Advertisement

Geography and Natural Resources

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 99–105 | Cite as

Geography of World Economic Relations at the Turn of the 20th Century

  • L. M. SintserovEmail author
Article
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

This article deals with the geographical aspects of international trade and foreign investment at the turn of the 19th century. These issues of historical geography of the world economy are poorly explored in national science. It is shown that the widely held views of the critical importance of the colonies in foreign economic relations of the parent states are unsubstantiated and are not statistically sound. Neither in trade nor in capital investment did the colonies play the role that is often attributed to them. It is established that it is Europe rather than the colonial empires became the main structural element of the world economic system resulting from the industrial and transport-communication revolution. The world economic ties of those times are, in essence, the interrelations between European countries or with the participation of European countries. It is found that the colonial empires were economically open systems rather than closed systems, as is sometimes suggested. The characteristics of the internal structure of the world economic relations are identified. It is shown that raw and materials and food products were dominant in the commodity composition of international trade, whereas the structure of foreign investment was dominated by capital investment in the infrastructure. As far as direct foreign investments are concerned, however (which constituted a relatively small part of capital exports), they were made mainly in the primary sector of the economy. Furthermore, the counter flows of capital, that is, mutual investments of industrially developed countries, were uncommon. It is pointed out that the statement that capital was exported solely to poor and backward countries is misleading. On the contrary, as is established, most foreign investments were made in developed countries, according to the standards of those times.

Keywords

geography of world trade international division of labor geography of foreign investment colonies world economy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Nurkse, R., Equilibrium and Growth in the World Economy: Economic Essays, Series: Harvard Economic Studies, Vol. 118, Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1961.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kenwood, A.G. and Lougheed, A.L., The Growth of the International Economy, 1820–1990: An Introductory Text, 3rd Ed., London; New York: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hirschman, A.O., National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade, Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1945.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bairoch, P., Geographical Structure and Trade Balance of European Foreign Trade from 1800 to 1970, J. Eur. Econ. Hist., 1974, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 557–608.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Keynes, J.M., The Economic Consequences of the Peace, 1st Ed., London: Macmillan & Co., Limited, 1919.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dietrich, E.B., World Trade, New York: Henry Holt & Co., 1939.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Langenbeck, W., Geschichte des Welthandels der Neuzeit, Leipzig: J.J. Weber, 1926.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Annuaire Statistique de la France, Paris: Imprimerie nationale, 1911, vol. 31.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hobson, J.A., Imperialism: A Study, New York: James Pott & Co., 1902.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bairoch, P., Globalization Myths and Realities: One Century of External Trade and Foreign Investment, in States Against Markets: The Limits of Globalization, R. Boyer and D. Drache, Eds., London: Routledge, 1996, pp. 173–192.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thomas, B., The Historical Record of International Capital Movements to 1913, in Capital Movements and Economic Development, J.H. Adler and P.W. Kuznts, Eds., New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1967, pp. 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Svedberg, P., The Portfolio-Direct Composition of Private Foreign Investment in 1914 Revisited, Econ. J., 1978, vol. 88, issue 352, pp. 763–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    O’Rourke, K.H. and Williamson, J.G., Globalization and History: The Evolution of a Nineteenth-Century Atlantic Economy, Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lenin, V.I., Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism: A Popular Outline, in Selected Works, in 3 vols., vol. 1, Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1963, pp. 667–766.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Woodruff, W., Impact of Western Man: A Study of Europe’s Role in the World Economy, 1750–1960, New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1967.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kuznets, S., Modern Economic Growth: Rate, Structure and Spread, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Edelstein, M., Overseas Investment During the Pax Britannica: Size, Timing and Character, International Investment, Vermont: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 1990, pp. 25–60.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bairoch, P. and Kozul-Wright, R., Globalization Myths: Some Historical Reflections on Integration, Industrialization and Growth in the World Economy, UNCTAD Discussion Papers, 1996, no. 113.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shokarev, S., Foreign Capital in Russia in the Late 19th — Early 20th Centuries, Politekonom, 1997, nos. 3–4, pp. 119–130 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Obstfeld, M. and Taylor, A.M., Globalization and Capital Markets, in Globalization in Historical Perspective, M.D. Bordo, A.M. Taylor and J.G. Williamson, Eds., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003, pp. 121–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of GeographyRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations