Contemporary Problems of Ecology

, Volume 11, Issue 6, pp 682–686 | Cite as

Effects of Climate Change on Paralaudakia lehmanni (Nicolsky, 1896) (Reptilia: Agamidae) in Central Asia

  • Nasser SancholiEmail author


Climate change and global warming are the main challenges regarding to the conservation biologists on the world. Reptiles are ectothermic animal and then highly dependent on the habitat temperature and precipitation. To protect reptiles, it is necessary to predict the impact of climate change effect on the species distribution and manage its conservation program. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of climate change on the distribution pattern of Paralaudakia lehmanni in Central Asia. According to the results, the current distribution is predicted from North Afghanistan, Tajikistan, and Kyrgyzstan and the precipitation of coldest quarter (BIO19) was the most contributed bioclimate variable. Future predictions show a similar pattern with the current period and, based on the niche overlap test, the overlap of these patterns was more than 0.85 and indicated no differences between them. Distribution can be affected by the highland distribution of P. lehmanni. Because this species has such an elevated range, precipitation of coldest quarter is not predicted to change much in future and therefore suitable habitats will remain similar to current period. Finally, although there is no predicted impact of climate change on the species distribution pattern in future, the conservation of P. lehmanni is important because of other threats such as human disturbance and predation.


Central Asia Turkestan rock lizard climate change global warming Tajikistan Afghanistan 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anan’eva, N.B. and Golynskii, E.A., Analysis of distribution of the Turkistan rock agama, Paralaudakia lehmanni (Nikolsky, 1896): Using of MAXENT modeling, Tr. Zool. Inst., Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2013, vol. 317, no. 4, pp. 426–437.Google Scholar
  2. Araujo, M.B., Thuiller, W., and Pearson, R.G., Climate warming and the decline of amphibians and reptiles in Europe, J. Biogeogr., 2006, vol. 33, pp. 1712–1728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blair, M.E., Sterling, E.J., Dusch, M., Raxworthy, C.J., and Pearson, R.G., Ecological divergence and speciation between lemur (Eulemur) sister species in Madagascar, J. Evol. Biol., 2013, vol. 26, pp. 1790–1801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Colwell, R.K., Brehm, G., Cardelus, C.L., Gilman, A.C., and Longino, J.T., Global warming, elevational range shifts, and lowland biotic attrition in the wet tropics, Science, 2008, vol. 322, pp. 258–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Duffy, J.E., Why biodiversity is important to the functioning of real-world ecosystems, Front. Ecol. Environ., 2009, vol. 7, pp. 437–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hijmans, R.J. and Graham, C.H., The ability of climate envelope models to predict the effect of climate change on species distributions, Global Change Biol., 2006, vol. 12, pp. 2272–2281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hijmans, R.J., Cameron, S.E., Parra, J.L., Jones, P.G., and Jarvis, A., Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas, Int. J. Climatol., 2005, vol. 25, pp. 1965–1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hirzel, A.H., Le Lay, G., Helfer, V., Randin, C., and Guisan, A., Evaluating the ability of habitat suitability models to predict species presences, Ecol. Model., 2006, vol. 199, pp. 142–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Malcolm, J.R., Liu, C., Neilson, R.P., Hansen, L., and Hannah, L.E.E., Global warming and extinctions of endemic species from biodiversity hotspots, Conserv. Biol., 2006, vol. 20, pp. 538–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Manel, S., Williams, H.C., and Ormerod, S.J., Evaluating presence–absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence, J. Appl. Ecol., 2001, vol. 38, pp. 291–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pearson, R.G. and Dawson, T.P., Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 2003, vol. 12, pp. 361–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Phillips, S.J., Anderson, R.P., and Schapire, R.E., Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions, Ecol. Model., 2006, vol. 190, pp. 231–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Solomon, S., Plattner, G.K., Knutti, R., and Friedlingstein, P., Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 2009, vol. 106, pp. 1704–1709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Warren, D.L., Glor, R.E., and Turelli, M., ENMTools: a toolbox for comparative studies of environmental niche models, Ecography, 2010, vol. 33, pp. 607–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wisz, M.S., Pottier, J., Kissling, W.D., Pellissier, L., Lenoir, J., Damgaard, C.F., and Heikkinen, R.K., The role of biotic interactions in shaping distributions and realized assemblages of species: implications for species distribution modeling, Biol. Rev. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 2013, vol. 88, pp. 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biology, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of ZabolZabolIran

Personalised recommendations