Advertisement

Regular and Chaotic Dynamics

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 390–409 | Cite as

Realizing nonholonomic dynamics as limit of friction forces

  • Jaap Eldering
Article

Abstract

The classical question whether nonholonomic dynamics is realized as limit of friction forces was first posed by Carathéodory. It is known that, indeed, when friction forces are scaled to infinity, then nonholonomic dynamics is obtained as a singular limit.

Our results are twofold. First, we formulate the problem in a differential geometric context. Using modern geometric singular perturbation theory in our proof, we then obtain a sharp statement on the convergence of solutions on infinite time intervals. Secondly, we set up an explicit scheme to approximate systems with large friction by a perturbation of the nonholonomic dynamics. The theory is illustrated in detail by studying analytically and numerically the Chaplygin sleigh as an example. This approximation scheme offers a reduction in dimension and has potential use in applications.

Keywords

nonholonomic dynamics friction constraint realization singular perturbation theory Lagrange mechanics 

MSC2010 numbers

37J60 70F40 37D10 70H09 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Appell, P., Exemple de mouvement d’un point assujetti à une liaison exprimée par une relation non linéaire entre les composantes de la vitesse, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo, 1911, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 48–50.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arnold, V. I., Ordinary Differential Equations, Berlin: Springer, 2006.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Borisov, A.V., Karavaev, Yu. L., Mamaev, I. S., Erdakova, N.N., Ivanova, T. B., and Tarasov, V.V., Experimental Investigation of the Motion of a Body with an Axisymmetric Base Sliding on a Rough Plane, Regul. Chaotic Dyn., 2015, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 518–541.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bloch, A.M., Nonholonomic Mechanics and Control, Interdiscip. Appl. Math., vol. 24, New York: Springer, 2003.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bloch, A. M., Nonholonomic Mechanics, Dissipation and Quantization, in Advances in the Theory of Control, Signals and Systems with Physical Modeling, Lect. Notes Control Comput. Sci., vol. 407, Berlin: Springer, 2010, pp. 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bloch, A.M., Marsden, J.E., Zenkov, D.V., Quasivelocities and Symmetries in Non-Holonomic Systems, Dyn. Syst., 2009, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 187–222.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bloch, A. M. and Rojo, A. G., Quantization of a Nonholonomic System, Phys. Rev. Lett., 2008, vol. 101, no. 3, 030402, 4 pp.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brendelev, V. N., On the Realization of Constraints in Nonholonomic Mechanics, J. Appl. Math. Mech., 1981, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 351–355; see also: Prikl. Mat. Mekh., 1981, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 481–487.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bou-Rabee, N. M., Marsden, J.E., Romero, L.A., Dissipation-Induced Heteroclinic Orbits in Tippe Tops, SIAM Rev., 2008, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 325–344.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carathéodory, C., Der Schlitten, Z. Angew. Math. Mech., 1933, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cushman, R., Duistermaat, H., and Sniatycki, J., Geometry of Nonholonomically Constrained Systems, Adv. Ser. Nonlinear Dynam., vol. 26, Hackensack,N.J.: World Sci., 2010.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chaplygin, S.A., On the Theory ofMotion of Nonholonomic Systems. The Reducing-Multiplier Theorem, Regul. Chaotic Dyn., 2008, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 369–376; see also: Mat. Sb., 1912, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 303–314.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    de León, M., A Historical Review on Nonholomic Mechanics, Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat. Ser. A Math. RACSAM, 2012, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 191–224.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eldering, J., Normally Hyperbolic Invariant Manifolds: The Noncompact Case, Atlantis Studies in Dynamical Systems, vol. 2, Paris: Atlantis Press, 2013.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fenichel, N., Persistence and Smoothness of Invariant Manifolds for Flows, Indiana Univ. Math. J., 1971/1972, vol. 21, pp. 193–226.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fenichel, N., Geometric Singular Perturbation Theory for Ordinary Differential Equations, J. Differential Equations, 1979, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 53–98.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fedorov, Yu.N. and García-Naranjo, L.C., The Hydrodynamic Chaplygin Sleigh, J. Phys. A, 2010, vol. 43, no. 43, 434013, 18 pp.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fufaev, N.A., On the Possibility of Realizing a Nonholonomic Constraint by Means of Viscous Friction Forces, J. Appl. Math. Mech., 1964, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 630–632; see also: Prikl. Mat. Mekh., 1964, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 513–515.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hirsch, M.W., Pugh, C.C., and Shub, M., Invariant Manifolds, Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 583, New York: Springer, 1977.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Karapetian, A.V., On Realizing Nonholonomic Constraints by Viscous Friction Forces and Celtic Stones Stability, J. Appl. Math. Mech., 1981, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 30–36; see also: Prikl. Mat. Mekh., 1981, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 42–51.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kobayashi, Sh. and Nomizu, K., Foundations of Differential Geometry: Vol. 1, New York: Wiley, 1996.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kozlov, V.V. and Neishtadt, A. I., Realization of Holonomic Constraints, J. Appl. Math. Mech., 1990, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 705–708; see also: Prikl. Mat. Mekh., 1990, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 858–861.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kozlov, V.V., Dynamics of Systems with Nonintegrable Constraints: 1, Mosc. Univ. Mech. Bull., 1982, vol. 37, nos. 3–4, pp. 27–34; see also: Vestn. Mosk. Univ. Ser. 1. Mat. Mekh., 1982, no. 3, pp. 92–100.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kozlov, V.V., Dynamics of Systems with Nonintegrable Constraints: 2, Mosc. Univ. Mech. Bull., 1982, vol. 37, nos. 3–4, pp. 74–80; see also: Vestn. Mosk. Univ. Ser. 1. Mat. Mekh., 1982, no. 4, pp. 70–76.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kozlov, V.V., Realization of Nonintegrable Constraints in Classical Mechanics, Sov. Phys. Dokl., 1983, vol. 28, pp. 735–737; see also: Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1983, vol. 272, no. 3, pp. 550–554.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kozlov, V.V., On the Realization of Constraints in Dynamics, J. Appl. Math. Mech., 1992, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 594–600; see also: Prikl. Mat. Mekh., 1992, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 692–698.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kozlov, V.V., Notes on Dry Friction and Nonholonomic Constraints, Nelin. Dinam., 2010, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 903–906 (Russian).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lewis, A.D. and Murray, R.M., Variational Principles for Constrained Systems: Theory and Experiment, Internat. J. Non-Linear Mech., 1995, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 793–815.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Marle, Ch.-M., Various Approaches to Conservative and Nonconservative Nonholonomic Systems, Rep. Math. Phys., 1998, vol. 42, nos. 1–2, pp. 211–229.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Neimark, Ju. I. and Fufaev, N.A., Dynamics of Nonholonomic Systems, Trans. Math. Monogr., vol. 33, Providence,R.I.: AMS, 1972.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rubin, H. and Ungar, P., Motion under a Strong Constraining Force, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 1957, vol. 10, pp. 65–87.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ruina, A., Nonholonomic Stability Aspects of Piecewise Holonomic Systems, Rep. Math. Phys., 1998, vol. 42, nos. 1–2, pp. 91–100.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sidek, N. and Sarkar, N., Dynamic Modeling and Control of Nonholonomic Mobile Robot with Lateral Slip, in ICONS’08: Third International Conference on Systems (Cancún, Mexico, April 2008), pp. 35–40.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Takens, F., Motion under the Influence of a Strong Constraining Force, in Global Theory of Dynamical Systems: Proc. Internat. Conf. (Northwestern Univ., Evanston, Ill., 1979), Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 819, Berlin: Springer, 1980, pp. 425–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tikhonov, A.N., Systems of Differential Equations Containing Small Parameters in the Derivatives, Mat. Sb. (N. S.), 1952, vol. 31(73), no. 3, pp. 575–586 (Russian).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Vershik, A. M. and Gershkovich, V.Ya., Nonholonomic Problems and the Theory of Distributions, Acta Appl. Math., 1988, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 181–209.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wang, J.-Ch. and Huang, H.-P., Creep Dynamics of Nonholonomic Systems, in Proc. of the 1996 IEEE Internat. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (Minneapolis,Minn., 22–28 Apr, 1996): Vol. 4, pp. 3452–3457.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidade de São Paulo — ICMCSao CarlosBrazil

Personalised recommendations