Advertisement

Catalysis in Industry

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 243–250 | Cite as

Behavior of a Two-Phase Gas–Liquid Flow at the Inlet into a Catalytic Reactor

  • O. P. KlenovEmail author
  • A. S. NoskovEmail author
ENGINEERING PROBLEMS. OPERATION AND PRODUCTION
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

The behavior of a two-phase flow inside the inlet pipeline of a catalytic reactor is investigated. In addition to the classical approach using familiar flow diagrams, means of computational fluid dynamics are used for three-dimensional modeling of the spatial distribution of phases in the pipeline during operation. Results show a nonuniform distribution of the liquid phase over the over the pipeline outlet cross section surface, plus a mass flow of the liquid phase that is not stable over time. The maximum peak flow rates exceed the average values by ~300%. Compared to data from flow diagrams, CFD modeling shows that a change in the gas flow in the investigated range does not alter the nature of a two-phase flow, but an increase in the gas flow reduces the irregularity of the distribution of the liquid phase over the pipeline outlet cross section. Data on the behavior of a flow are needed to design catalytic reactor structures that ensure the uniform distribution of a two-phase flow to the catalyst bed for, e.g., hydrotreating reactors in the oil refining industry.

Keywords:

two-phase gas-liquid flow hydrotreating processes two-phase flow pattern maps computational fluid dynamics (CFD) spatial flow distribution 

Notes

FUNDING

This work was performed as a part of the state task for the Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, project no. АААА-А17-117041710077-4.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Wallis, G.B., One-Dimensional Two-Phase Flow, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1969.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chisholm, D., Two-Phase Flows in Pipelines and Heat Exchangers, London: George Godwin, 1983.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baker, O., Oil Gas J., 1954, vol. 53, no. 12, pp. 185–195.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mandhane, J.M., Gregory, G.A., and Aziz, K., Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 1974, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 537–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Golan, L.P. and Stenning, A.H., Proc.—Inst. Mech. Eng., 1969, vol. 184, no. 3, pp. 110–116.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee, A.-H., Sun, J.-H., and Jepson, W.P., Abstract of Papers, Proc. 3rd Int. Offshore Polar Eng. Conf., Singapore, 1993, vol. 2, p 159.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Whalley, P.B., Boiling, Condensation, and Gas-Liquid Flow, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Taitel, Y. and Dukler, A.E., AIChE J., 1976, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oshinowo, T. and Charles, M.E., Can. J. Chem. Eng., 1974, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pinto del Corral, N., Analysis of Two-Phase Flow Pattern Maps. http://www.energetickeforum.cz/ext/2pf/ maps/Documents/Analysis_of_maps.pdf. Cited October 15, 2018.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vargaftik, N.B., Spravochnik po teplofizicheskim svoistvam gazov i zhidkostei (Handbook on the Thermophysical Properties of Gases and Liquids), Moscow: Nauka, 1972.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    ANSYS Official Website, ANSYS FLUENT User’s Guide. https://www.pdfdrive.com/ansys-fluent-users-guide-e6036262.html. Cited July 7, 2019.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussia

Personalised recommendations