Advertisement

Geography and Natural Resources

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 195–204 | Cite as

Environmental Impact Assessment of Economic Activity: Problems of Modeling and Mapping

  • A. K. CherkashinEmail author
Article
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

A theoretical framework for environmental impact assessment of economic activity is formulated by using methods of mathematical modeling and thematic mapping. Theoretically, environment is considered as a surface of variety (manifold), linking various factors and conditions. Tangential planes to the surface correspond to any natural systems (ecosystems), individual according to their connections with the environment (points of tangency). An example of the display of the environmental variety is provided by landscape-typological maps of a territory. The equation of the plane specifies connections of factor parameters of ecosystems by taking into account their shift relative to environmental coordinates of these reference points. Different types of systemic interpretations of these equations (types of models) are formed with various quantitative criteria for change of in environmental status, such as the measures of responsibility and effectiveness of decisions made. Environmental impact assessment methods generally estimate changes in the state of natural systems rather than the transformation of their environment. Therefore, methods of distinguishing relevant indicators and selecting the characteristic features of their controlled changes are suggested. The antisymmetry of variability and stability is naturally discernible from the factors and conditions of economic activity, which is demonstrated by modeling the impact of economic processes on the environmental status: an assessment was made of the influence of the size of gross regional product on amounts of atmospheric emissions of pollutants as well as of waste water discharges on human health. The findings can be used in developing methods of mathematical modeling of the relationships between the ecological, economic and social blocks of territorial systems in order to solve problems of thematic mapping and seek optimal solutions in the field of environmental management.

Keywords

environmental impact assessment mathematical modeling thematic mapping factors and conditions environmental variety 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Environmental Impact Assessment: Principles and Procedures, R.E. Munn, Ed., SCOPE 5, 2nd Ed., Chichester: Wiley, 1979.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vtorzhenie v Prirodnuyu Sredu: Otsenka Vozdeistviya. Osnovnay Polozheniaya (Intrusion Into the Natural Environment: Impact Assessment. Principles and Procedures), A.Yu. Reteyum, Ed., Moscow: Progress, 1983 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee, N., Environmental Impact Assessment: A Review, Appl. Geogr., 1983, vol. 3, issue 1, pp. 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Glasson, J., Therivel, R. and Chadwick, A., Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment (Natural and Built Environment Series), 3rd Ed., London; New York: Routledge. Taylor & Francis Group, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Maksimenko, Yu.L. and Gorkina, I.D., Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). Manual for Practical Workers, Moscow: REFIA, 1999 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dyakonov, K.N. and Doncheva, A.V., Ecological Projection and Examination: A Textbook for Universities, Moscow: Aspekt Press, 2002 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. URL: https://www.fWs.gov/r9esnepa/RelatedLegislativeAuthoritiesZnepa1969.PDF (Accessed February 18, 2018).
  8. 8.
    SNiP 1.02.01-85. On the Composition and Procedure of Developing, Reconciling and Approving the Designing Estimates for the Construction of Enterprises, Buildings and Facilities, Moscow: Gosstroi SSSR, 1985 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bronevoi, V.A., Vasilyev, S.A., Petrov, V.P., Ryabenko, A.E., Shanaurin, D.G., and Yurkin, E.A., Requirements for the Conduct of EIA and the Development of Design Documentation: Methodological Guidelines for Customers, Builders and Developers of Documentation, Moscow: NIA-Priroda, 2006 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Environmental Impact Assessment: Practice and Participation, 3rd Ed., K.S. Hanna, Ed., Oxford; Toronto: Oxford Univ. Press, 2016.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Principles of Environmental Impact Assessment. Best Practice, International Association for Impact Assessment in Cooperation With Institute of Environmental Assessment, UK, 1999. URL: https://www.iaia.org/uploads/pdf/principlesEA_1.pdf (Accessed June 12, 2018).
  12. 12.
    Environmental Impact Assessment and Ecological Examination, N.D. Sorokin, Ed., St. Petersburg: Integral, 2006 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Arnold, L. and Hanna, K., Best practices in Environmental Assessment: Case Studies and Application to Mining, Canadian International Resources and Development Institute (CIRDI) Report 2017-003, 2017. URL: http://ok-cear.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2018/01/Best-Practices-in-Environmental-Assessment.pdf (Accessed July 3, 2018).
  14. 14.
    Morrison-Saunders, A. and Arts J., Learning From Experience: Emerging Trends in Environmental Impact Assessment Follow-up, Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., 2005, vol. 23, issue 3, pp 170–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gibson, R.B., Doelle, M. and Sinclair, A.J., Fulfilling the Promise: Basic Components of Next Generation Environmental Assessment, JELP, vol. 29, issue 1, pp. 257–283Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bartlett, R.V. and Kurian, P.A., The Theory of Environmental Impact Assessment: Implicit Models of Policy Making, Policy & Politics, 1999, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 415–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moskvitina, M., GIS as a Tool for Environmental Impact Assessment: A Case Study of EIA Implementation for the Road Building Project in Strömstad, Sweden, Lunds Universitets Naturgeografiska Institution Seminarieuppsatser, Lund: Department of Physical Geography, Lund University Sölvegatan, 1999, no. 62.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Alkema, D., Geneletti, D., Cavallin, A., Van Asch, Th., Fabbri, A., Zanchi, A., De Amicis, M., Bonomi, T., De Francesch, F., Moltrer, A., and Tomasi, L., Integrated Datasets, GIS and 3-D System Analysis for Environmental Impact Assessment in a Large Alpine Valley North of Trento (Italy), Proc. Workshop “International Cooperation and Technology Transfer (February 2–5, 2000, Ljubljana), International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. XXXIII, part B7, pp. 54–62.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Symbaluk, M.D., Testing Landscape Modeling Approaches for Environmental Impact Assessment of Mining Land Use on Grizzly Bears (Ursus arctos horribilis) in the Foothills Region of West Central Alberta, Master of Science Thesis, Victoria: Royal Roads University, 2008.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Models of Natural Resource Management, V.I. Gurman, Ed., Moscow: Nauka, 1981 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    The Ecological-Economic Development Strategy for a Region: Mathematical Modeling and System Analysis as Exemplified by the Baikal Region, V.V. Bufal and V.I. Gurman, Eds., Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1990 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Modeling and Management of Processes of Regional Development, S.N. Vasilyev, Ed., Moscow: Fizmatgiz, 2001 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Environmental Impact Assessment, 2018. URL: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki (Accessed June 8, 2018) [in Russian].
  24. 24.
    Matveev, A.V. and Kotov, V.P., Environmental Impact Assessment and Ecological Examination, St. Petersburg: Izd. Sankt-Peterb. Gumanitar. Univ. Profsoyuzov, 2004 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sedov, V.V., The Fundamentals of Economic Theory. Questions of Ecologically Sustainable Development of the Economy, Chelyabinsk: Izd. Chelyab. Univ., 2005 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chernyavskaya, N.V., The Need and Possibility for Internalization of Ecological Externalities, Vestn. Chelyab. Univ., 2008, no. 29(130), issue 16, pp. 25–32 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sklyanova, I.P. and Cherkashin, A.K., Quantitative Evaluation of the Demographic Response to Changes in Living Conditions in Monotowns, Region: Ekonomika i Sotsiologiya, 2015, no. 4, pp. 179–197 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cherkashin, A.K., Geographical Environment and Territorial Organization of the Arctic, Geogr. Prir. Resur., 2015, no. 4, pp. 81–89 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Krivonozhko, V.E. and Lychev, A.V., Analysis of the Activity of Complex Socio-Economic Systems, Moscow: Izd. Mosk. Univ., 2010 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Krivonozhko, V.E., Propovoi, A.I., Sen’kov, R.V., Rodchenkov, I.V., and Anokhin, P.M., Analysis of the Effectiveness of Functioning of Complex Systems, Avtomatizatsiya Proektirovaniya, 1999, no. 1, pp. 2–7 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cherkashin, A.K. and Krasnoshtanova, N.E., Risk Assessment Models for Natural-Technical Systems, Geogr. Prir. Resur., 2014, no. 2, pp. 149–160 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Khil’mi, G.F., The Fundamentals of the Biosphere Physics, Leningrad: Nauka, 1966 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Galeev, E.M. and Tikhomirov, V.M., Optimization: Theory, Examples, Problems, Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2000 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cherkashin, A.K., Theory, Models and Methods for Analysis of the Territorial Organization of Society, Regional’nye Issledovaniya, 2016, no. 1(51), pp. 23–36 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cherkashin, A.K., Mathematical Bases for Knowledge Synthesis in Interdisciplinary Research Into Socio-Economic Phenomena, Zhurn. Ekonom. Teorii, 2017, no. 3, pp. 108–124 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rund, H., The Differential Geometry of Finsler Spaces, Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag OHG, 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cherkashin, A.K. and Myadzelets, A.V., Reconstructing a Nonlinear Dependence of the Quality of Life on the Socioeconomic Potential of Siberia’s Regions, Geogr. Prir. Resur., 2014, no. 4, pp. 122–130 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kalmykova, L.B., Influence of Socio-Economic Processes of a Region on the State of Environment, Statistika i Ekonomika, 2013, no. 5, pp. 158–162 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cherkashin, A.K. and Solodyankina, S.V., Functional Geography as a Direction of Theoretical Research and Modeling, Geogr. Prir. Resur., 2018, no. 2, pp. 181–190 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Grossman, G.M. and Krueger, A.B., Economic Growth and the Environment, Q. J. Econ., 1995, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 353–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Shkiperova, G.T., The Environmental Kuznets Curve as a Tool for Investigating the Regional Development, Ekonomicheskii Analiz: Teoriya i Praktika, 2013, vol. 12, issue 19, pp. 8–16 [in Russian].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.V. B. Sochava Institute of Geography, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of SciencesIrkutskRussia

Personalised recommendations