Russian Journal of Ecology

, Volume 41, Issue 5, pp 365–371 | Cite as

Evolutionary-ecological analysis of trends in phenogenetic variation of homologous morphological structures: From populations to ecological series of species

  • A. G. Vasilyev
  • I. A. Vasilyeva
  • V. N. Bol’shakov


An evolutionary-ecological analysis of homologous variations in cranial morphological structures (phenes) has been performed at the level of populations and subspecies exposed to technogenic, climatic, and landscape-geographic changes in the environment, as well as with ecological series of 46 species and infraspecific forms differing in ecological specialization within the family Cricetidae. On this basis, consistent manifestations of phenogenetic variation have been revealed. Species with the same ecological specialization show parallel directional changes in the frequencies of homologous phenes and their individual combinations. These changes apparently have adaptive significance and result from rearrangements in the ancestral epigenetic system. It is shown that similar ecological requirements imposed by the environment historically lead to unidirectional transformations of homologous morphological structures in different species, which may account for high incidence of homoplasy as well as for the parallel and, in part, directional evolution of closely related taxa with similar ecological specialization.

Key words

evolutionary ecology phenogenetic variation homologous morphological structures nonmetric characters rodents 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Astaurov, B.L., Nasledstvennost’ i razvitie (Heredity and Development), Moscow: Nauka, 1974.Google Scholar
  2. Berry, R.J. and Searle, A.G., Epigenetic Polymorphism of the Rodent Skeleton, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1963, vol. 140, pp. 557–615.Google Scholar
  3. Fadeeva, T.V. and Smirnov, N.G., Melkie mlekopitayushchie Permskogo Predural’ya v pozdnem pleistotsene i golotsene (Small Mammals of the Perm Cisural Region in the Late Pleistocene and Holocene), Yekaterinburg: Goshchitskii, 2008.Google Scholar
  4. Gilbert, S.F., Evo-Devo, Devo-Evo, and Devgen-Popgen, Biol. Philos., 2003, vol. 18, pp. 347–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gilbert, S.F., Opitz, J.M., and Raff, R.A., Resynthesizing Evolutionary and Developmental Biology, Dev. Biol., 1996, vol. 173, pp. 357–372.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hammer, Ø., Harper, D.A.T., and Ryan, P.D., PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis, Palaeontol. Electron., 2001, vol. 4, no. 1.Google Scholar
  7. Korona, V.V. and Vasilyev, A.G., Stroenie i izmenchivost’ list’ev rastenii: Osnovy modul’noi teorii (Structure and Variation of Plant Leaves: Fundamentals of the Modular Theory), Yekaterinburg: Yekaterinburg, 2000.Google Scholar
  8. Krenke, N.P., Phenogenetic Variation, Tr. Biol. Inst. im. K.A. Timiryazeva, Moscow, 1933–1935, vol. 1.Google Scholar
  9. Meyen, S.V., Problems in Phylogenetic Classification of Organisms, in Sovremennaya paleontologiya: metody, napravleniya, problemy, prakticheskoe prilozhenie: Spr. posob. (A Manual of Modern Paleontology: Methods, Directions, Problems, and Applications), Moscow: Nedra, 1988, vol. 2, pp. 497–511.Google Scholar
  10. Moyne, S. and Neige, P., The Space-Time Relationship of Taxonomic Diversity and Morphological Disparity in the Middle Jurassic Ammonite Radiation, Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol., 2007, vol. 248, pp. 82–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pianka, E.R., Evolutionary Ecology, New York: Harper and Row, 1978. Translated under the title Evolyutsionnaya ekologiya, Moscow: Mir, 1981.Google Scholar
  12. Rautian, A.S., Paleontology As a Source of Information on Patterns and Factors of Evolution, in Sovremennaya paleontologiya: metody, napravleniya, problemy, prakticheskoe prilozhenie: Spr. posob. (A Manual of Modern Paleontology: Methods, Directions, Problems, and Applications), Moscow: Nedra, 1988, vol. 2, pp. 76–118.Google Scholar
  13. Shvarts, S.S., Ekologicheskie zakonomernosti evolyutsii (Ecological Patterns of Evolution), Moscow: Nauka, 1980.Google Scholar
  14. Smirnov, N.G., Dynamics of Species and Species Complexes as a Field of Research in Historical Ecology, Ekologiya, 2006, no. 6, pp. 452–456.Google Scholar
  15. Strunnikov, V.A. and Vyshinskii, I.M., Realizational Variation in the Silkworm, in Problemy genetiki i teorii evolyutsii (Problems in Genetics and the Theory of Evolution), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1991, pp. 99–114.Google Scholar
  16. Tatarinov, L.P., Parallelisms and Directionality in Evolution, in Evolyutsiya i biotsenoticheskie krizisy (Evolution and Biocenotic Crises), Moscow: Nauka, 1987, pp. 124–144.Google Scholar
  17. Vasilyev, A.G., Epigeneticheskie osnovy fenetiki: na puti k populyatsionnoi meronomii (Epigenetic Foundations of Phenetics: On the Way to Population Meronomy), Yekaterinburg: Akademkniga, 2005.Google Scholar
  18. Vasilyev, A.G., Phenogenetic Variation and Population Meronomy, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 2009, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 195–209.Google Scholar
  19. Vasilyev, A.G. and Bol’shakov, V.N., Yesterday and PresentDay Views on Evolutionary Ecology, Ekologiya, 1994, no. 3, pp. 4–15.Google Scholar
  20. Vasilyev, A.G. and Vasilyeva, I.A., Non-Metric Variation in Red Vole Populations within the East-Ural Radioactive Track (EURT) Zone, Acta Theriol., 1995, Suppl. 3, pp. 55–64.Google Scholar
  21. Vasilyev, A.G. and Vasilyeva, I.A., Epigenetic Rearrangements in Populations As a Probable Mechanism Providing for the Onset of a Biocenotic Crisis, Vestn. Nizhegorod. Gos. Univ. im. N.V. Lobachevskogo, Ser. Biol., 2005, no. 1 (9), pp. 27–38.Google Scholar
  22. Vasilyeva, I.A., Patterns of Homologous Variation in Morphological Characters of Rodents at Different Stages of Evolutionary Divergence, Extended Abstract of Doctoral (Biol.) Dissertation, Yekaterinburg, 2006.Google Scholar
  23. Vasilyeva, I.A., Vasilyev, A.G., Lyubashevskii, N.M., et al., Phenogenetic Analysis of Pygmy Wood Mouse (Apodemus uralensis Pall.) Populations in the Zone of the Eastern Ural Radioactive Trace (EURT), Ekologiya, 2003, no. 6, pp. 325–332.Google Scholar
  24. Zakharov, V.M., Asimmetriya zhivotnykh: populyatsionnofeneticheskii podkhod (Asymmetry in Animals: A Population-Genetic Approach), Moscow: Nauka, 1987.Google Scholar
  25. Zherikhin, V.V., Izbrannye trudy po paleoekologii i filotsenogenetike (Selected Studies in Paleoecology and Phylocenogenetics), Moscow: KMK, 2003.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. G. Vasilyev
    • 1
  • I. A. Vasilyeva
    • 1
  • V. N. Bol’shakov
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural DivisionRussian Academy of SciencesYekaterinburgRussia

Personalised recommendations