experiments carried out by any of the authors.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Abbott, R.J., James, J.K., Milne, R.I., et al. Plant introduction, hybridization and gene flow, Philos. Trans. R. Soc., 2003, no. 358, pp. 1123–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andreau, J. and Vilà, M., Risk analysis of potential invasive plants of Spain, J. Nat. Conserv., 2010, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 34–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bleeker, W., Schmitz, U., and Ristow, M., Interspecific hybridization between alien and native plant species in Germany and its consequences for native biodiversity, Biol. Conserv., 2007, vol. 137, no. 2, pp. 248–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Borisova, E.A. and Kurganov, A.A., New and rare species of Ivanovo oblast, Bot. Zh., 2015, vol. 100, no. 5, pp. 504–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crowe, D.R. and Parker, W.H., Hybridization and agamospermy of Bidens in north-western Ontario, Taxon, 1981, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 749–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dawson, W., Fisher, M., and van Kleunen, M., Common and rare plant species respond differently to fertilisation and competition, whether they are alien or native, Ecol. Lett., 2012, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 873–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ellstrand, N.C. and Shierenbeck, K.A., Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2000, vol. 97, no. 13, pp. 7043–7050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elton, C.S., The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants, London: Methuen, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Galkina, M.A. and Ryabchenko, A.S., Species of the genus Bidens on the banks of the Milyatinskoye Reservoir in the Kaluga oblast, Vestn. Tver. Gos. Univ.,Ser. Biol., 2013, vol. 32, no. 31, pp. 75–83.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Galkina, M.A. and Vinogradova, Yu.K., Hybridization of some alien and native taxa of the genus Bidens L. in Eastern Europe, Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Biol., 2017, no. 4, pp. 406–412.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Galkina, M.A., Vinogradova, Yu.K., and Shantser, I.A., Biological and morphological features and microevolution of invasive species of the genus Bidens L., Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Biol., 2015, no. 4, pp. 382–392.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Galkina, M.A., Vinogradova, Yu.K., and Shanzer, I.A., Biomorphological features and microevolution of the invasive species Bidens L. in European Russia, Biol. Bull., 2015, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 315–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Galkina, M.A., Makhinya, L.M., Vinogradova, Yu.K., and Ryabchenko, A.S., Morphological features of Bidens connata Muehl. ex Willd. in different parts of the secondary area (European part of Russia, Ukraine), Introduktsiya Roslin, 2014, no. 2 (62), pp. 43–49.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gasso, N., Basnou, C., and Vilà, M., Predicting plant invaders in the Mediterranean through a weed risk assessment system, Biol. Invasions, 2010, vol. 12, pp. 463–476.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9451-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    GenBank. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore. Accessed March 29, 2019.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Global Plants on JSTOR. https://plants.jstor.org. Accessed March 29, 2019.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jeschke, J. and Heger, T., Invasion Biology: Hypotheses and Evidence, Wallingford: CABI International, 2018.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kubešová, M., Moravcová, L., Suda, J., Jarošík, V., and Pyšek, P., Naturalized plants have smaller genomes than their non-invading relatives: a flow cytometric analysis of the Czech alien flora, Preslia, 2010, vol. 82, pp. 81–96.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mayorov, S.R. and Vinogradova, Yu.K., Formation of secondary distribution range and intraspecific variability of Bidens connata, Proc. 12th Reunion on Ecology and Management of Alien Plant Invasions, September 22–26,2013, Pirenopolis, 2013, p. 119.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mialik, A., Invasive species of the flora of the central part of the Belarusian Polesye, Proc. VIII Int. Sci. Conf. Young Scientists, Graduates, Master and PHD Students “Actual Environmental Problems,” Minsk, November 22–23,2018, Minsk, 2018, pp. 131–132.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nentwig, W., Bacher, S., Kumschick, S., Pyšek P., and Vilà, M., More than “100 worst” alien species in Europe, Biol. Invasions, 2018, vol. 20, pp. 1611–1621.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1651-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rasteniya-agressory. Invazionnye vidy na territorii Belarusi (Plants-Aggressors. Invasive Species in Belarus), Minsk: Beloruss. Entsykl., 2017.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rogers, S.O. and Bendich, A.J., Extraction of DNA from milligram amounts of fresh, herbarium and mummified plant tissues, Plant Mol. Biol., 1985, no. 5, pp. 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Seregin, A.P., The most important new floristic records in the Vladimir oblast, Byull. Mosk. O-va Ispyt. Prir.,Otd. Biol., 2013, vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 65–66.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shaw, J., Lickey, E.B., Schilling, E.E., and Small, R.L., Comparison of whole chloroplast genome sequences to choose noncoding regions for phylogenetic studies in Angiosperms: the tortoise and the hare III, Am. J. Bot., 2007, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 275–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sherff, E.E., The genus Bidens, Publ. Field Mus. Nat. Hist.,Bot. Ser., 1937, vol. 16, pp. 16–74.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sherff, E.E., Further notes on the distribution of Bidens connata vars. pinnata and gracilipes,Rhodora, 1962, vol. 64, no. 757, pp. 23–28.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Skvortsov, V.E. and Grigor’eva, O.V., Bidens connata Muehl. ex Willd. (Asteraceae)—new species in the flora of Russia, Byull. Mosk. O-va Ispyt. Prir.,Otd. Biol., 2005, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 65–67.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Strother, J.L. and Weedon, R.R., Bidens Linnaeus, in Flora of North America, Oxford: Univ. Press, 2006, vol. 21, pp. 205–206.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    The most dangerous invasive species in Russia (TOP-100), Dgebuadze, Yu.Yu., Petrosyan, V.G., and Khlyap, L.A., Eds., Moscow: KMK, 2018. http://www.sevin.ru/Top100Worst/monograph.html. Accessed March 29, 2019.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vinogradova, Yu.K. and Galkina, M.A., On the possibility of hybrid origin of Bidens connata, Mater. XIII Mosk. Sovesh. po filogenii rastenii “50 let bez K.I. Meiera,” Moskva, 2–6 fevralya 2015 goda (Proc. XIII Moscow Phylogeny Meet. “50 Years without K.I. Meier,” Moscow, February 2–6, 2015), Moscow: MAKS Press, 2015, pp. 64–69.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vinogradova, Yu.K. and Galkina, M.A., Hybridization as a factor of invasive activity of alien species of goldenrods (Solidago), Zh. Obsh. Biol., 2019, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vinogradova, Yu.K. and Mayorov, S.R., Lag phase duration as a reflection of plant microevolution in the secondary area, Mater. XIII Mosk. Sovesh. po filogenii rastenii “50 let bez K.I. Meiera,” Moskva, 2–6 fevralya 2015 goda (Proc. XIII Moscow Phylogeny Meet. “50 Years without K.I. Meier,” Moscow, February 2–6, 2015), Moscow: MAKS Press, 2015, pp. 70–74.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vinogradova, Yu.K., Mayorov, S.R., and Khorun, L.V., Chernaya kniga flory Srednei Rossii (Black Book of Flora of Central Russia), Moscow: Geos, 2010.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vinogradova Yu.K., Abramova L.M., Akatova T.V., et al. “The Black Hundred” of invasive plants in Russia, Inf. Bull. Council Bot. Gardens CIS, 2015, vol. 4, no. 27, pp. 85–89.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zalapa, J.E., Brunet, J., and Guries, R.P., Patterns of hybridization and introgression between invasive Ulmus pumila (Uulmaceae) and native U. rubra,Am. J. Bot., 2009, no. 96, pp. 1116–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tsitsin Main Botanical Garden, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations