Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth

, Volume 54, Issue 2, pp 269–283 | Cite as

Variations in the Parameters of Background Seismic Noise during the Preparation Stages of Strong Earthquakes in the Kamchatka Region

  • V. A. Kasimova
  • G. N. Kopylova
  • A. A. Lyubushin
Article
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

The results of the long (2011–2016) investigation of background seismic noise (BSN) in Kamchatka by the method suggested by Doct. Sci. (Phys.-Math.) A.A. Lyubushin with the use of the data from the network of broadband seismic stations of the Geophysical Survey of the Russian Academy of Sciences are presented. For characterizing the BSN field and its variability, continuous time series of the statistical parameters of the multifractal singularity spectra and wavelet expansion calculated from the records at each station are used. These parameters include the generalized Hurst exponent α*, singularity spectrum support width Δα, wavelet spectral exponent β, minimal normalized entropy of wavelet coefficients En, and spectral measure of their coherent behavior. The peculiarities in the spatiotemporal distribution of the BSN parameters as a probable response to the earthquakes with Мw = 6.8–8.3 that occurred in Kamchatka in 2013 and 2016 are considered. It is established that these seismic events were preceded by regular variations in the BSN parameters, which lasted for a few months and consisted in the reduction of the median and mean α*, Δα, and β values estimated over all the stations and in the increase of the En values. Based on the increase in the spectral measure of the coherent behavior of the four-variate time series of the median and mean values of the considered statistics, the effect of the enhancement of the synchronism in the joint (collective) behavior of these parameters during a certain period prior to the mantle earthquake in the Sea of Okhotsk (May 24, 2013, Mw = 8.3) is diagnosed. The procedures for revealing the precursory effects in the variations of the BSN parameters are described and the examples of these effects are presented.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berger, J., Davis, P., and Ekstrom, G., Ambient earth noise: a survey of the global seismographic network, J. Geophys. Res., 2004, vol. 109, p. 11307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chebrov, V.N., Droznin, D.V., Kugaenko, Yu.A., Levina, V.I., Senyukov, S.L., Sergeev, V.A., Shevchenko, Yu.V., and Yashchuk, V.V., The system of detailed seismological observations in Kamchatka in 2011, J. Volcanol. Seismol., 2013, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 16–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Feder, J., Fractals, New York: Plenum Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ivanov, V.Yu. and Kasimova, V.A., Creation of the layout of GIS–Project “Petropavlovsk Geodynamical Polygon” for an information supply with system for complex geophysical observations, Vestn. KRAUNTs, Nauki Zemle, 2009, no. 13, pp. 208–213.Google Scholar
  5. Kasahara, K., Earthquake Mechanics, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  6. Kasimova, V.A., Spatiotemporal variations of the ambient seismic noise in Kamchatka in 2011–2015, in Sovremennaya tektonofizika. Metody i rezul’taty. Materialy chetvertoi molodezhnoi tektonofizicheskoi shkoly-seminara (Modern Tectonophysics: Methods and Results. Proc. 4th Tectonophysical Workshop for Young Scientists), vol. 1, Moscow: IFZ, 2015, pp. 144–153.Google Scholar
  7. Kasimova, V.A. and Kopylova, G.N., Spectral structure of low-frequency seismic noise at broadband stations in Kamchatka, Problemy kompleksnogo geofizicheskogo monitoringa Dal’nego Vostoka Rossii. Tr. Chetvertoi nauchno-tekhn. konf. (Problems of Integrated Geophysical Monitoring of the Russian Far East. Proc. 4th Scientific and Technical Conference), Obninsk: GS RAN, 2013, pp. 64–68.Google Scholar
  8. Lyubushin, A.A., Analiz dannykh sistem geofizicheskogo i ekologicheskogo monitoringa (Analysis of the Data of Geophysical and Ecological Monitoring), Moscow: Nauka, 2007.Google Scholar
  9. Lyubushin, A.A., Microseismic noise in the low frequency range (periods of 1–300 min): Properties and possible prognostic features, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2008, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lyubushin, A.A., Synchronization trends and rhythms of multifractal parameters of the field of low-frequency microseisms, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2009, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 381–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lyubushin, A.A., Multifractal parameters of low-frequency microseisms, in Synchronization and Triggering: from Fracture to Earthquake Process, GeoPlanet: Earth and Planetary Sciences Ser., Berlin: Springer, 2010a, chapter 15, pp. 253–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lyubushin, A.A., The statistics of the time segments of lowfrequency microseisms: trends and synchronization, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2010b, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 544–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lyubushin, A.A., Cluster analysis of low-frequency microseismic noise, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2011a, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 488–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lyubushin, A.A., Seismic catastrophe in Japan on March 11, 2011: Long-term forecast based on low-frequency microseisms, Geofiz. Protsessy Biosfera, 2011b, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 9–35.Google Scholar
  15. Lyubushin, A.A., Forecast of the Great Japan earthquake, Priroda (Moscow, Russ. Fed.), 2012a, no. 8, pp. 23–33.Google Scholar
  16. Lyubushin, A., Prognostic properties of low-frequency seismic noise, Nat. Sci., 2012b, vol. 4, no. 8A, pp. 659–666.Google Scholar
  17. Lyubushin, A., How soon would the next mega-earthquake occur in Japan, Nat. Sci, 2013a, vol. 5, no. 8, A1, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
  18. Lyubushin, A.A., Mapping the properties of low-frequency microseisms for seismic hazard assessment, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2013b, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lyubushin, A.A., Maps of linear synchronization for the properties of global low-frequency seismic noise, Geofiz. Issled., 2013c, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 41–53.Google Scholar
  20. Lyubushin, A.A., Analysis of coherence in global seismic noise for 1997–2012, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2014a, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 325–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lyubushin, A.A., Dynamic estimate of seismic danger based on multifractal properties of low-frequency seismic noise, Nat. Hazards, 2014b, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 471–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lyubushin, A.A. and Sobolev, G.A., Multifractal measures of synchronization of microseismic oscillations in a minute range of periods, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2006, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 734–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lyubushin, A. and Yakovlev, P., Properties of GPS noise at Japan islands before and after Tohoku mega-earthquake, SpringerPlus, 2014, vol. 3, p. 364. doi https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lyubushin, A.A., Kopylova, G.N., Kasimova, V.A., and Taranova, L.N., Multifractal characteristics of seismic noise in Kamchatka, 2011–2013, Problemy kompleksnogo geofizicheskogo monitoringa Dal’nego Vostoka Rossii. Tr. Chetvertoi nauchno-tekhn. konf. (Problems of Integrated Geophysical Monitoring of the Russian Far East. Proc. 4th Scientific and Technocal Conference), Obninsk: GS RAN, 2013, pp. 382–386.Google Scholar
  25. Lyubushin, A.A., Kopylova, G.N., Kasimova, V.A., and Taranova, L.N., The properties of fields of low frequency noise from the network of broadband seismic stations in Kamchatka, Vestn. KRAUNTs, Nauki Zemle, 2015, no. 26, pp. 20–36.Google Scholar
  26. Mallat, S., A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing, San Diego: Academic Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  27. Sobolev, G.A. and Lyubushin, A.A., Microseismic impulses as earthquake precursors, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2006, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 721–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sobolev, G.A. and Lyubushin, A.A., Microseismic anomalies before the Sumatra earthquake of December 26, 2004, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2007, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 341–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sobolev, G.A., Lyubushin, A.A., and Zakrzhevskaya, N.A., Synchronization of microseismic variations within a minute range of periods, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2005, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 599–691.Google Scholar
  30. Sobolev, G.A., Lyubushin, A.A., Zakrzhevskaya N.A., Asymmetrical pulses, the periodicity and synchronization of low frequency microseisms, J. Volcanol. Seismol., 2008, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 118–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stehly, L., Campillo, M., and Shapiro, N.M., A study of the seismic noise from its long-range correlation properties, J. Geophys. Res., 2006, vol. 111, no. B10306. doi 10.1029/2005jb004237Google Scholar
  32. Tanimoto, T., The oceanic excitation hypothesis for the continuous oscillations of the Earth, Geophys. J. Int., 2005, vol. 160, pp. 276–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tanimoto, T., Um, J., Nishida, K., and Kobayashi, N., Earth’s continuous oscillations observed on seismically quiet days, Geophys. Rev. Lett., 1998, vol. 25, pp. 1553–1556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. A. Kasimova
    • 1
  • G. N. Kopylova
    • 1
  • A. A. Lyubushin
    • 2
  1. 1.Kamchatka Branch, Geophysical SurveyRussian Academy of SciencesPetropavlovsk-KamchatskiiRussia
  2. 2.Schmidt Institute of Physics of the EarthRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations