Physics of Particles and Nuclei Letters

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 168–174 | Cite as

Increase in the detection efficiency for the KL0 → π0νν̃ decay in the E391 experiment

  • Yu. Yu. Stepanenko
  • A. S. Kurilin
  • S. V. Podolsky
Methods of Physical Experiment
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

One of the main aims of the Е391 experiment data analysis is to attain the calculated level of the setup sensitivity to the rare KL0 → π0νν̃ decay. To this end, we have performed a repeated analysis of the collected data, which has resulted in a 65% increase in sensitivity when compared to the standard E391 data analysis. In this work we present the main concept of the data re-analysis that has allowed an increase in the E391 setup sensitivity and describe in general the methods used.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. J. Buras, “CP violation and rare decays of K and B mesons,” arXiv:hep-ph/9905437 (1999).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. J. Buras, D. Buttazzo, J. Girrbach-Noe, and R. Knegjens, “K +→π+νῦ and K L→π0νῦ in the standard model: status and perspectives,” arXiv:1503.02693 [hep-ph] (2015).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. Inagaki et al. (E391a Collab.), “KEK-E391 proposal 1996,” KEK-Internal 96-13 (1996).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. K. Ahn et al. (E391a Collab.), “Experimental study of the decay K L 0→π0νῦ,” Phys. Rev. D 81, 072004 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. V. Podolsky, A. S. Kurilin, and Yu. Yu. Stepanenko, “Method of reconstructing direction of gamma quanta registered by the CsI-calorimeter of E391 experiment,” Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 8, 46–49 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. S. Medvedev and V. G. Potemkin, Neuron Networks. MATLAB6 (Dialog-MIFI, Moscow, 2002) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. V. Maksimenko, A. S. Kurilin, S. V. Podolsky, V. V. Andreev, A. A. Yuchko, K. S. Babich, and Yu. Yu. Stepanenko, “New method for the cuts threshold optimization in the E391 experiment: conception and current implementation,” Probl. Phys. Math. Tech., No. 3, 22–24 (2010). www.mathnet.ru/eng/pfmt179.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. Morii, “Experimental study of the decay K L 0→π0νῦ,” PhD Thesis (Kyoto Univ., 2010).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Comfort et al. (E14 Collab.), Proposal for K L 0→π0νῦ Experiment at J-Parc. http://j-parc.jp/researcher/Hadron/en/pac_0606/pdf/p14-Yamanaka.pdf. Cited 2006.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu. Yu. Stepanenko
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. S. Kurilin
    • 1
  • S. V. Podolsky
    • 3
  1. 1.Joint Institute for Nuclear ResearchDubnaRussia
  2. 2.Gomel State UniversityGomelBelarus
  3. 3.Brookhaven National LaboratoryUptonUSA

Personalised recommendations