Cell and Tissue Biology

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 65–79 | Cite as

Variability of microsatellites BM224 and Bcal7 in populations of green toads (Bufo viridis complex) differing by nuclear DNA content and ploidy

  • S. N. Litvinchuk
  • Yu. M. Rozanov
  • N. M. Usmanova
  • L. Ya. Borkin
  • L. F. Mazanaeva
  • V. I. Kazakov
Article
  • 46 Downloads

Abstract

The variability of microsatellites BM224 and Bcal7 was studied for the first time in three species of the diploid-polyploid complex of Bufo viridis (B. viridis, B. oblongus, and B. pewzowi). The locus Bcal7 was established to be monomorphic in all samples studied. In microsatellite BM224, three allele variants were found. Among tetraploid toads, the western Asiatic species B. oblongus was characterized by one allele only, the eastern B. pewzowi, by the two other alleles. A similar distribution was also revealed in triploid individuals on the borders of range between tetraploid and diploid species. Among the diploid species B. viridis samples, all three allele variants of microsatellite BM224 were observed. Their distribution in the area proved to be geographically determined. In diploid toads, a similarity was revealed between the distribution of microsatellite BM224 alleles and variability of the nuclear DNA content.

Key words

microsatellites genome size nuclear DNA content polyploidy Bufo viridis Bufo oblongus Bufo pewzowi 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Borkin, L.Ya., Litvinchuk, S.N., Rozanov, Yu.M., and Skorinov, D.V., On Cryptic Species (by Example of Amphibians), Zool. Zh., 2004, vol. 83, no. 8, pp. 936–960 [full English version in Entomol. Rev., 2005, vol. 84, Suppl. 1, pp. 575–598].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Borkin, L.Ya., Rozanov, Yu.M., Terbish, Kh., and Tsaune, I.A., Distribution, Karyology, Taxonomic Position, and Variability in Tetraploid Toads of the Bufo viridis Group in Mongolia, Gerpetologicheskie issledovaniya v Mongolskoi Narodnoi Respublike (Herpetological Studies in the Mongolian People Republic), Vorobieva, E.I., Ed., Moscow, 1986a, pp. 120–143.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Borkin, L.Ya., and Sokolova T.M.. Electrophoretic Comparison of Diploid and Teraploid Toads of the Bufo viridis Group (Preliminary Data), Voprosy gerpetologii. Materialy 8oi Gerpetoplogicheskoi Konferentsii SSSR (Problems of Herpetology. Materials of the 8th USSR Herpetological Conference), Shzherbak, N.N., Ed., Kiev, 1989, pp. 36–38.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Borkin L.Ya., Terbish Kh., and Tsaune, I.A. Tetraploid and Diploid Toads from the Bufo viridis Group in Mongolia, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1986b, vol. 287, No. 3, pp. 760–764 [translated in USA in Doklady Biological Sciences, Proc. Acad. Sci. USSR, 1986, vol. 287, no. 1–6, pp. 243–246].Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kryukov, V.I., Rzhepakovskii, V.T., and Astapov, V.P., Karyotypic Characteristics of Seven Toad Samples from Tajikistan, Dokl. Akad. Nauk Tajik. SSR, 1985, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 593–595.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kudryavtsev, B.N., Ni, V.V., Borkin, L.Ya., and Solov’eva, L.V., RNA and Protein Amount in Cells of Diploid and Tetraploid Toads of Bufo viridis Group, Tsitologiya, 1988, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 1324–1331.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Litvinchuk, S.N., Kazakov, V.I., and Anatskii, S.Yu., Animal Museum Collections in Molecular Genetic Studies, Usp. Sovrem. Biol., 2002, vol. 122, no. 5, pp. 444–448.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Litvinchuk, S.N., Rozanov, Yu.M., Borkin, L.Ya., et al., Genome Size and Problems of Systematics of Tailed Amphibians (by the Example of Salamandridae and Hynobiidae), Voprosy gerpetologii. Materialy 1-oi konferentsii gerpetologicheskogo obshchestva im. A.M. Nikolskogo (Problems of Herpetology. Materials of the 1st Conference of A.M. Nikol’skii Herpetological Society), Pushchino-Moscow, 2001, pp. 168–170.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mazik E.Yu., Kadyrova, B.K., and Toktosunov, A.T., Karyotype Patterns in the Green Toad Bufo viridis in Kirghizia, Zool. Zh., 1976, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 1740–1742.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mezhzherin, S.V. and Pisanets, E.M., Genetic Structure and Origin of Asiatic Polyploid Toads Bufo danatensis Pisanets, 1978, Dopov. Akad. Nauk Ukrain. SSR, Ser. B, Geol. Khim. Biol., 1990, vol. 8, pp. 68–71.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mezhzherin, S.V. and Pisanets, E.M., Genetic Divergence of Green Toads of the Bufo viridis Complex of the USSR Fauna, Dokl. AN SSSR, 1991, vol. 317, no. 1, pp. 222–226.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mezhzherin, S.V. and Pisanets, E.M., Genetic Structure and Origin of the Tetraploid Toad Bufo danatensis Pisanetz, 1978 (Amphibia, Bufonidae) from Central Asia: Biochemical Polymorphisms and Comparison of Heterozygosity Levels in Diploid and Tetraploid Species, Genetika, 1995a, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 43–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mezhzherin, S.V. and Pisanets, E.M., Genetic Structure and Origin of the Tetraploid Toad Bufo danatensis Pisanetz, 1978 (Amphibia, Bufonidae) from Central Asia. Differentiation of Forms and Genetic Interconnections of Diploid and Tetraploid Species. Genetika, 1995b, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 342–352.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Orlova, V.F. and Uteshev, V.K., A Tetraploid Toad of the Bufo viridis Group from Dzhungarian Gobi, Gerpetologicheskie Issledovaniya v Mongolskoi Narodnoi Respublike (Herpetological Studies in the Mongolian People Republic), Vorobieva, E.I., Ed., Moscow: Nauka, 1986, pp. 151–157.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pisanets, E.M., On a New Polyploid Species of Toads Bufo danatensis Pisanetz sbp from Turkmenia. Dokl. AN UkrSSR, Ser. B, Geol., Geogr., Khim. Biol., 1978a, vol. 3, pp. 277–282.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pisanets, E.M., New Data on Karyology of the Bufo viridis—Complex (Amphibia: Bufonidae) and the Problem of Origin of Asiatic Tetraploid Toads, Gerpetol. Issled., 1991, vol. 1, pp. 41–50.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pisanets, E.M. and Mezhzherin, S.V., Studies on Hybridization and External Morphology of Asiatic Toads (Amphibia: Bufonidae), with Description of New Species Bufo shaartusiensis sp. nov., Dopov. Nation. Akad. Nauk Ukr., 1996, vol. 6, pp. 147–151.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pisanets, E.M. and Shcherbak, N.N., Systematics of Green Toads (Amphibia, Anura) of the USSR Fauna, Vestn. Zool., 1979, vol. 4, pp. 11–16.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rozanov, Yu.M. and Vinogradov, A.E., Precisional DNA Cytometry: Study of Individual Variability in Animal Genome Size, Tsitologiya, 1998, vol. 40, no. 8/9, pp. 792–799.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Khalturin, M.D., Litvinchuk, S.N., Borkin, L.Ya., et al., Genetic Variability in Two Cryptic Forms of the Common Spadefoot Toad Pelobates fuscus (Pelobatidae, Anura, Amphibia) Differing by Genome Size, Tsitologiya, 2003, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 308–323.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Alves, J.M., Coelho, M.M., and Callares-Pereira, M.J., Evolution in Action through Hybridization in an Iberian Freshwater Fish: a Genetic Review, Genetica, 2001, vol. 111, pp. 375–385.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Arens, P., Van’t Westende, W., Bugter, R., Smulders, M.J.M., and Vosman, B., Microsatellite Markers from the European Tree Frog Hyla arborea, Molec. Ecol., 2000, vol. 9, pp. 1944–1946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bachmann, K., Konrad, A., Oeldorf, E., and Hemmer, H., Genome Size in the Green Toads (Bufo viridis) Group, Experientia, 1978, vol. 34, pp. 331–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Balletto, E., Borkin, L., Castellano, S., et al., Sistematica e Filogenesi nel Complesso di Bufo viridis Laurenti, 1768, Riv. Idrobiol., 1999, vol. 38, pp. 199–220.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bennett, M.D., and Smith, J.B., Nuclear DNA Amounts in Angiosperms, Philosoph. Transact. Royal Soc., London, Biol. Sci., 1976, vol. 274, pp. 227–274.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Berlin, S., Merilä, J., and Ellegren, H., Isolation and Characterization of Polymorphic Microsatellite Loci in the Common Frog, Rana temporaria, Mol. Ecol., 2000, vol. 9, pp. 1938–1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Borkin, L.Ya., Distribution of Amphibians in North Africa, Europe, Western Asia, and the Former Soviet Union, Patterns of Distribution of Amphibians: a Global Perspective, Baltimore and London: The John Hopkins University Press, 1999, pp. 329–420.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Borkin, L.Ya., Caune, I.A., Pisanetz, E.M., and Rozanov, Y.M., Karyotype and Genome Size in the Bufo viridis Group. Studies in Herpetology. 6th Ord. Gen. Meet. Soc. Eur. Herp., Prague, 1986, pp. 137–142.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Borkin, L.Ya., Eremchenko, V.K., Helfenberger, N., et al., On the Distribution of Diploid, Triploid, and Tetraploid Green Toads (Bufo viridis Complex) in Southeastern Kazakhstan, Russ. J. Herpet., 2001a, vol. 8, pp. 45–53.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Borkin, L.Ya., Korshunov, A.V., Lada, G.A., et al., Mass Occurrence of Polyploidy Green Frogs (Rana esculenta Complex) in Eastern Ukraine, Russ. J. Herpet., 2004, vol. 11, pp. 194–213.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Borkin, L.Ya., Litvinchuk, S.N., Rozanov, Yu.M., and Milto, K.D., Cryptic Speciation in Pelobates fuscus (Anura, Pelobatidae): Evidence from DNA Flow Cytometry, Amphibia-Reptilia, 2001b, vol. 22, pp. 387–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Borkin, L.Ya., Litvinchuk, S.N., Rozanov, Yu.M., et al., New Data on the Distribution of Two Cryptic Species of the Common Spadefoot Toad (Pelobates fuscus) in Eastern Europe, Russ. J. Herpet., 2003, vol. 10, pp. 115–122.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Borkin, L.Ya., Litvinchuk, S.N., Rozanov, Yu.M., et al., Genome Size Variation in the Balkan Anurans, Herpetologia Petropolitana. Proceedings of the 12th Ordinary General Meeting of the Societas Europaea Herpetologica, St. Petersburg, 2005, pp. 16–19.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Borkin, L.Ya., Rozanov, Yu.M., and Litvinchuk, S.N., Nuclear DNA Content in Some Green Toads (Bufo viridis Complex) of Turkey and Iran, Russ. J. Herpet., 2000, vol. 7, pp. 171–180.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Borkin, L.Ya., Vinogradov, A.E., Brushko, Z.K., and Kuzmin, S.L., New Records of Tetraploid Toads (Bufo viridis group) from Alma-Ata and Taldy-Kurgan Region, Kazakhstan, Russ. J. Herpet., 1995, vol. 2, pp. 174–175.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Burton, D.W., Bicham, J.W., and Genoways, H.H., Flow-cytometric Analyses of Nuclear DNA Content in Four Families of Neotropical Bats, Evolution, 1989, vol. 43, pp. 756–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Castellano, S., Giacoma, C., Dujsebayeva, T., et al., Diploid and Tetraploid Green Toads (Bufo viridis Complex): Analysis of Morphometrical Differences among Females, Atti del I Congresso Nazionale della Societas Herpetologica Italica. Torino: Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali, 2000, pp. 385–390.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Castellano, S., Giacoma, C., and Ryan, M.J., Call Degradation in Diploid and Tetraploid Green Toads, Biol. J. Linnean Soc., 2003, vol. 78, pp. 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Castellano, S., Tontini, L., Giacoma, C., Lattes, A., and Balletto, E., The Evolution of Release and Advertisement Calls in Green Toads (Bufo viridis Complex), Biol. J. Linnean Soc., 1998, vol. 77, pp. 379–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Delpero, M., Cervella, P., Borkin, L.Ya., et al., Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) Analysis of Asiatic Population of the Bufo viridis Complex, Atti del I Congresso Nazionale della Societas Herpetologica Italica. Torino: Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali, 2000, pp. 299–304.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Dujsebayeva, T., Castellano, S., Giacoma, C., et al., On the Dis tribution of Diploid and Tetraploid Green Toads of the Bufo viridis Complex (Anura, Bufonidae) in Southern Kazakhstan, Asiat. Herpet. Res., 1997, vol. 7, pp. 27–31.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Dujsebayeva, T., Castellano, S., Magni, P., and Odierna, G., New Data on Distribution of Amphibians and Reptilies in the Aral Sea Basin and Surrounding Areas of Kazakhstan. Part I. The Green Toads of Bufo viridis Complex (Amphibia: Anura), Selevinia, 2004, pp. 60–65.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Evans, B.J., Kelley, D.B., Tinsley, R.C., et al., A Mitochondrial DNA Phylogeny of African Clawed Frogs: Phylogeography and Implications for Polyploidy Evolution, Mol. Phylog. Evol., 2004, vol. 33, pp. 197–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Garner, T.W.J., Gautschi, B., Rothlisberger, S., and Reyer H.-U., A set of CA Repeat Microsatellite Markers Derived from the Pool Frog, Rana lessonae, Mol. Ecol., 2000, vol. 9, pp. 2173–2175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Jehle, R., and Arntzen, J.W., Review: Microsatellite Markers in Amphibian Conservation Genetics, Herpet. J., 2002, vol. 12, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Johnson, O.W., Utter, P.M., and Rabinovitch, P.S., Interspecies Differences in Salmonid Cellular DNA Identified by Flow Cytometry, Copeia, 1987, pp. 1001–1009.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Krupa, A.P., Jehle, R., Dawson, D.A., et al., Microsatellite Loci in the Crested Newt (Triturus cristatus) and Their Utility in Other New Taxa, Conserv. Genet., 2002, vol. 3, pp. 87–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Licht, L.E., and Lowcock, L.A., Genome Size and Metabolic Rate in Salamanders, Compar. Biochem. Physiol., 1991, vol. 100B, pp. 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Litvinchuk, S.N., Borkin, L.Ya., Džukić, G., et al., Taxonomic Status of Triturus karelinii on the Balkans, with Some Comments about Other Crested Newt Taxa, Russ. J. Herpet., 1999, vol. 6, pp. 153–163.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Litvinchuk, S.N., Borkin, L.Ya., and Rozanov, Yu.M., Intra-and Interspecies Genome Size Variation in Hynobiid Salamanders of Russia and Kazakhstan: Determination by Flow Cytometry, Asiat. Herpet. Res., 2004, vol. 10, pp. 282–294.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Litvinchuk, S.N., Borkin, L.Ya., Rozanov, Yu.M., et al., Geographic Differentiation in Newts (Triturus) of Eastern Europe: Genome Size, Allozymes, and Morphology. Herpetologia Petropolitana. Proceedings of the 12th Ordinary General Meeting of the Societas Europaea Herpetologica, St. Petersburg, 2005a, pp. 51–54.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Litvinchuk, S.N., Rozanov, Yu.M., and Borkin, L.Ya., Natural Autotriploidy in the Danube Newt, Triturus dobrogicus (Salamandridae), Russ. J. Herpet., 2001, vol. 8, pp. 74–76.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Litvinchuk, S.N., Zuiderwijk, A., Borkin, L.Ya., and Rozanov, Yu.M., Taxonomic Status of Triturus vittatus (Amphibia: Salamandridae) in Western Turkey: Trunk Vertebrae Count, Genome Size and Allozyme Data, Amphibia-Reptilia, 2005b, vol. 26, pp. 305–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Lizana, M., Marquez, R., Martin-Sanchez, R., et al., Determination of Cellular DNA Content of Iberian Salamanders by Flow Cytometry, Amphibia-Reptilia, 2000, vol. 21, pp. 411–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Lockwood, S.F., and Derr, J.N., Intra-and Interspecific Genome Size Variation in the Salmonidae, Cytogen. Cell Gen., 1992, vol. 59, pp. 303–306.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Lockwood, S.F., Holland, B.S., Bickham, J.W., et al., Intraspecific Genome Size Variation in a Turtle (Trachemys scripta) Exhibiting Temperature-dependent Sex Determination, Can. J. Zool., 1991a, vol. 69, pp. 2306–2310.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Lockwood, S.F., Seavey, B.T., Dillinger, R.E., Jr., and Bickham, J.W., Variation in DNA Content Among Age Classes of Broad Whitefish (Coregonus nasus) from the Sagavanirktok River Delta, Can. J. Zool., 1991b, vol. 69, pp. 1335–1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    MacCulloch, R.D., Upton, D.E., Murphy, R.W., Trends in Nuclear DNA Content among Amphibians and Reptiles, Comp. Biochem. Physiol., 1996, vol. 113B, pp. 601–605.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Mazin, A.L. and Borkin, L.Ya., Nuclear DNA Content in Green Frogs of the Genus Rana, Mitteil. Zool. Museum in Berlin, 1979, vol. 55, pp. 217–224.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Murphy, R.W., Lowcock, L.A., Smith, C., et al., Flow Cytometry in Biodiversity Surveys: Methods, Utility, and Constraints, Amphibia-Reptilia, 1997, vol. 18, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Neff, B.D. and Gross, M.R., Microsatellite Evolution in Vertebrates: Inference from AC Dinucleotide Repeats, Evolution, 2001, vol. 55, pp. 1717–1733.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Newman, R.A., and Squire, T., Microsatellite Variation and Fine-scale Population Structure in the Wood Frog (Rana sylvatica), Mol. Ecol., 2001, vol. 10, pp. 1087–1100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Roth, P., An Overview of the Systematics of the Bufo viridis Group in Middle and Central Asia, Studies in Herpetology. 6th Ord. Gen. Meet. Soc. Eur. Herp., Prague, 1986, pp. 127–130.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Roth, P. and Ráb P., Karyotype Analysis of the Bufo viridis Species Group: Systematic Implications. Studies in Herpetology. 6th Ord. Gen. Meet. Soc. Eur. Herp., Prague, 1986, pp. 131–136.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Rowe, G., Beebee, T.J.C., and Burke, T., A Further Four Polymorphic Microsatellite Loci in the Natterjack Toad Bufo calamita, Conserv. Genet., 1997, vol. 1, pp. 371–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Rowe, G., Beebee, T.J.C., and Burke, T., A Microsatellite Analysis of Natterjack Toad, Bufo calamita, Metapopulations. OIKOS, Copenhagen, 2000, vol. 88, pp. 641–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Scribner, K.T., Arntzen, J.W., and Burke, T., Comparative Analysis of Intra-and Inter-population Genetic Diversity in Bufo bufo Using Allozyme, Single Locus Microsatellite and Minisatellite, and Multilocus Minisatellite Data, Mol. Biol. Evol., 1994, vol.11, pp. 737–748.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Scribner, K.T., Arntzen, J.W., and Burke, T., Effective Number of Breeding Adults in Bufo bufo Estimated from Age-specific Variation at Minisatellite Loci, Mol. Ecol., 1997, vol. 6, pp. 701–712.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Scribner, K.T., Arntzen, J.W., Cruddace, N., et al., Environmental Correlates of Toad Abundance and Population Genetic Diversity, Biol. Conserv., 2001, vol. 98, pp. 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Scribner, K.T., and Pearce, J.M., Microsatellites: Evolutionary and Methodological Background and Empirical Applications at Individual, Population, and Phylogenetic Levels, Molecular Methods in Ecology, London: Blackwell Scientific, 2000, pp. 235–273.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Sherwood, S.W. and Patton, J.L., Genome Evolution in Pocket Gophers (Genus Thomomys). II. Variation in Cellular DNA Content, Chromosoma, 1982, vol. 85, pp. 163–179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Stöck, M., Untersuchungen zur Morphologie und Morphometrie di-und Tetraploider Grunkroten (Bufo viridis—Komplex) in Mittelasien (Amphibia: Anura: Bufonidae), Zool. Abhandl. Staatl. Museum für Tierk. Dresden, 1997, vol. 49, pp. 193–222.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Stöck, M., Mating Call Differences between Diploid and Tetraploid Toads (Bufo viridis Complex) in Middle Asia, Amphibia-Reptilia, 1998a, vol. 19, pp. 29–42.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Stöck, M., Tetraploid Toads (Bufo viridis Complex) from Northwestern China and Preliminary Taxonomic Conclusions for Bufo nouettei Mosquard, 1910, Zeitsch. Feldherpet., 1998b, vol. 5, pp. 139–166.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Stöck, M. and Grosse, W.-R., Erythrocyte Size and Ploidy Determination in Green Toads (Bufo viridis Complex) from Middle Asia, Alytes, 1997, vol. 15, pp. 72–90.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Stöck, M., Schmid, M., Steinlein, C., and Grosse, W.-R., Mosaicism in Somatic Triploid Specimens of the Bufo viridis Complex in the Karakoram with Examination of Calls, Morphology and Taxonomic Conclusions. Ital. J. Zool., 1999, vol. 66, pp. 215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Stöck, M., Frynta, D., Grosse, W.-R., et al., A Review of the Distribution of Diploid, Triploid and Tetraploid Green Toads (Bufo viridis Complex) in Asia Including New Data from Iran and Pakistan, Asiatic Herpet. Res., 2001a, vol. 9, pp. 77–100.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Stöck, M., Günther, R., and Böhme, W., Progress towards a Taxonomic Revision of the Asian Bufo viridis Group: Current Status of Nominal Taxa and Unsolved Problems (Amphibia: Anura: Bufonidae), Zool. Abhandl. Staatl. Museum für Tierk. Dresden. 2001b, vol. 51, pp. 253–319.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Stöck, M., Lamatsch, D.K., Steinlein, C., et al., A Bisexually Reproducing All-triploid Vertebrate, Nature Genetics, 2002, vol. 30, pp. 325–328.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Stöck, M., Steinlein, C., Lamatsch, D.K., et al., Multiple Origin of Tetraploid Taxa in the Eurasian Bufo viridis Subgroup, Genetica, 2005, vol. 124, pp. 255–272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Tikel, D., Paetkau, D., Cortinas, M.N., et al., Polymerase Chain Reaction Primers for Polymorphic Microsatellite Loci in the Invasive Toad Species Bufo marinus, Mol. Ecol., 2000, vol. 9, pp. 1927–1929.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Vinogradov, A.E., Borkin, L.Ya., Gunther, R., and Rozanov, Yu.M., Genome Elimination in Diploid and Triploid Rana esculenta Males: Cytological Evidence from DNA Flow Cytometry, Genome. 1990, vol. 33, pp. 619–627.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. N. Litvinchuk
    • 1
  • Yu. M. Rozanov
    • 1
  • N. M. Usmanova
    • 1
  • L. Ya. Borkin
    • 2
  • L. F. Mazanaeva
    • 3
  • V. I. Kazakov
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of CytologyRussian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Zoological InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia
  3. 3.Dagestan State UniversityMakhachkala, DagestanRussia

Personalised recommendations