Regular and Chaotic Dynamics

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 116–139 | Cite as

The dynamics of a rigid body with a sharp edge in contact with an inclined surface in the presence of dry friction

Article

Abstract

In this paper we consider the dynamics of a rigid body with a sharp edge in contact with a rough plane. The body can move so that its contact point is fixed or slips or loses contact with the support. In this paper, the dynamics of the system is considered within three mechanical models which describe different regimes of motion. The boundaries of the domain of definition of each model are given, the possibility of transitions from one regime to another and their consistency with different coefficients of friction on the horizontal and inclined surfaces are discussed.

Keywords

rod Painlevé paradox dry friction loss of contact frictional impact 

MSC2010 numbers

70F40 70E18 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bolotoff, E. A., Sur le mouvement d’une figure matérielle plane. Les effets du frottement de glissement, Mat. Sb., 1906, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 562–708 (Russian).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    de Sparre, Sur le frottement de glissement, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 1905, vol. 141, pp. 310–312.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fufaev, N.A., Dynamics of the System in the Painlevé - Klein Example: The Painlevé Paradoxes, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR. Mekh. Tverd. Tela, 1991, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 45–50 (Russian).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Genot, F. and Brogliato, B., New Results on Painlevé Paradoxes, Eur. J. Mech. A Solids, 1999, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 653–677.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ivanov, A.P., Bifurcations in Systems with Friction: Basic Models and Methods, Regul. Chaotic Dyn., 2009, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 656–672.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ivanov, A.P., On Detachment Conditions in the Problem on the Motion of a Rigid Body on a Rough Plane, Regul. Chaotic Dyn., 2008, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 355–368.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ivanov, A.P., Fundamentals of the Theory of Systems with Friction, Moscow-Izhevsk: R&C Dynamics, Institute of Computer Science, 2011 (Russian).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ivanov, A.P., The Conditions for the Unique Solvability of the Equations of the Dynamics of Systems with Friction, Prikl. Mat. Mekh., 2008, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 531–546 [J. Appl. Math. Mech., 2008, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 372–382].MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ivanov, A.P., Shuvalov, N.D., and Ivanova, T.B., On Detachment Conditions of a Top on an Absolutely Rough Support, Vestn. Udmurtsk. Univ. Mat. Mekh. Komp. Nauki, 2012, no. 3, pp. 103–113 (Russian).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kessler, P. and O’Reilly, O.M., The Ringing of Euler’s Disk, Regul. Chaotic Dyn., 2002, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 49–60.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lecornu, L., Sur le frottement de glissement, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 1905, vol. 140, pp. 635–637.MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Neimark, Yu. I., Painlevé Paradoxes Revisited, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR. Mekh. Tverd. Tela, 1995, no. 1, pp. 17–21 [Mech. Solids, 1995, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 1–15].Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Neimark, Yu. I. and Fufaev, N.A., Painlevé Paradoxes and the Dynamics of a Brake Shoe, Prikl. Mat. Mekh., 1995, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 366–375 [J. Appl. Math. Mech., 1995, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 343–352].MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Painlevé, P., Leçons sur le frottement, Paris: Hermann, 1895.MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pfeifer, F., Zur Frage der sogenannten Coulombshen Reibungsgesetze, Ztschr. f. Math. u. Physik, 1909, vol. 58, p. 273.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Le Suan An’, Painlevé Paradoxes and the Law of Motion of Mechanical Systems with Coulomb Friction, Prikl. Mat. Mekh., 1990, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 520–529 [J Appl. Math. Mech., 1990, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 430–438].MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kuleshov, A. S., Treschev, D.V., Ivanova, T. B., and Naimushina, O. S., A Rigid Cylinder on a Viscoelastic Plane, Rus. J. Nonlin. Dyn., 2011, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 601–625 (Russian).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Song, P., Kraus, P., and Kumar, V., Analysis of Rigid Body Dynamic Models for Simulation of Systems with Frictional Contacts, J. Appl. Mech., 2000, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 118–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Or, Y., Painlevé’s Paradox and Dynamic Jamming in Simple Models of Passive DynamicWalking, Regul. Chaotic Dyn., 2014, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 64–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Or, Y. and Rimon, E., Investigation of Painlevé’s Paradox and Dynamic Jamming during Mechanism Sliding Motion, Nonlinear Dynam., 2012, vol. 67, pp. 1647–1668.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rozenblat, G.M., On the Motion of a Two-Dimensional Rigid Body on a Rough Straight Line, Nelin. Dinam., 2006, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 293–306 (Russian).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Samsonov, V.A., The Dynamics of a Brake Shoe and “impact generated by friction”, J. Appl. Math. Mech., 2005, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 816–824.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Samsonov, V.A., Issues on Mechanics: Some Problems, Phenomena, and Paradoxes, Moscow: Nauka, 1980 (Russian).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stewart, D. E., Dynamics with Inequalities: Impacts and Hard Constraints, Philadelphia, PA: SIAM, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Thiry, R., Étude d’un probl`eme particulier ou intervient le frottement de glissement, Nouv. Ann. de Math., Sér. 5, 1922, vol. 1, pp. 208–216.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhao, Zh., Liu, C., Ma, W., and Chen, B., Experimental Investigation of the Painlevé Paradox in a Robotic System, Trans. ASME J. Appl. Mech., 2008, vol. 75, 041006, 11 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Computer ScienceUdmurt State UniversityIzhevskRussia
  2. 2.Faculty of Physics and EnergeticsUdmurt State UniversityIzhevskRussia

Personalised recommendations