Advertisement

Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth

, Volume 50, Issue 5, pp 632–640 | Cite as

The velocity structure of the Carpathian zone from the ambient noise surface wave tomography

  • T. B. Yanovskaya
  • E. L. Lyskova
  • T. Yu. Koroleva
Article

Abstract

The dispersion curves of the Rayleigh wave group velocities are constructed along 60 interstation seismic paths in Central Europe based on the cross-correlation function of seismic noise. Together with the previous data (Yanovskaya and Lyskova, 2013), this information was used for reconstructing the three-dimensional distribution of S-wave velocities in the upper mantle of the Carpathian region. In the present work, the previous results are refined by expanding the data set by the additional seismic paths that intersect the Carpathian region and by modifying the procedure for constructing the locally averaged dispersion curves so as to obtain a more compact resolution. The results of the study suggest the complex, multidirectional character of the plate motion in the region.

Keywords

Dispersion Curve Solid Earth Seismic Noise Pannonian Basin Velocity Section 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balla, Z., Tertiary palaeomagnetic data for the CarpathoPannonian region in the light of Miocene rotation kinematics, Tectonophysics, 1987, vol. 139, nos. 1–2, pp. 67–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Csontos, L., Nagymarosy, A., Horvath, F., and Kovac, M., Tertiary evolution of the intra-Carpathian area: a model, Tectonophysics, 1992, vol. 208, nos. 1–3, pp. 221–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ditmar, P.G. and Yanovskaya, T.B., Generalization of the Backus-Hilbert method for estimating horizontal variations in the surface wave velocity, Fiz. Zemli, 1987, no. 6, pp. 30–40.Google Scholar
  4. Geothermal Atlas of Europe, Hurtig, E., et al., Eds., Gotha: Hermann Hack Verlagsgesellschaft: Geographisch-Kartographische Anstalt, 1992.Google Scholar
  5. Girbacea, R. and Frisch, W., Slab in the wrong place: lower lithospheric mantle delamination in the last stage of the Eastern Carpathian subduction retreat, Geology, 1998, vol. 26, pp. 611–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Knapp, J.H., Knapp, C.C., Raileanu, V., Matenco, L., Mocanu, V., and Dinu, C., Crustal constraints on the origin of mantle seismicity in the Vrancea zone, Romania: the case of active continental lithospheric delamination, Tectonophysics, 2005, vol. 410, pp. 311–323.Google Scholar
  7. Koroleva, T.Yu., Yanovskaya, T.B., and Patrusheva, S.S., Implication of seismic noise for determining the structure of the upper Earth rock mass, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2009, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 369–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Koroleva, T.Yu., Yanovskaya, T.B., and Patrusheva, S.S., Velocity structure of the upper mantle of the East European Platform according to seismic noise data, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2010, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 839–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lyskova, E.L. and Yanovskaya, T.B., Velocity structure of the upper mantle in the Vrancea zone according to the ambient noise surface wave tomography, Vopr. Geofiz., 2013, no. 46, pp. 3–11.Google Scholar
  10. Mason, P.R.D., Seghedi, I., Szakacs, A., and Downes, H., Magmatic constraints on geodynamic models of subduction in the East Carpathians, Romania, Tectonophysics, 1998, vol. 297, pp. 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Russo, R.M., Mocanu, V., Radulian, M., Popa, M., and Bonjer, K.-P., Seismic attenuation in the Carpathian bend zone and surroundings, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 2005, vol. 237, pp. 695–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sandulescu, M., Cenozoic tectonic history of the Carpathians, in The Pannonian Basin: A Study in Basin Evolution, Royden, L.H. and Horvath, F., Eds., Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geophys. Memoir, 1988, vol. 45, pp. 17–25.Google Scholar
  13. Sieminski, A., Leveque, J.-J., and Debayle, E., Can finitefrequency effects be accounted for in ray theory surface wave tomography?, Geophys. Rev. Lett., 2004, vol. 31, L24614. doi: 10.1029/2004GL021402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Yanovskaya, T.B. and Manucharova, T.Yu., The allowance for the ray width in the surface wave group velocity tomography, Vopr. Geofiz., 2006, vol. 39, pp. 3–19.Google Scholar
  15. Yanovskaya, T.B. and Koroleva, T.Yu., Effect of earthquakes on ambient noise cross-correlation function, Izv. Phys. Solid Earth, 2011, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 747–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Yanovskaya, T.B. and Lyskova, E.L., The velocity structure of the upper mantle of Europe from the ambient noise surface wave tomography, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2013, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 601–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Yanovskaya, T.B., Koroleva, T.Yu., and Lyskova, E.L., The structure of the upper mantle in the vicinity of the Tornquist-Teisseyre zone from ambient noise tomography, Vopr. Geofiz., 2013, vol. 45, pp. 3–16.Google Scholar
  18. Yoshizawa, K. and Kennett, B.L.N., Determination of the influence zone for surface wave paths, Geophys. J. Int., 2002, vol. 149, pp. 440–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. B. Yanovskaya
    • 1
  • E. L. Lyskova
    • 1
  • T. Yu. Koroleva
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of PhysicsSt. Petersburg State UniversityPetrodvorets, St. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations