Advertisement

Russian Journal of Ecology

, Volume 39, Issue 5, pp 359–365 | Cite as

Home range and the expression of nonresidence in bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus): Interpretation of the results of marking at live-trap lines

  • N. A. Shchipanov
  • M. G. Lyapina
Article

Abstract

The distribution of activity of bank voles along a live-trap line can be approximated by the normal law. The standard deviation is a stable characteristic of the sizes of regularly used space. Occurrence of an animal beyond a distance of three standard deviations from the center of activity is regarded as an expression of nonresidence. Different types of space use have been found: equilibrium and drifting home ranges, movements, and excursions. Formal criteria for distinguishing space use patterns are presented.

Key words

bank vole home range nonresidence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramsky, Z. and Tracy, C.R., Relation between Home Range and Regulation of Population Size in Microtus agrestis, Oikos, 1980, vol. 34, pp. 347–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aebischer, N.J., Robertson, P.A., and Kenward, R.E., Compositional Analysis of Habitat Use from Animal Radio-Tracking Data, Ecology, 1993, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 1313–1325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, J.D., The Home Range: A New Nonparametric Estimation Technique, Ecology, 1982, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrzejewski, R. and Mazurkiewicz, M., Abundance of Food Supply and Size of Bank Voles Home Range, Acta Theriol., 1976, vol. 21, pp. 237–256.Google Scholar
  5. Calhaun, J.B. and Casby, J.U., Calculation of Home Range and Density of Small Mammals, Publ. Health Monogr., 1958, vol. 55, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
  6. Chistova, T.Yu., Dynamics of Daily Home Range Size in Female Bank Voles during the Breeding Period, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Obshch. Biol., 1995, vol. 345, no. 5, pp. 716–718.Google Scholar
  7. Chistova, T.Yu., Specific Features of Interspecific Relationships in Bank Voles: Results of Observations in Nature, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Obshch. Biol., 2002, vol. 382, no. 5, pp. 714–717.Google Scholar
  8. Earling, S., Hoogenboom, J., and Agrell, J., et al. Density-Related Home-Range Size and Overlap in Adult Field Voles (Microtus agrestis) in Southern Sweden, J. Mammal., 1990, vol. 71, pp. 597–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Godfrey, G.K., A Technique for Finding Microtus Nests, J. Mammal., 1953, vol. 34, pp. 503–505.Google Scholar
  10. Karaseva, E.V. and Telitsyna, A.Yu., Metody izucheniya gryzunov v polevykh usloviyakh: Uchety chislennosti i mechenie (Methods of Field Studies on Rodents: Census and Marking), Moscow: Nauka, 1996.Google Scholar
  11. Kucheruk, V.V., Quantitative Census of Main Pest Rodents and Shrews, in Metody ucheta chislennosti i geograficheskogo raspredeleniya nazemnykh pozvonochnykh (Methods for Taking Census and Estimating Geographic Distribution of Terrestrial Vertebrates), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1952.Google Scholar
  12. Madison, D.M., Movement and Habitat Use among Interacting Peromyscus leocopus As Revealed by Radiotelemetry, Can. Field Nat., 1977, vol. 91, pp. 273–281.Google Scholar
  13. Mironov, A.D., Some Features of Intraspecific Territorial Relationships in the Bank Vole, Vestn. Leningr. Univ., 1973, vol. 15, pp. 150–153.Google Scholar
  14. Mironov, A.D., Specific Fetures of Area Use by Bank Voles, in Zhivotnye-komponenty ekosistem Severa (Animals As Ecosystem Components in the North), Syktyvkar, 1984, pp. 131–140.Google Scholar
  15. Mohr, C.O., Table of Equivalent Population of North American Small Mammals, Am. Midl. Nat., 1947, vol. 37, pp. 223–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nikitina, N.A., On Constancy of Area Use by Rodents, in Fauna i ekologiya gryzunov (Rodent Fauna and Ecology), Moscow, 1970, issue 9, pp. 110–133.Google Scholar
  17. Nikitina, N.A., On the Concept of Home Range in Small Mammals, Zool. Zh., 1979, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 1055–1058.Google Scholar
  18. Nikitina, N.A., Bank Voles, in Voprosy teriologii: Itogi mecheniya mlekopitayushchikh (Problems in Theriology: Results of Mammal Marking), Moscow: Nauka, 1980, pp. 189–219.Google Scholar
  19. Schoener, T.W., An Empirically Based Estimate of Home Range, Theor. Pop. Biol., 1981, vol. 20, pp. 281–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shchipanov, N.A. and Kuptsov, A.V., Nonresidence in Small Mammals and Its Role in Population Functionong, Usp. Sovrem. Biol., 2004, no. 1, pp. 28–43.Google Scholar
  21. Shchipanov, N.A., Kalinin, A.A., Oleinichenko, V.Yu., et al., On Methods for Studying Area Use by Shrews, Zool. Zh., 2000, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 362–371.Google Scholar
  22. Slade, N.A. and Russel, L.A., Distances As Indices to Movements and Home-Range Size from Trapping Records of Small Mammals, J. Mammal., 1998, vol. 79, pp. 346–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Slade, N.A. and Swihart, R.K., Home Range Indices for the Hispid Cotton Rat (Sigmodon hispidus) in Northeastern Kansas, J. Mammal., 1983, vol. 64, pp. 580–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Swihard, R.K., Home-Range Attributes and Spatial Structure of Woodchuck Populations, J. Mammal., 1992, vol. 73, pp. 604–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Swihard, R.K. and Slade, N.A., Testing for Independence of Observations in Animal Movements, Ecology, 1985, vol. 66, pp. 1176–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tchabovsky, A., Merritt, J.F., and Aleksandrov, D.Y., Ranging Patterns of Two Syntopic Gerbillid Rodents: a Radiotelemetry and Live-Trapping Study in Semi-Desert Habitat of Kalmykia, Russia, Acta Theriol., 2004, vol. 49, pp. 17–31.Google Scholar
  27. Worton, B.J., Kernel Methods for Estimating the Utilization Distribution in Home-Range Studies, Ecology, 1989, vol. 70, pp. 164–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zaitsev, G.N., Matematicheskaya statistika v eksperimental’noi botanike (Mathematical Statistics in Experimental Botany), Moscow: Nauka, 1984.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© MAIK Nauka 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Severtsov Institute of Ecology and EvolutionRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Tsentrokhotkontrol’ Federal State InstitutionMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations