Skip to main content
Log in

Efficient Branching Programs for Quantum Hash Functions Generated by Small-Biased Sets

  • Published:
Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the paper we consider quantum (δ, ϵ)-hash functions in so called phase form (phase quantum (δ, ϵ)-hash function). It is known that ϵ-biased sets generate phase quantum (δ, ϵ)- hash function. We show that the construction is invertible, that is, phase quantum (δ, ϵ)-hash function defines ϵ-biased sets. Next, we present an efficient (in the sense of time and qubits needed) Branching program construction for phase quantum (δ, ϵ)-hash function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F. Ablayev and A. Vasiliev, “Cryptographic quantum hashing,” Laser Phys. Lett. 11, 025202 (2014).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. A. S. Holevo, “Some estimates of the information transmitted by quantum communication channel,” Probl. Pered. Inform. 9 (3), 3–11 (1973).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. R. Amiri and E. Andersson, “Unconditionally secure quantum signatures,” Entropy 17, 5635–5659 (2015).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Naor and M. Naor, “Small-bias probability spaces: efficient constructions and applications,” in Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC’90, 1990, pp. 213–223.

  5. F. Ablayev and A. Vasiliev, “Computing Boolean functions via quantum hashing,” Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 8808, 149–160 (2014).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Nayak, “Optimal lower bounds for quantum automata and random access codes,” in Proceedings of the 40th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 1999, pp. 369–376.

  7. F. Ablayev and M. Ablayev, “Quantum hashing via ϵ-universal hashing constructions and Freivaldśfingerprinting schemas,” Lect. NotesComput. Sci. 8614, 42–52 (2014).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. H. Buhrman, R. Cleve, J. Watrous, and R. de Wolf, “Quantum fingerprinting,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 167902 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D. Gottesman and I. Chuang, “Quantum digital signatures,” arXiv:quant-ph/0105032 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Vasiliev, “Quantum hashing for finite abelian groups,” Lobachevskii J.Math. 37, 751–754 (2016).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Ben-Aroya and A. Ta-Shma, “Constructing small-bias sets from algebraic-geometric codes,” Theory Comput. 9, 253–272 (2013).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. F. Ablayev.

Additional information

Submitted by A. M. Elizarov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ablayev, M.F. Efficient Branching Programs for Quantum Hash Functions Generated by Small-Biased Sets. Lobachevskii J Math 39, 961–966 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S199508021807003X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S199508021807003X

Keywords and phrases

Navigation