Advertisement

Russian Journal of Ecology

, Volume 44, Issue 5, pp 371–374 | Cite as

Technogenic pollution of soil and plant cover in southern Primorye

  • I. V. Molchanova
  • L. N. Mikhailovskaya
  • V. N. Pozolotina
  • Yu. N. Zhuravlev
  • Ya. O. Timofeeva
  • M. L. Burdukovskii
Article

Abstract

Evaluation of technogenic load on ecosystems of southern Primorye has shown that the soil contents of 90Sr and 137Cs vary within the ranges of 0.3–1.3 and 0.4–3.0 kBq/m2, respectively; i.e., they do not exceed the level of background radioactivity that is considered normal at latitudes between 50° and 60° N. The presence of 134Cs in the samples indicates a contribution from radionuclides discharged by the Fukushima nuclear accident. According to calculations, the additional 137Cs input into the soils of the study area varies between 0.03 and 0.30 kBq/m2. Soil analysis for heavy metals and trace elements has revealed an approximately twofold excess over safety norms (MACs) in the concentrations of technogenic Cu and Pb. For other elements, the excess is within the range of 8–32%.

Keywords

monitoring radionuclides the Fukushima accident heavy metals Primorye 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atlas geoekologicheskikh kart na territorii zony nablyudeniya FGUP PO “Mayak” (Geoecological Maps of the Control Area around the Mayak Federal Production Association: An Atlas), Moscow-Ozersk: ZAO Geospetsekologiya, 2007.Google Scholar
  2. Bolsunovsky, A. and Dementyev, D., Evidence of the radioactive fallout in the center of Asia (Russia) following the Fukushima accident, J. Environ. Radioact., 2011, vol. 102, no. 11, pp. 1062–1064. doi 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2011.06.007PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chertko, N.K. and Chertko, E.N., Geokhimiya i ekologiya khimicheskikh elementov: Spravochnoe posobie (Geochemistry and Ecology of Chemical Elements: A Reference Book), Minsk: Belarus. Gos. Univ., 2008.Google Scholar
  4. GOST (State Standard) 17.4.1.02-83, 1990.Google Scholar
  5. Ivanov, G.I., Pochvoobrazovanie na yuge Dal’nego Vostoka (Soil Formation in the Southern Far East), Moscow: Nauka, 1976.Google Scholar
  6. Kirchner, G., Bossew, P., and De Cort, M., Radioactivity from Fukushima Daiichi in air over Europe: 2. What can it tell us about the accident?, J. Environ. Radioact., 2012, vol. 114, pp. 35–40. doi 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2011.12.016PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kovalevskii, A.L. and Kovalevskaya, O.M., Biogeokhimiya uranovykh mestorozhdenii i metodicheskie osnovy ikh poiskov (Biogeochemistry of Uranium Deposits and Methodological Foundations of Prospecting for Them), Novosibirsk: Geo, 2010.Google Scholar
  8. Masson, O., Baeza, A., Bieringer, J., et al., Tracking of airborne radionuclides from the damaged Fukushima Daiichi nuclear reactors by European networks, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2011, vol. 45, no. 18, pp. 7670–7677. doi 10.1021/es2017158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Molchanova, I.V., Mikhailovskaya, L.N., Pozolotina, V.N., et al., Cesium isotopes from Fukushima-1 nuclear accident in components of terrestrial ecosystems in the Urals, Semipalatinskii Ispytatel’nyi poligon. Radiatsionnoe nasledie i perspektivy razvitiya: Tez. dokl. V mezhdun. nauchno-praktich. konf. (The Semipalatinsk Nuclear Weapons Test Range: Radioactive Heritage and Prospects for Development, Abstr. V Int. Sci.-Pract. Conf.), Kurchatov, 2012, pp. 89–90.Google Scholar
  10. Onishchenko, G.G., Romanovich, I.K., Barkovskii, A.N., et al., First results of emergency response to the Fukushima-1 nuclear accident: 2. Measures taken by Rospotrebnadzor at early stages of the accident to protect from radiation the population of the Russian Federation, Radiats. Gigiena, 2011, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 13–22.Google Scholar
  11. Seledets, V.P., Ekologicheskaya otsenka territorii Dal’nego Vostoka Rossii po rastitel’nomu pokrovu (Ecological Assessment of the Far East Territory Based on the State of Vegetation), Vladivostok: Dal’nauka, 2011.Google Scholar
  12. Semal’, V.A., Properties of soils in southern Sikhote-Alin using the example of the Ussuri Reserve, Euras. Soil Sci., 2010, no. 3, pp. 278–286.Google Scholar
  13. Statement on Recent Finding in West Coast States and Hawaii, EPA: March 22, 2011. http://www.epa.gov/japan2011/
  14. Timofeeva, Ya.O. and Golov, V.I., Sorption of heavy metals by iron-manganic nodules in soils of Primorskii region, Euras. Soil Sci., 2007, no. 12, pp. 1308–1315.Google Scholar
  15. Yoshida, N. and Kanda, J., Tracking the Fukushima radionuclides, Science, 2012, vol. 336, pp. 1115–1116. doi 10.1126/science.1219493PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. V. Molchanova
    • 1
  • L. N. Mikhailovskaya
    • 1
  • V. N. Pozolotina
    • 1
  • Yu. N. Zhuravlev
    • 2
  • Ya. O. Timofeeva
    • 2
  • M. L. Burdukovskii
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural BranchRussian Academy of SciencesYekaterinburgRussia
  2. 2.Institute of Biology and Soil Science, Far East BranchRussian Academy of SciencesVladivostokRussia

Personalised recommendations