Physics of Particles and Nuclei Letters

, Volume 11, Issue 6, pp 722–729 | Cite as

Uncertainties of Drell-Yan production cross section in pp collisions at the LHC

  • V. F. Konoplyanikov
  • M. V. Savina
  • S. V. ShmatovEmail author
  • S. G. Shulga
Physics of Elementary Particles and Atomic Nuclei. Experiment


The results of calculations of uncertainties of the Drell-Yan production cross section at the energy √s = 13 TeV are presented. Systematic errors related to uncertainties in the quark and gluon distribution functions, the choice of the QCD factorization scale, and the QCD running coupling constant are considered.


Invariant Mass Nucleus Letter Parton Distribution Function Gluon Distribution Function Library LHAPDF 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    S. D. Drell and T. -M. Yan, “Massive lepton-pair production in hadron-hadron collisions at high energies,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 25(5), 316 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. Boos, M. Dubinin, L. Dudko, A. Ershov, A. Gribushin, V. Ilyin, V. Klyukhin, O. Kodolova, I. Lokhtin, S. Petrushanko, L. Sarycheva, V. Savrin, A. Snigirev, and I. Vardanyan, “CMS physics technical design report, volume II: Physics performance,” J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 34, 995–1579 (2007); I. A. Golutvin, V. V. Palichik, M. V. Savina, and S. V. Shmatov “Search for new neutral gauge bosons at LHC,” Phys. At. Nucl, 70 (1), 56 (2007); S. V. Shmatov, “Searches for extra dimensions in the CMS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC),” Phys. At. Nucl, 74 (3), 490 (2011); S. V. Shmatov, “Searches for physics beyond the Standard Model in proton-proton interactions at √s = 7 TeV in the CMS experiment at the LHC,” Phys. At. Nucl, 76 (9), 1106 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. Melnikov and F. Petriello, “Electroweak gauge boson production at hadron colliders through OS2,” Phys. Rev. D 74, 114017 (2006); S. Catani, L. Cieri, G. Ferrera, D. De Florian, and M. Grazzini, “Vector boson production at hadron colliders: a fully exclusive QCD calculation at NNLO,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 082001 (2009); V. S. Catani and M. Grazzini, “An NNLO subtraction formalism in hadron collisions and its application to Higgs boson production at the LHC,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 222002 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re, “NLO vectorboson production matched with shower in POWHEG,” JHEP 0807, 060 (2008).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Gavin, Y. Li, F. Petriello, and S. Quackenbush, “FEWZ 2.0: a code for hadronic Z production at next-to-next-to-leading order,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 182, 2388 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the Drell-Yan cross section in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV,” JHEP 10, 007 (2011) [arXiv:1108.0566]; CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the differential and double-differential Drell-Yan cross sections in proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV,” JHEP 12, 030 (2013) [arXiv:1310.7291].ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    ATLAS Collaboration, “Measurement of the highmass Drell-Yan differential cross-section in pp collisions at √s =7 TeV,” Phys. Lett. B 725, 223–242 (2013) [arXiv:1305.4192].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Pumplin, D. R. Stump, J. Huston, H. L. Lai, P. Nadolsky, and W. K. Tung, “New generation of parton distributions with uncertainties from global QCD analysis,” JHEP 0207, 012 (2002) [ArXiv: hep-ph/0201195]; CT10 NLO and NNLO Parton Distribution Functions. ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Martin-Stirling-Thorne-Watt Parton Distribution Functions.
  10. 10.
    Neural Network Parton Distribution Functions.
  11. 11.
    H. Plothow-Besch, “PDFLIB: a library of all available parton density functions of the nucleon, the pion and the photon and the corresponding αS calculations,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 75, 396–416 (1993).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Alwall, A. Ballestrero, P. Bartalini, S. Belov, E. Boos, A. Buckley, J. M. Butterworth, L. Dudko, S. Frixione, L. Garren, S. Gieseke, A. Gusev, I. Hinchliffe, J. Huston, B. Kersevan, F. Krauss, N. Lavesson, L. Lönnblad, E. Maina, F. Maltoni, M. L. Mangano, F. Moortgat, S. Mrenna, C. G. Papadopoulos, R. Pittau, P. Richardson, M. H. Seymour, A. Sherstnev, T. Sjöstrand, P. Skands, S. R. Slabospitsky, Z. Wcas, B. R. Webber, M. Worek, and D. Zeppenfeld, “A standard format for Les Houches event files,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 176, 300–304 (2007) [arXiv:hep-ph/0609017]; E. Boos, M. Dobbs, W. Giele, I. Hinchliffe, J. Huston, V. Ilyin, J. Kanzaki, K. Kato, Y. Kurihara, L. Lönnblad, M. Mangano, S. Mrenna, F. Paige, E. Richter-Was, M. Seymour, T. Sjöstrand, B. Webber, and D. Zeppenfeld, “Generic user process interface for event generators,” arXiv:hep-ph/0109068.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    The Les Houches Accord PDF Interface.
  14. 14.
    D. Stump, J. Huston, J. Pumplin, Wu-Ki. Tung, H. L. Lai, S. Kuhlmann, and J. F. Owens, “Inclusive jet production, parton distributions, and the search for new physics,” JHEP 0310, 046 (2003) [arXiv:hepph/0303013].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    P. M. Nadolsky, H. -L. Lai, Q. -H. Cao, J. Huston, J. Pumplin, D. Stump, W. -K. Tung, and C. -P. Yuan, “Implications of CTEQ global analysis for collider observables,” Phys. Rev. D 78, 013004 (2008) [arXiv:0802.0007].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    H. -L. Lai, M. Guzzi, J. Huston, Z. Li, P. M. Nadolsky, J. Pumplin, and C. -P. Yuan, “New parton distributions for collider physics,” Phys. Rev. D 82, 074024 (2010) [arXiv:1007.2241]; CTEQ Parton Distribution Functions: CT10. Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. D. Martin, W. J. Stirling, R. S. Thorne, and G. Watt, “Parton distributions for the LHC,” Eur. Phys. J. C 63, 189 (2009) [arXiv:0901.0002].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. D. Ball, V. Bertone, S. Carrazza, C. S. Deans, L. Del Debbio, S. Forte, A. Guffanti, N. P. Hartland, J. I. Latorre, J. Rojo, and M. Ubiali, “Parton distributions with LHC data,” arXiv:1207.1303 [hep-ph].Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    H. -L. Lai, M. Guzzi, J. Huston, Z. Li, P. M. Nadolsky, J. Pumplin, and C. -P. Yuan, “New parton distributions for collider physics,” Phys. Rev. D: Part. Fields 82, 074024 (2010) [arXiv:1007.2241].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    J. Gao, M. Guzzi, J. Huston, H. -L. Lai, Z. Li, P. Nadolsky, J. Pumplin, D. Stump, and C. -P. Yuan, “The CT10 NNLO global analysis of QCD,” arXiv:1302.6246.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    R. D. Ball, V. Bertone, L. Del Debbio, S. Forte, A. Guffanti, J. I. Latorre, S. Lionetti, J. Rojo, and M. Ubiali, “Precision NNLO determination of alphas (MZ) using an unbiased global parton set,” Phys. Lett. B 707, 66–71 (2012) [arXiv:1110.2483].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. Botje, J. Butterworth, A. Cooper-Sarkar, A. De Roeck, J. Feltesse, S. Forte, A. Glazov, J. Huston, R. McNulty, T. Sjostrand, and R. Thorne, “The PDF44LHC working group interim recommendations,” arXiv:1101.0538.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. D. Martin, W. J. Stirling, R. S. Thorne, and G. Watt, “Uncertainties on αS in global PDF analysis and implications for predicted hadronic cross sections,” Eur. Phys. J. C 64 653–680 (2000) [arXiv:0905.3531].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. F. Konoplyanikov
    • 1
  • M. V. Savina
    • 1
  • S. V. Shmatov
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. G. Shulga
    • 1
  1. 1.Joint Institute for Nuclear ResearchDubna, Moscow oblastRussia

Personalised recommendations