Geology of Ore Deposits

, Volume 51, Issue 4, pp 317–329 | Cite as

The precambrian metallogeny of India

  • S. I. Turchenko
  • A. B. Vrevsky
  • V. B. Dagelaisky


The data on the Precambrian metallogeny of India are integrated in order to provide insights into its basic principles and to create a digital cartographic representation of the results obtained. The description of an electronic map of the Precambrian of India on a scale of 1: 5000000 is an example of the creation of a GIS-oriented database on the geology and tectonics, isotopic age, and minerageny of the Precambrian rocks of continents. Precambrian geological and tectonic bodies are individualized as the main ore-bearing structural elements assigned for typification, systematics, ranking, classification, correlation, and demarcation of territories differing in geological features. The metallogenic information on Precambrian provinces of India is considered at three formalized levels: metallogenic provinces, zones, and mineral deposits located in typical structural elements. Each object is accompanied by a spatiotemporal model of tectonic and metallogenic evolution characterized by isotopic dating with various degrees of accuracy.


Greenstone Belt PbZn Dharwar Craton Schist Belt Indian Shield 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R. D. Beckinsale, G. Reeves-Smith, N. H. Galt, R. L. W. Hott, and B. Thompson, “Rb-Sr and Pb-Pb Whole Rock Isochron Ages and REE Data from the Archaean Gneisses and Granites, Karnataka State, South India,” in INDO-US Workship on Precambrian of South India (NGRI, Hyderabad, 1982), pp. 35–36.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Y. J. Bhaskar Rao, K. Naha, R. Srinivasan, and K. Gopalan, “Geology, Geochemistry and Geochronology of the Archaean Peninsula Gneiss around Gorur, Hassan District, Karnataka, India,” Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., Earth and Planet. Sci., 46–57 (1991).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. G. Bhoskar, Metallogeny in the Southern Part of Central Indian Precambrian Shield (Hyderabad, 1999).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. R. Chadwick, “Structural and Metamorphic Relations between Sargur and Dharwar Supracrustal Rocks and Peninsular Gneiss in Central Karnataka,” J. Geol. Soc. India 22(12), 557–569 (1981).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Deb, “Crustal Evolution and Precambrian Metallogenesis in Western India,” Rev. Bras. Geosci. 12(1–3), 94–104 (1982).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. Divakara Rao and P. Rama Rao, “Granitic Activity and Crustal Growth in the Indian Shield,” Precambr. Res. 16, 257–271 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. A. Drury, N. B. W. Harris, R. W. Holt, et al., “Precambrian Tectonics and Crustal Evolution in South India,” J. Geol. 92, 3–20 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Early Precambrian Supracrustals of Southern Karnataka, Ed. by J. Swaminath and M. Ramakrishnan, (Mem. Geol. Surv. India, Calcutta, 1981).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Geological and Mineral Map of Karnataka and Goa on a Scale of 1: 500000, Expl. Brochure. (Geol. Surv. India, 1981).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. G. Ghosh, “3.56 Ga Tonalite in the Central Part of the Bastar Craton, India: Oldest Indian Date,” J. Asian Earth Sci. 23, 359–364 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Ghosh, D. V. Rundqvist, V. B. Dagelaisky, et al., “Precambrian Metallogenic Zoning Map of India: A Component of CGMW World Atlas,” in Proceedings of International Seminar and Field Workshop on the Precambrian Continental Crust in Eastern and Central India, UNESCO-IUGS-IGC 386 (Bhubaneswar, 1999), pp. 188–192.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. M. Hussain and S. M. Naqvi, “Geological, Geophysical and Geochemical Studies over the Holenarasipur Schist Belt, Dharwar Craton, India,” Geol. Soc. India Mem. 4, 73–95 (1983).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. V. P. Iyengar, “Ore Bearing Tectonic Structures of the Precambrian India,” in Proceedings of Symposium on Metallogeny of the Precambrian, IGCP Project-91 (Bengalore, 1982), Key Paper I-XXII.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. H. Jaffri, N. Khan, S. M. Ahmed, and R. Saxena, “Geological and Geochemistry of Nuggihalli Schist Belt, Dharwar Craton,” Geol. Soc. India Mem. 4, 110–120 (1983).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. S. Janardhan, “Evolution of Archaean Lithosphere: South India,” in Indian Lithosphere (1986), pp. 40–51.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    K. K. Mukherjee and T. K. Sen, “A Genetic Model of Copper Mineralization and Associated Protolith in the Singhbhum Metallogenic Province, Eastern India,” Indian J. Earth Sci. 12(3), 205–216 (1985).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    K. Naha, R. Srinivasan, and S. Jayaram, “Sedimentation, Structural and Migmatitic History of Archaean Dharvar Tectonic Province, India,” Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., Earth and Planet. Sci., 100, pp. 413–433 (1991).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. M. Naqvi, “Early Archaean Evolution of Indian Shield with Special Reference to Dharwar Craton,” Rev. Bras. Geosci. 12(1–3), 223–233 (1982).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    S. M. Naqvi, B. Uday Raj, and D. V. Subba Rao, et al., “Geology and Geochemistry of Arenite Quartzwacke from the Late Archaean Sandur Schist Belt: Implications for Provenance and Accretion Processes,” Precambr. Res. 114, 177–197 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. M. Naqvi, Divakara Rao, and Narain Hari, “The Primitive Crust: Evidence from the Indian Shield,” Precambr. Res. 6, 323–345 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    C. S. Pichamuthu, “Precambrian Geochronology of Peninsular India,” J. Geol. Soc. India 12, 262–273 (1972).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    C. S. Pichamuthu and R. Srinivasan, “A Billion Year History of the Dharwar Craton (3200 to 2100 M.Y. Ago),” Geol. Soc. India Mem. 4, 121–142 (1983).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    C. S. Pichamuthu and R. Srinivasan, “The Dharwar Craton,” in A Golden Jubilee Publication (Ind. Nat. Sci. Acad, New Delhi, 1984).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Precambrian of South India, Ed. by S. M. Naqvi and Rogers (Mem. Geol. Soc. India, Bangalore, 1983), Vol. 4.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    B. P. Radhakrishna, “Mineralization Episodes in the Dharwar Craton of Peninsular India,” J. Geol. Soc. India 17, 79–88 (1976).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    B. P. Radhakrishna, “Archaean Granite-Greenstone Terrain of the South India Shield,” Geol. Soc. India Mem. 4, 1–46 (1983).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    B. P. Radhakrishna, “Crustal Evolution and Metallogeny, Evidence from the Indian Shield: A Review,” J. Geol. Soc. India 25(10), 617–640 (1984).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    B. P. Radhakrishna and S. M. Naqvi, “Precambrian Continental Crust of India and Its Evolution,” J. Geol. 94, 145–166 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    D. K. Ray, “Mineralization in the Precambrian of India, Current Development and Potential,” in The Development Potential of Precambrian Mineral Deposits (Pergamon Press, New York, 1982), pp. 239–269.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rifted Basins and Aulacogens: Related Sedimentation, Crustal Evolution and Mineralization (Proceedings of Indo-Soviet Symposium on Deep Geology, Jan. 22–30, 1990, Aligarh Muslim Univ).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    A. N. Sarkar, “Precambrian Tectonic Evolution of Eastern India: A Model of Converging Microplates,” Tectonophysics 86, 363–397 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    S. C. Sarkar, “Evolution of Ore-Forming Processes Through Geologic Time: The Indian Scenario,” in Proceedings of XXVIII IGC (Washington, 1988a), Vol. 3, p. 21.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    S. C. Sarkar, “Plate Tectonics and Precambriam Metallogeny: The Concept and the Constraint,” in Proceedings of XXVIII IGC (Washington, 1988b), Vol. 3, p. 22.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    S. N. Sarkar, A. A. Polkanov, E. K. Gerling, and F. V. Chukrov, “Geochronology of the Precambrian of Peninsular India, a Synopsis,” Sci. Culture 30, 527–537 (1964).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    R. Srinivasan, “Present Status of the Sargur Group of the Archaean Dharwar Craton, South India,” Indian J. Geol 60, 57–72 (1988).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    R. Srinivasan and S. M. Naqvi, “Some Distinctive Trends in the Evolution of the Early Precambrian (Archaean) Dharwar Craton, South India,” in Precambrian Continental Crust and Its Economic Resources (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990), pp. 245–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    R. Srinivasan and R. W. Ojakangas, “Sedimentology of the Quartz Pebble Conglomerates and Quartzites of the Archaean Bababudan Group, Dharwar Craton, South India: Evidence for Early Precambrian Crustal Stability,” J. Geol. 94, 199–214 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    R. Srinivasan, K. Naha, K. Gopalan, et al., “The Nature of the Basement in the Archaean Dharwar Craton of Southern India and the Age of Peninsular Gneiss,” Indian Acad. Sci., Earth Planet. Sci. 102(4), 547–565 (1993).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    R. Srinivasan, K. Naha, Y. J. Bhaskar Rao, et al., “Archaean Greenstone Belts of the Eastern Baltic and the Southern Indian Shields: A Comparative Study,” Curr. Sci. 62(11), 741–744 (1992).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    C. Subrahmaniam, “On the Relation of Gravity Anomalies to Geotectonics of the Precambrian Terrains of the South Indian Shield,” J. Geol. Soc. India 19(6), 251–263 (1978).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    P. N. Taylor, B. Chadwick, C. R. L. Friend, et al., “New Age Data on the Geological Evolution of Southern India,” J. Geol. Soc. India 31, 155–157 (1988).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    “Tectonics and Metallogeny of SE Asia and Far East,” in Proceedings of International Symposium (Geol. Surv. India, Calcutta, 1974), pp. 38–39.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    A. B. Vrevsky, S. I. Rybakov, M. M. Efimov, P. Srinivasan, B. Rao, and K. Naha, “Greenstone Belts of the Baltic and South Indian Shields: Comparative Study of the Geological Structure and Evolution,” Geotektonika 30(5), 43–54 (1996) [Geotectonics 30 (5), 379–389 (1996)].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. I. Turchenko
    • 1
  • A. B. Vrevsky
    • 1
  • V. B. Dagelaisky
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Precambrian Geology and GeochronologyRussian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations