Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth

, Volume 50, Issue 3, pp 325–333 | Cite as

Analysis of coherence in global seismic noise for 1997–2012

  • A. A. Lyubushin


The coherent behavior of four parameters characterizing the global field of low-frequency (periods from 2 to 500 min) seismic noise is studied. These parameters include logarithmic variance, kurtosis (coefficient of excess), width of support of multifractal singularity spectrum, and minimal normalized entropy of the distribution of the squared orthogonal wavelet coefficients. The analy)sis is based on the data from 229 broadband stations of GSN, GEOSCOPE, and GEOFON networks for a 16-year period from the beginning of 1997 to the end of 2012. The entire set of stations is subdivided into eight groups, which, taken together, provide full coverage of the Earth. The daily median values of the studied noise parameters are calculated in each group. This procedure yields four 8-dimensional time series with a time step of 1 day with a length of 5844 samples in each scalar component. For each of the four 8-dimensional time series, the frequency-time diagram of the evolution of the spectral measure of coherence (based on canonical coherences) is constructed in the moving time window with a length of 365 days. Besides, for each parameter, the maximum-frequency values of the coherence measure and their mean over the four analyzed noise parameters are calculated as a measure of synchronization that depends on time only. Based on the conducted analysis, it is concluded that the increase in the intensity of the strongest (M ≥ 8.5) earthquakes after the mega-earthquake on Sumatra on December 26, 2004 was preceded by the enhancement of synchronization between the parameters of global seismic noise over the entire time interval of observations since the beginning of 1997. This synchronization continues growing up to the end of the studied period (2012), which can be interpreted as a probable precursor of the further increase in the intensity of the strongest earthquakes all over the world.


Strong Earthquake Solid Earth Seismic Noise Coherence Measure Singularity Spectrum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Berger, J., Davis, P., Ekstrom, G., Ambient Earth noise: A survey of the global seismographic network, J. Geophys. Res., 2004, vol. 109, p. B11307.Google Scholar
  2. Feder, J., Fractals, New York: Plenum Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Huber, P.J., Robust Statistics, New York: Wiley, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kantelhardt, J.W., Zschiegner, S.A., Konscienly-Bunde, E., Havlin, S., Bunde, A., and Stanley, H.E., Multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis of nonstationary time series, Physica A, 2002, vol. 87, no. 114, pp. 87–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kobayashi, N. and Nishida, K., Continuous excitation of planetary free oscillations by atmospheric disturbances, Nature, 1998, vol. 395, pp. 357–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lyubushin, A.A., Analysis of canonical coherences in the problems of geophysical monitoring, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 1998, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 52–58.Google Scholar
  7. Lyubushin, A.A., Pisarenko, V.F., Bolgov, M.V., and Rukavishnikova, T.A., The study of general effects in the variations of the river flows, Meteorol. Gidrol., 2003, no. 7, pp. 76–88.Google Scholar
  8. Lyubushin, A.A., Pisarenko, V.F., Bolgov, M.V., Rodkin, M.V., and Rukavishnikova, T.A., Synchronous variations in the Caspian Sea level from coastal observations in 1977–1991, Izv., Atmos. Oceanic Phys., 2004, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 737–746.Google Scholar
  9. Lyubushin, A.A. and Sobolev, G.A., Multifractal measures of synchronization of microseismic oscillations in a minute range of periods, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2006, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 734–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lyubushin, A.A., Analiz dannykh sistem geofizicheskogo i ekologicheskogo monitoringa (Analysis of the Data of Geophysical and Ecological Monitoring), Moscow: Nauka, 2007.Google Scholar
  11. Lyubushin, A.A., Microseismic noise in the low frequency range (periods of 1–300 min): Properties and possible prognostic features, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2008, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 275–290.Google Scholar
  12. Lyubushin, A.A., Synchronization trends and rhythms of multifractal parameters of the field of low-frequency microseisms, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2009, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 381–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lyubushin, A.A., the statistics of the time segments of low-frequency microseisms: trends and synchronization, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2010, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 544–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lyubushin, A.A., Cluster analysis of low-frequency microseismic noise, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2011a, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 488–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lyubushin, A.A., Seismic catastrophe in Japan on March 11, 2011: Long-term forecast based on low-frequency microseisms, Geofiz. Protsessy Biosfera, 2011b, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 9–35.Google Scholar
  16. Lyubushin, A.A. and Klyashtorin, L.B., Short term global dT prediction using (60–70)-years periodicity, Energy Environ., 2012, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lyubushin, A.A., Forecast of the Great Japan earthquake, Priroda (Moscow, Russ. Fed.), 2012a, no. 8, pp. 23–33.Google Scholar
  18. Lyubushin, A., Prognostic properties of low-frequency seismic noise, Nat. Sci., 2012b, vol. 4, no. 8A, pp. 659–666. doi: 10.4236/ns.2012.428087. Google Scholar
  19. Lyubushin, A.A., Mapping the properties of low-frequency microseisms for seismic hazard assessment, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2013a, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lyubushin, A.A., Maps of linear synchronization for the properties of global low-frequency seismic noise, Geofiz. Issled., 2013b, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 41–53.Google Scholar
  21. Lyubushin, A.A., Spots of seismic danger extracted by properties of low-frequency seismic noise, European Geosciences Union General Assembly 2013, Vienna, 7–12 April, 2013, Geophys. Res. Abstracts, 2013c, Vol. 15, EGU2013-1614.
  22. Mallat, S., A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing, San Diego: Academic Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  23. Marple, S.L., Jr., Digital Spectral Analysis with Applications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1990.Google Scholar
  24. Rhie, J. and Romanowicz, B., Excitation of Earth’s continuous free oscillations by atmosphere-ocean-seafloor coupling, Nature, 2004, vol. 431, pp. 552–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sobolev, G.A., Microseismic variations prior to a strong earthquake, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2004, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 455–464.Google Scholar
  26. Sobolev, G.A. and Lyubushin, A.A., Microseismic anomalies before the Sumatra earthquake of December 26, 2004, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2007, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 341–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sobolev, G.A., Lyubushin, A.A., Jr., and Zakrzhevskaya, N.A., Synchronization of microseismic variations within a minute range of periods, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2005, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 599–621.Google Scholar
  28. Sobolev, G.A. and Lyubushin, A.A., Microseismic impulses as earthquake precursors, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2006, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 721–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sobolev, G.A., Series of asymmetric pulses in the low-frequency range (periods of 1-300 min) of microseisms as indicators of a metastable state in seismically active zones, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2008, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sobolev, G.A., A.A. Lyubushin, N.A. Zakrzhevskaya. Asymmetrical pulses, the periodicity and synchronization of low frequency microseisms, J. Volcanol. Seismol., 2008, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 118–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sobolev, G.A., Low frequency seismic noise before a magnitude 9.0 Tohoku earthquake on March 11, 2011, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2011a, vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 1034–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sobolev, G.A., Kontseptsiya predskazuemosti zemletryasenii na osnove dinamiki seismichnosti pri triggernom vozdeistvii (The Concept of Earthquake Predictability Based on the Dynamics of Triggered Seismicity), Moscow: IFZ RAN, 2011b.Google Scholar
  33. Tanimoto, T., The oceanic excitation hypothesis for the continuous oscillations of the Earth, Geophys. J. Int., 2005, vol. 160, pp. 276–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vadzinskii, R.N., Spravochnik po veroyatnostnym raspredeleniyam (Reference Book on Probability Distributions), St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2001.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Schmidt Institute of Physics of the EarthRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations