Russian Journal of Biological Invasions

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 123–133 | Cite as

Invasion of the European Mink in Omsk Oblast

  • B. Yu. KassalEmail author


The invasion of the European mink Mustela lutreola in Omsk oblast continued about 100 years; it was reported for the first time in 1886 and last in 1984. Changes in numbers of the European mink in Omsk oblast were in a direct weak relationship to abiotic factors, such as indicators of solar activity (W, Wolf number) and different moisture conditions within the territory and water level in water bodies. Changes in the area of distribution and population density were in a weak relationship to the timing of spring and fall onsets and the amount of precipitation and snow cover in winter. The average annual harvest amount from professional hunting was rated at ~25% of the individuals living within the territory.


Omsk oblast European mink population abiotic and biotic relations 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Atlas Omskoi oblasti (Atlas of the Omsk Region), Kalinenko, N.A., Ed., Moscow, 1996.Google Scholar
  2. Brandt, I.F., Vertebrate animals of the Northern European Russia, and especially the Northern Urals, in Severnyi Ural i beregovoi khrebet Pai-Khoi (The North Ural Mountains and the Pai-Khoi Coast Range), Gofman, E., Ed., St. Petersburg, 1856, vol. 2, pp. 1–76.Google Scholar
  3. Brückner, E., Klima-Schwankungen seit 1700 nebst Bemerkungen über die Klimaschwankungen der Diluvialzeit, Geogr. Abh., 1890, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 43–58.Google Scholar
  4. Bykov, B.A., Ekologicheskii slovar’ (Ecological Dictionary), Alma-Ata: Nauka, 1988.Google Scholar
  5. Dedyu, I.I., Ekologicheskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar’ (Ecological Encyclopedic Dictionary), Chisinau: Gl. Red. Mold. Sov. Entsikl., 1989.Google Scholar
  6. Dgebuadze, Yu.Yu., Invasions of alien species in Holarctic: some results and perspective of investigations, Russ. J. Biol. Invasions, 2014, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 61–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eliseeva, I.I. and Yuzbashev, M.M., Obshchaya teoriya statistiki (General Theory of Statistics), Eliseeva, I.I., Ed., Moscow: Finansy i Statistika, 2002.Google Scholar
  8. Eversmann, E.A., Estestvennaya istoriya mlekopitayushchikh zhivotnykh Orenburgskogo kraya, ikh obraz zhizni, sposoby lovli i otnoshenie k promyshlennosti (The Natural History of Mammals in the Orenburg Region, Mode of Life, Ways of Catching, and Attitude to Industry), Orenburg, 1850.Google Scholar
  9. Georgi, J.G., Bemerkungen einer Reise im Russischen Reich 1772, 1773 und 1774, St. Petersburg: Kaiserl. Acad. Wissenschaften, 1775, vol. 2.Google Scholar
  10. Geptner, V.G., Naumov, N.P., Yurgenson, P.B., Sludskii, A.A., Chirkova, A.G., and Bannikov, A.G., Mlekopitayushchie Sovetskogo Soyuza, Tom 2: Morskie korovy i khishchnye (Mammals in the Soviet Union, Vol. 2: Sea Cows and Predators), Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola, 1967, part 1.Google Scholar
  11. Gineev, A.M., Introduction, re-introduction and colonization of hunting native animal species, in Resursy zhivoi fauny, Part 2: Pozvonochnye zhivotnye sushi (Living Fauna Resources, Part 2: Vertebrate Animals on the Land), Rostov-on-Don: Rostov. Gos. Univ., 1982, pp. 252–272.Google Scholar
  12. Kassal, B.Yu., Zhivotnye Omskoi oblasti: biologicheskoe mnogoobrazie: Monografiya (Animals of the Omsk Region: Biological Diversity: Monograph), Omsk: Amfora, 2010.Google Scholar
  13. Kassal, B.Yu., Mustela sibirica in the Middle Irtysh Zone, Russ. J. Biol. Invasions, 2013, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 234–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kassal, B.Yu., The nature protection status of mammals of the Omsk region, Omsk. Nauch. Vestn., Ser. Resur. Zemli, Chel., 2014a, no. 1 (128), pp. 155–159.Google Scholar
  15. Kassal, B.Yu., Consequences of the introduction of the Russian red tree squirrrel Sciurus vulgaris exalbidus (Pallas, 1778) to the Omsk oblast, Russ. J. Biol. Invasions, 2014b, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 255–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kassal, B.Yu., Restoration of Middle Irtysh population of wild boar (Sus scrofa), Omsk. Nauch. Vestn., Ser. Resur. Zemli, Chel., 2015, no. 2 (144), pp. 215–224.Google Scholar
  17. Kassal, B.Yu., Restoration of Middle Irtysh population of European beaver, Russ. J. Biol. Invasions, 2016, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kassal, B.Yu., Invasion of the muskrat in the Omsk region, Russ. J. Biol. Invasions, 2017, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 232–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kassal, B.Yu. and Sidorov, G.N., Distribution of the sable (Martes zibellina) and the pine marten (Martes martes) in Omsk oblast and biogeographic effects of their hybridization, Russ. J. Biol. Invasions, 2013, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 105–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Khlyap, L.A., Bobrov, V.V., and Warshavskiy, A.A., Biological invasions on Russian territory: mammals, Russ. J. Biol. Invasions, 2010, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Khlyap, L.A., Warshavskiy, A.A., and Bobrov, V.V., Diversity of alien mammalian species in different regions of Russia, Russ. J. Biol. Invasions, 2011, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 293–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kiseleva, N.V. and Potapkin, A.B., The current distribution of the European mink in the Urals, Mater. VII s”ezda Teriologicheskogo obshchestva (Proc. VII Congr. Theriological Society), Moscow, 2003, p. 160.Google Scholar
  23. Korsh, P.V., Ravdonikas, O.V., Mal’kov, G.B., et al., Carriage and contact with pathogens of viral and bacterial infections among wild animals in the Omsk region, in Voprosy infektsionnoi patologii (Problems of Infectious Pathology), Omsk, 1970, no. 2, pp. 75–78.Google Scholar
  24. Krasnaya kniga Omskoi oblasti (The Red Book of the Omsk Region), Sidorov, G.N. and Plikina, N.V., Eds., Omsk: Omsk. Gos. Pedagog. Univ., 2015.Google Scholar
  25. Kruskal, W.H. and Wallis, W.A., Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 1952, vol. 47, no. 260, pp. 583–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kryuchkov, V.S., Sidorov, G.N., Kuznetsov, E.V., and Dubinina, N.G., Kadastr okhotnich’e-promyslovykh vidov zhivotnykh Omskoi oblasti (Cadastre of Hunting and Commercial Species of Animals in the Omsk Region), Novosibirsk: Zapadno-Sibirskii Fil. All-Russia Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Hunting Farming, 2001.Google Scholar
  27. Lakin, G.F., Biometriya (Biometry), Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola, 1980.Google Scholar
  28. Laptev, I.P., European Mink, in Mlekopitayushchie taezhnoi zony Zapadnoi Sibiri (Mammals in the Western Siberia Taiga Zone), Tomsk: Tomsk. Gos. Univ., 1958, pp. 55–57.Google Scholar
  29. Lode, T., Cormier, J.P., and Le Jacgues, D., Decline in endangered species as an indication anthropic pressures: the case of European mink Mustela lutreola Western population, Environ. Manage., 2001, no. 28, pp. 221–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Middendorf, A.F., Puteshestvie na Sever i Vostok Sibiri: Sever i Vostok Sibiri v estestvenno-istoricheskom otnoshenii, Part 2, Otd. 5: Sibirskaya fauna (Journey to the North and East Siberia: North and East Siberia in the Natural-Historical Terms, Part 2, Ch. 5: Siberian Fauna), St. Petersburg: Imp. Akad. Nauk, 1869.Google Scholar
  31. Moshonkin, N.N., The reproductive cycle of the European mink (Lutreola lutreola L.), Zool. Zh., 1983, vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 1879–1883.Google Scholar
  32. Moshonkin, N.N., The biological foundations for cage breeding of the European mink (Lutreola lutreola L.) as a method of its conservation, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Moscow, 1984.Google Scholar
  33. Novikov, G.A., Khishchnye mlekopitayushchie fauny SSSR (Predatory Mammals of the USSR Fauna), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1956.Google Scholar
  34. Pallas, P.S, Puteshestvie po raznym mestam Rossiiskogo gosudarstva (Journey to Different Provinces of the Russian State), St. Petersburg: Imp. Akad. Nauk, 1786, vol. 2, part 2.Google Scholar
  35. Sabaneev, L.P., Okhotnich’i zveri (Hunting Animals), Moscow: Fizkul’tura i Sport, 1988.Google Scholar
  36. Shreiber, A.F., Snizhenie pushnykh zagotovok v Sibiri, prichiny i mery povysheniya (Reducing of Furs Harvesting in Siberia, the Causes and Measures to Its Enhance), Irkutsk: IRIS, 1916.Google Scholar
  37. Shubin, I.G. and Shubin, N.G., The number of carnivorous animals in the Vasyugan territory, Mater. Vses. soveshch. “Ekologicheskie osnovy okhrany i ratsional’nogo ispol’zovaniya khishchnykh mlekopitayushchikh” (Proc. All-Union Meet. “Ecological Bases of Protection and Rational Use of Predatory Mammals”), Moscow: Nauka, 1979, pp. 252–353.Google Scholar
  38. Shukhov, I.N., Katalog fauny Omskoi oblasti (Srednee Priirtysh’e). Pozvonochnye, Vyp. 2: Mlekopitayushchie (Catalog of Fauna of the Omsk Region: The Middle Irtysh Area, No. 2: Mammals), Palashenkov, A.F., Ed., Omsk: Omsk. Obl. Kraeved. Muz., 1949.Google Scholar
  39. Sidorov, G.N., The European mink in the Omsk region, Mater. VI s”ezda Teriologicheskogo obshchestva (Proc. VI Congr. Theriological Society), Moscow, 1999, p. 230.Google Scholar
  40. Sidorov, G.N., Kassal, B.Yu., and Frolov, K.V., Teriofauna Omskoi oblasti. Khishchnye: Monografiya (Teriofauna of the Omsk Region. Carnivorous Animals: Monograph), Omsk: Omsk. Gos. Pedagog. Univ., 2007.Google Scholar
  41. Sidorov, G.N., Kassal, B.Yu., Frolov, K.V., and Goncharova, O.V., Pushnye zveri Srednego Priirtysh’ya (Teriofauna Omskoi oblasti): Monografiya (Fur-Bearing Animals in the Middle Irtysh Area (Teriofauna of the Omsk Region): Monograph), Omsk: Nauka, 2009.Google Scholar
  42. Skumatov, D.V., European mink in Russia: current status, perspectives for preservation in conditions of continued industrial hunting, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Kirov: All-Russia Nauchno-Issled. Inst. Hunting Farming, 2005.Google Scholar
  43. Slovtsov, I.Ya., Vertebrates of the Tyumen area and their distribution in the Tobolsk province, in Materials k poznaniyu fauny i flory Rossiiskoi imperii (Materials for the Knowledge of the Fauna and Flora of the Russian Empire), Moscow, 1892, no. 1, pp. 187–272.Google Scholar
  44. Stepanov, P.V., Travel notes on the trip in the summer of 1885 in the headwaters of the Tartas and Tara rivers and zoogeographical sketch of the forest-marshy strip lying between the rivers Om’, Tara, and Irtysh, Zap. Zap.-Sib. Otd. Imp. Rus. Geogr. O-va, 1886, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 138.Google Scholar
  45. Sterlyagov, A.V., Features of the environment, conservation and use of American and European mink in the area between the Kama and Vyatka Rivers, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Moscow, 1991.Google Scholar
  46. Teplov, V.P., The quantitative account of otter, sable, marten and small representatives of Mustelidae family, in Metody ucheta chislennosti i geograficheskogo raspredeleniya nazemnykh pozvonochnykh zhivotnykh (Methods for Quantitative Account and Geographical Distribution of Terrestrial Vertebrates), Moscow: Nauka, 1952, pp. 165–172.Google Scholar
  47. Ternovskaya, Yu.G., Preservation of the European mink (Lutreola lutreola), in Nauchnye issledovaniya v zooparkakh (Scientific Research in Zoos), Novosibirsk, 1997, no. 8, pp. 68–70.Google Scholar
  48. Ternovskii, D.V., European mink—endangered species, Mater. nauch. konf. “Vliyanie khozyaistvennoi deyatel’nosti cheloveka na okhotnich’ikh zhivotnykh i sredu ikh obitaniya,” Kirov, 14–16 maya 1980 (Proc. Sci. Conf. “The Influence of Human Economic Activity on Hunting Animals and Their Habitat,” Kirov, May 14–16, 1980), pp. 182–183.Google Scholar
  49. Ternovskii, D.V. and Ternovskaya, Yu.G., Ekologiya kunitseobraznykh (Ecology of Mustelidae), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1994.Google Scholar
  50. The Central Astronomical Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences at Pulkovo. Accessed December 30, 2015.
  51. Tumanov, I.L., Problems of European mink (Mustela lutreola L.): causes of disappearance and protection strategy, Zool. Zh., 1996, vol. 75, no. 9, pp. 1394–1403.Google Scholar
  52. Tumanov, I.L., Redkie khishchnye mlekopitayushchie Rossii (melkie i srednie vidy) (Rare Predatory Mammals of Russia: Small and Medium Species), St. Petersburg: Branko, 2009a.Google Scholar
  53. Tumanov, I.L., Problems of European mink (Mustela lutreola L.): state of resources, causes of disappearance and strategy of protection, Vestn. Okhotoved., 2009b, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 162–166.Google Scholar
  54. Tumanov, I.L. and Zverev, E.L., Modern distribution and quantity of Mustela lutreola (L.) in USSR, Zool. Zh., 1986, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 426–435.Google Scholar
  55. Tupikova, N.V. and Komarova, L.V., Printsipy i metody zoologicheskogo kartografirovaniya (Principles and Methods of Zoological Mapping), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1979.Google Scholar
  56. Vitinskii, Yu.I., Kopetskii, M.V., and Kuklin, G.V., Statistika pyatnoobrazovatel’noi deyatel’nosti Solntsa (Statistics of Solar Spot Generation Activity), Moscow: Nauka, 1986.Google Scholar
  57. Zaikov, G.I., Botanico-geographical zoning, classification and typology of forests with the participation of Siberian spruce in the Omsk Region, in Prirodnoe raionirovanie Omskogo Priirtysh’ya (Natural Zoning of the Omsk Irtysh Territory), Omsk: Omsk. Gos. Pedagog. Inst., 1977, pp. 73–82.Google Scholar
  58. Zudova, G.A., The sexual behavior of European mink, Mater. 2-go Rab. sovesh. po evropeiskoi norke (Mustela lutreola L., 1761), Nelidovo, 5–9 sentyabrya 2001, Tezisy dokladov (The 2nd Workshop on European mink (Mustela lutreola L., 1761), Nelidovo, September 5–9, 2001, Abstracts of Papers), Nelidovo, 2002, pp. 25–26.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dostoevsky State UniversityOmskRussia

Personalised recommendations