Advertisement

Physics of Particles and Nuclei Letters

, Volume 3, Issue 5, pp 305–311 | Cite as

Proposal on the measurements of d–p elastic scattering analyzing powers at 0.3–2.0 GeV at the Internal Target Station of the Nuclotron

  • T. Uesaka
  • V. P. Ladygin
  • L. S. Azhgirey
  • Yu. V. Gurchin
  • A. Yu. Isupov
  • K. Itoh
  • M. Janek
  • J. -T. Karachuk
  • T. Kawabata
  • A. N. Khrenov
  • A. S. Kiselev
  • V. Kizka
  • J. Kliman
  • V. A. Krasnov
  • A. N. Livanov
  • Y. Maeda
  • A. I. Malakhov
  • V. Matoucek
  • M. Morhac
  • S. Nedev
  • S. Rangelov
  • S. G. Reznikov
  • S. Sakaguchi
  • H. Sakai
  • Y. Sasamoto
  • K. Sekiguchi
  • K. Suda
  • I. Turzo
  • T. A. Vasiliev
  • T. Wakui
Article

Abstract

A new high-energy beam polarimeter is proposed for Nuclotron, which uses the Internal Target Station (ITS). This polarimeter based on a measurement of asymmetry for the d–p elastic scattering will allow one to measure simultaneously both vector and tensor components of deuteron beam polarization. For this purpose an analyzing powers measurement for the d–p elastic scattering at energies T d = 0.88–2 GeV is proposed. The precise measurements of the deuteron analyzing powers over the energy range T d = 300–2000 MeV can give an irreplaceable clue to the study of the spin dependence of three nucleon forces.

PACS numbers

21.45.+v 25.45.-z 24.10.jv 24.70.+s 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    V. G. Ableev et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 306, 73 (1991).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. S. Azhgirey et al., PTE 1, 51 (1997); Instr. Exp. Tech. 40, 43 (1997); Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 497, 340 (2003).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. S. Zolin et al., JINR Rapid Commun. 2(88), 27 (1998); Yu. K. Pilipenko et al., AIP Conf. Proc. 570, 801 (2001).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. Sakamoto et al., Phys. Lett. B 367, 60 (2001).MathSciNetCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. Suda et al., AIP Conf. Proc 570, 806 (2001); RIKEN Accel. Prog. Rep. 35, 174 (2002).ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Sekiguchi et al., Phys. Rev. C 65, 034003 (2002).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. P. Ladygin, in Proc. of the XV Intern. Sem. on High Energy Physics Problems, Dubna, Sept. 25–29, 2000 (Dubna, 2001), Vol. 2, p. 301.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. P. Ladygin et al., in Proc. of the Intern. Workshop “Relativistic Nucl. Phys.: From Hundreds of MeV to TeV,” Varna, Bulgaria, Sept. 10–16, 2001 (Dubna, 2001), Vol. 1, p. 131.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Sakai et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5288 (2000).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Sekiguchi et al., Phys. Rev. 70, 014001 (2004).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    K. Hatanaka and Y. Shimizu, et al., Phys. Rev. C 66, 044002 (2002).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. Bieber et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 606 (2000).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. Ermisch et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5862 (2001).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    K. Ermisch et al., Phys. Rev. 68, 051001 (2003).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Bleszynski et al., Phys. Lett. A 87, 178 (1979).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Bleszynski et al., Phys. Lett. A 106, 42 (1981).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Haji-Saied et al., Phys. Rev. 36, 2010 (1987).ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    V. Ghazikhanian et al., Phys. Rev. 43, 1532 (1987).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    N. E. Booth et al., Phys. Rev. D 4, 1261 (1971).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    J. S. Vincent et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 24, 236 (1970).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    E. Winkelmann et al., Phys. Rev. 21, 2535 (1980).ADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    G. W. Bennett et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 387 (1967).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yu. S. Anisimov et al., in Proc. of the 7 Intern. Workshop on Relativistic Nuucl. Phys., Stara Lesna, Slovak Republic, Aug. 25–30, 2003, pp. 117.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. N. Khrenov et al., in Proc. of the 7 Intern. Workshop on Relativistic Nucl. Phys., Stara Lesna, Slovak Republic, Aug. 25–30, 2003, p. 236.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    T. Uesaka et al., PHe3 Project (unpublished).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    V. P. Ladygin and S. Nedev, Part. Nucl. Lett. 2(111), 13 (2002).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Uesaka
    • 1
  • V. P. Ladygin
    • 2
  • L. S. Azhgirey
    • 2
  • Yu. V. Gurchin
    • 2
  • A. Yu. Isupov
    • 2
  • K. Itoh
    • 7
  • M. Janek
    • 2
    • 3
  • J. -T. Karachuk
    • 2
    • 4
  • T. Kawabata
    • 1
  • A. N. Khrenov
    • 2
  • A. S. Kiselev
    • 2
  • V. Kizka
    • 2
  • J. Kliman
    • 2
    • 5
  • V. A. Krasnov
    • 2
  • A. N. Livanov
    • 2
  • Y. Maeda
    • 1
  • A. I. Malakhov
    • 2
  • V. Matoucek
    • 5
  • M. Morhac
    • 5
  • S. Nedev
    • 6
  • S. Rangelov
    • 6
  • S. G. Reznikov
    • 2
  • S. Sakaguchi
    • 1
  • H. Sakai
    • 1
  • Y. Sasamoto
    • 1
  • K. Sekiguchi
    • 8
  • K. Suda
    • 1
  • I. Turzo
    • 5
  • T. A. Vasiliev
    • 1
  • T. Wakui
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Nuclear StudyUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Joint Institute for Nuclear ResearchDubnaRussia
  3. 3.P. J. Šafarik UniversityKošiceSlovakia
  4. 4.Advanced Research Institute for Electrical EngineeringBucharestRomania
  5. 5.Institute of PhysicsSlovak Academy of SciencesBratislavaSlovakia
  6. 6.University of Chemical Technology and MetallurgySofiaBulgaria
  7. 7.Saitama UniversitySaitamaJapan
  8. 8.Institute for Physical and Chemical Research (RIKEN)SaitamaJapan

Personalised recommendations