Gyroscopy and Navigation

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 19–25 | Cite as

Analysis of filtering and smoothing techniques as applied to aerogravimetry

  • O. A. Stepanov
  • D. A. Koshaev


The problem of gravity anomaly estimation aboard an aircraft solved by using the data from a gravimeter and the differential satellite navigation system is formulated in the framework of the optimal filtering and smoothing theory. Relying upon this statement both the problem of the potential accuracy analysis and problem of designing efficient filtering and smoothing algorithms are solved. In particular, the efficiency of filtering and smoothing in estimating gravity anomalies using various satellite measurements is investigated. A unified algorithm for solving the filtering and smoothing problems is suggested. An example illustrating the results obtained is considered.


Gravity Anomaly Reverse Time Satellite Measurement Steady State Mode Unify Algorithm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Meditch, J.S., Stochastic Optimal Linear Estimation and Control, New York, Mc. Graw Hill, 1969.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stepanov, O.A., Blazhnov, B.A., and Koshaev, D.A., The Efficiency of Using Velocity and Coordinate Satellite Measurements in Determining Gravity aboard an Aircraft (Proc. of 9th St. Petersburg International Conference on Integrated Navigation Systems, May), Russia, 2002.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stepanov, O.A., Investigation of Optimal Filtering and Smoothing Algorithms for One Class of Applied Problems (Proceedings of 7th European Control Conference ECC’01. 1–4 September, 2003) Cambridge, UK, 2003.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stepanov, O.A., Relations of Algorithms of Optimal Stationary Filtering and Smoothing, Giroskopiya i navigatsiya, 2004, no. 1, pp. 16–26.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stepanov, O.A., An Efficient Unified Algorithm for Filtering and Smoothing Problems (Proceedings IFAC Workshop on Adaptation and Learning in Control and Signal Processing, 2004).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blazhnov, B.A., Nesenjuk, L.P., Peshekhonov, V.G., Sokolov, A.V., Elinson, L.S., and Zhelesnyak L.K. An Integrated Mobile Gravimetric System. Development and test results (Proceedings of the 9th Saint-Petersburg International Conference on Integrated Navigation Systems).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jordan, S.K., Self-consistent Statistical Models for Gravity Anomaly and Undulation of the Geoid., J. Geophys. Res., 1972, vol. 77, no. 20, pp. 3660–3670.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harry, L. Van Trees. Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory, New York-London-Sydney; Partl. MIT. John Wiley. Inc., 1968.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chelpanov, I.B., Nesenyuk, L.P., and Braginskii, M.V., Calculation of characteristics of navigation aids, Leningrad, Sudostroenie, 1978, in Russian.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dmitriev, S.P., Kolevatov, A.P., Nesenyuk, L.P., and Stepanov, O.A.., Gravimetric Data Processing in Marine Navigation (Proceedings of International Symposium Terrestrial Gravimetry: Static and Mobile Measurements.), Saint Petersburg, 2007.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kulakova, V.I., Nebylov, A.V., and Stepanov, O.A.., Comparison of Robust Algorithms for Airborne Gravimetry (Proceedings of the 5th IFAC Symposium on Robust Control Design.) Toulouse, 2006.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. A. Stepanov
    • 1
  • D. A. Koshaev
    • 1
  1. 1.Concern GSRI ElektropriborJSCSt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations