Advertisement

Doklady Mathematics

, Volume 98, Issue 3, pp 638–640 | Cite as

A Disproof the Le Bars Conjecture about the Zero–One Law for Existential Monadic Second-Order Sentences

  • M. E. ZhukovskiiEmail author
  • S. N. Popova
Mathematics
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

The Le Bars conjecture (2001) states that the binomial random graph G(n, \(\frac{1}{2}\)) obeys the zero–one law for existential monadic sentences with two first-order variables. This conjecture is disproved. Moreover, it is proved that there exists an existential monadic sentence with a single monadic variable and two first-order variables whose truth probability does not converge.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M. E. Zhukovskii and A. M. Raigorodskii, Russ. Math. Surv. 70 (1), 33–81 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Janson, T. Luczak, and A. Rucinski, Random Graphs (Wiley, New York, 2000).CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. H. Spencer, The Strange Logic of Random Graphs (Springer, Berlin, 2001).CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. K. Vereshchagin and A. Shen’, Languages and Calculi (MNTsMO, Moscow, 2000) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. E. Zhukovskii and M. G. Sánchez, Dokl. Math. 96 (3), 598–600 (2017).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.-M. Le Bars, Inf. Process. Lett. 77, 43–48 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. Libkin, Elements of Finite Model Theory (Springer, Berlin, 2004).CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yu. V. Glebskii, D. I. Kogan, M. I. Legon’kii, and V. A. Talanov, Kibernetika 2, 17–27 (1969).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. Fagin, J. Symbol. Logic 41, 50–58 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. E. Zhukovskii and A. E. Medvedeva, Math. Notes 99 (3), 362–367 (2016).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. E. Zhukovskii and L. B. Ostrovskii, Izv. Math. 81 (6), 1155–1167 (2017).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. D. Matushkin and M. E. Zhukovskii, Discrete Appl. Math. 236, 329–346 (2018).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Kaufmann and S. Shelah, Discrete Math. 54, 285–293 (1985).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Kaufmann, “Counterexample to the 0–1 law for existential monadic second-order logic,” Technical Report, CLI Internal Note 32, Computational Logic Inc., December, 1987.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (State University)Dolgoprudnyi, Moscow oblastRussia
  2. 2.Caucasus Mathematical CenterAdyghe State UniversityMaikop, Maikop, Republic of AdygeaRussia

Personalised recommendations