Studies on Russian Economic Development

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 423–430 | Cite as

Assessing sustainability of development of ecological and economic systems: A dynamic method

Economy and Ecology

Abstract

This paper considers the methodological approaches to measuring the sustainability of development of socioecological and economic systems. It presents the results from assessing the sustainability of development of the Russian Federation in 2005–2011 using the suggested system of dynamic indicators, in which different private dynamic characteristics of the economic, ecological, and social development components are in a certain subordinate order.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Our Common Future. A Report of the World Environment and Development Commission. http://www.un.org/ru/ga/pdf/brundtland.pdf
  2. 2.
    D. Forester, World Dynamics (OOO Izd. AST, Moscow; Terra Fantastica, St. Petersburg, 2003).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. N. Bobylev, Sustainable Development Indicators: Regional Measurement (Akropol’ TSPER, Moscow, 2007) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. P. Tarasova and E. B. Kruchina, Sustainable Development Indices and Indicators. http://www.mnr.gov.ru/files/part/8048_indikator.doc
  5. 5.
    Sustainable Development Indicators: Structure and Methodology (IPOS SO RAN, Tyumen, 2000).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    United Nations Millennium Declaration: Resolution of the U.N. General Assembly as of September 8 2000, no. 55/2. http://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl-conv/declarations/summitdecl.shtml
  7. 7.
    World Bank. Indicators. http://data.world-bank.org/indicator
  8. 8.
    European Commission > Eurostat > Sustainable Development Indicators > Indicators. http://epp.euro-stat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/sdi/indicators
  9. 9.
    T. V. Uskova, Theory and Methodology of Management of Sustainable Socioeconomic Development in a Region. Extended Abstract of Doctoral Dissertation in Economics (Vologda, 2010).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. V. Boiko, Basic Approaches to Marking out Sustainable Development Indicators: the World and Domestic Experience. http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/portal/natural/Nzvdpu_geogr/2008_15/osnovnue%20podxodu.pdf
  11. 11.
    E. V. Gorshenina and N. A. Khomyachenkova, “Monitoring Sustainable Development of an Industrial Enterprise,” Ros. Predprin, No. 1 (2), 2011.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    N. N. Kiseleva, Sustainable Development of a Regional Socioeconomic System: Methodology of Study, Models, and Management. Extended Abstract of Doctoral Dissertation in Economics (Rostov-on-Don, 2008).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. Matsakova, Customized Sustainability Indicators - A Tool for Assessing City Development. ETP Slovakia. http://spb.org.ru/ndc/work2-4.doc
  14. 14.
    O. V. Sivograkov, Sustainable Development Indicators for a Local Community (How to Assess the Results of a Local Agenda-21) (Propilei, Minsk, 2008) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    T. V. Alferova and E. A. Tretyakova, “Conceptual Modeling of the Definition of the “Sustainable Development” Category,” Zh. Ekon. Teor., No. 4 (2012) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    I. M. Syroezhin, Improvement of the System of Effectiveness and Quality Indicators (Ekonomika, Moscow, 1980) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Measurements in the Processes of Modeling Socioeconomic Systems (LFEI, Leningrad, 1991), Part 1, [in Russian].Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. S. Tonkikh, Modeling the Efficient Management of Corporate Finances (Institut ekonomiki UrO RAN, Yekaterinburg-Izhevsk, 2006) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Corporate Authors. Regional Economy. Natural Resource and Ecological Bases, Ed. by V. G. Glushkova and Yu. A. Simagina (KNORUS, Moscow, 2013) [in Russian].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Perm National Research Polytechnic UniversityPermRussia

Personalised recommendations