Robust control for a specific class of non-minimum phase dynamical networks

  • I. B. Furtat
Control in Deterministic Systems


The problem of robust control of dynamic networks with non-minimum phase subsystems, where only scalar inputs and outputs are available for measurement, is solved. Conditions on the parameters of the network model and the control system are obtained that ensure that the control algorithm designed for minimum phase network systems remains valid for non-minimum phase network systems as well. Control of the dynamic network in the cases when it includes and does not include a master subsystems is considered. Examples of simulation are presented to illustrate the results.


Dynamic Network Robust Control System Science International Minimum Phase Scalar Input 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    I. V. Miroshnik, V. O. Nikiforov, and A. L. Fradkov, Nonlinear and Adaptive Control of Complex Dynamic Systems (Nauka, St. Petersburg, 2000) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. R. Andrievskii and A. L. Fradkov, Selected Chapters in Automatic Control Theory with Examples in MATLAB (Nauka, St. Petersburg, 1999) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. M. Tsykunov, “Application of adaptive dynamic controller for output control of a plant,” in Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Identification of Systems and Control Problems SICPRO’2005, Moscow, 2005 (Institut problem upravleniya Ross. Akad. Nauk, Moscow, 2005), pp. 1349–1357 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. Hovakimyam, B.-J. Yang, and A. J. Calise, “An adaptive output feedback control methodology for non-minimum phase systems,” in Proc. of the 41st IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, Las Vegas, 2002, pp. 949–954.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. A. Fax and R. M. Murray, “Information flow and cooperative control of vehicle formations,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 49(9), 1465–1476 (2004).CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Z. Li, Z. Duan, and L. Huang, “Leader-follower consensus of multi-agent systems,” Proc. of the American Control Conf., St. Louis, 2009, pp. 3256–3261.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. Ren and R. W. Beard, “Consensus seeking in multiagent systems under dynamically changing interaction topologies,” IEEE Trans. on Autom. Control 50(5), 655–661 (2005).CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. P. Agaev and P. Yu. Chebotarev, “The matrix of maximum out forests of a digraph and its applications,” Autom. Remote Control 61, Part 1, 1424–1450 (2000).zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Das and F. L. Lewis, “Distributed adaptive control for synchronization of unknown nonlinear networked systems,” Automatica 46(12), 2014–2021 (2010).CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. M. Tsykunov, “Robust control algorithms with compensation of bounded perturbations,” Avtom. Telemekh. 68, 1213–1224 (2007).zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. M. Tsykunov, “An algorithm of robust control of a non-stationary linear plant with perturbation compensation,” J. Comput. Syst. Sci. Int. 47, 527–534 (2008).CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    I. B. Furtat, “Robust synchronization of dynamical networks with compensation of disturbances,” Autom. Remote Control 72, 2516–2526 (2011).CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    I. B. Furtat, “Robust synchronization of a network of interrelated nonlinear systems with compensation for disturbances,” Problemy Upravleniya, No. 4, 46–52 (2011).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    I. B. Furtat, “Consensus-based output control of a linear dynamic network with compensation for disturbances,” Mekhatronika, Avtomatizatsiya, Upravl., No. 4, 12–18 (2011).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    V. A. Brusin, “On a class of singularly disturbed adaptive systems. 1,” Avtom. Telemekh., No. 4, 119–127 (1995).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. N. Atassi and H. K. Khalil, “A separation principle for the stabilization of class of nonlinear systems,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 44(9), 1672–1687 (1999).CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    C. Godsil and G. Royle, Algebraic Graph Theory (Springer, New York, 2001).CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Problems of Mechanical EngineeringRussian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.National Research University of Information Technologies, Mechanics, and OpticsSt. PetersburgRussia
  3. 3.St. Petersburg State UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations