Advertisement

Geology of Ore Deposits

, 50:599 | Cite as

Mineralogy of the Precambrian southern Kostomuksha gold prospect in Karelia

  • L. V. Kuleshevich
  • V. Ya. Gor’kovets
Minerals and Parageneses of Minerals
  • 63 Downloads

Abstract

The southern Kostomuksha gold-sulfide prospect with a grade of 0.2–30 g/t Au belongs to the gold-pyrrhotite-arsenopyrite mineral type and is localized in the metasomatically altered shear zone at the southern flank of the Kostomuksha iron deposit. The Au-bearing pyrite ore is commonly characterized by a low grade (0.02–1.0 g/t Au). The grade of Au-bearing mineralization composed of arsenopyrite, loellingite, and electrum (4.28–15.31 wt % Ag and up to 0.99–2.16 wt % Hg) is higher; pyrrhotite, chalcopyrite, galena, maldonite, aurostibite, and native bismuth are additional components of this mineral assemblage. The ore mineralization is hosted in the near-latitudinal shear zone close to the contact between the folded and metamorphosed banded iron formation (BIF) and hälleflinta. The early stage of collision-related HP-HT metamorphism resulted in the formation of a garnet-amphibole-biotite assemblage (T = 680-750°C) and microcline. After an abrupt drop m pressure, metasomatic alteration and ore mineralization took place. The ore-forming process started at 510–440°C with deposition of arsenopyrite. Galena and electrum were formed at a lower temperature. The temperature continued to decline down to the stage of ore oxidation and deposition of colloform marcasite. Ore minerals precipitated from acid chloride aqueous solutions admixed with methane at the initial stage and from diluted aqueous solutions at the final stage. The character of wall-rock alteration and the gain of K, Rb, and B show that the ore-forming process postdated the emplacement of potassium granite. The occurrence of Cu, Zn, Pb, As, and Ni and other heterogeneous elements indicates a complex metamorphic-metasomatic source and an additional supply of Au, As, Bi, Sb, and Te under conditions of sulfur deficiency. The gold mineralization at the southern Kostomuksha prospect is classified as gold-sulfide (arsenopyrite) ore type related to shear zones in the BIF.

Keywords

Shear Zone Chalcopyrite Galena Tourmaline Arsenopyrite 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    N. S. Bortnikov, “On the Reliability of Arsenopyrite and Arcenopyrite-Sphalerite Geothermometers,” Geol. Rudn. Mestorozhd. 35(2), 177–191 (1993).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. M. Chernov, Stratigraphy and Sedimetation Conditions of Volcanogenic (Leptite) Banded Iron Formations of Karelia (Leningrad, 1964).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. M. Chernov, K. A. Inina, V. Ya. Gor’kovets, and M. B. Raevskaya, Volcanogenic Banded Iron Formations of Karelia (Karelia, Petrozavodsk, 1970).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. Ya. Gor’kovets and M. B. Raevskaya, “Geology and Ore Resource Potential of Rock Associations in the Kostomuksha Ore District,” in Large and Superlarge Deposits: Spatial Distribution and Formation Conditions (Moscow, 2004), pp. 95–109 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. Ya. Gor’kovets, M. B. Raevskaya, E. F. Belorusov, and K. A. Inina, Geology and Metallogeny of the Kostomuksha Iron Deposit (Kareliya, Petrozavodsk, 1981) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. Ya. Gor’kovets, M. B. Raevskaya, O. I. Volodichev, and L. S. Golovanova, Geology and Metamorphism of Banded Iron Formations in Karelia (Nauka, Leningrad, 1991) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. N. Kozhevnikov, Archean Greenstone Belts of the Karelian Craton as Accretionary Orogens (Petrozavodsk, 2000) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. V. Kuleshevich, “Evolution of Endogenetic Regimes and Stages of Gold Ore Formation in the Kostomuksha Greenstone Belt, Karelia,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 396(6), 808–812 (2004) [Dokl. Earth Sci. 397 (5), 672–676 (2004)].Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. V. Kuleshevich, O. V. Vasyukova, and V. N. Furman, “Mineralogy and Formation Conditions of Gold Occurrences in the Kostomuksha Greenstone Belt from Gas-Fluid Inclusions,” Zap. Ross. Mineral. O-va 134(5), 19–32 (2005).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. P. Nikitina, K. I. Lokhov, L. K. Levsky, et al., “Proterozoic Lamproite Magmatism in Eastern Baltic Shield,” Vest. St. Petersburg Gos. Univ., Ser. 7 2(14), 11–24 (1999).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. V. Petrov and T. A. Golovina, “Types of Gold Mineralization in Ores and Host Rocks of the Kostamuksha Iron Deposit,” in Proceedings of the Jubilee Scientific Session Dedicated to 100th Anniversary of N.G. Sudovikov: Metamorphism, Granite and Ore Formation (St. Petersburg, 2003), pp. 98–100.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. Yu. Prokof’ev, L. V. Kuleshevich, A. V. Volkov, and A. A. Sidorov, “The First Data on Formation Conditions and Composition of Ore-Forming Fluids in Gold Occurrences of the Kostomuksha Iron Deposit, Karelia,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 402(2), 233–238 (2005) [Dokl. Earth. Sci. 402 (4), 582–586 (2005)].Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mineral Resources of Republic Karelia, 2005 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. Saager, T. Oberthur, and H. P. Tomschi, “Geochemistry and Mineralogy of Banded Iron Formation Hosted Gold Mineralization in the Gwanda Greenstone Belt, Zimbabve,” Econ. Geol. 82(8), 2017–2032 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. D. Scott, “Application of Sphalerite and Arsenopyrite for Estimation of Temperatures and Sulfur Activities in Hydrothermal Deposits,” in Physicochemical Models of Petrogenesis and Ore Formation (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1984), pp. 41–49 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    F. I. Zhukov, L. T. Savchenko, F. I. Berezovsky, et al., “Formation Conditions of BIF at the Kostomuksha Deposit (Western Karelia) from Isotopic Dating,” Geol. Zh., No. 3, 26–32 (1983).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Geology, Karelian Scientific CenterRussian Academy of SciencesPetrozavodskRussia

Personalised recommendations