Advertisement

Eurasian Soil Science

, Volume 52, Issue 11, pp 1378–1390 | Cite as

Changes in Dominant Perennial Species Affect Soil Hydraulic Properties after Crop Abandonment in a Semiarid Grassland in Mongolia

  • A. YanagawaEmail author
  • H. Fujimaki
  • U. Jamsran
  • T. Okuro
  • K. Takeuchi
SOIL PHYSICS
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

Crop abandonment is a factor responsible for soil degradation in semi-arid regions. The effects of crop abandonment on soil restoration may depend on soil properties and climatic conditions of an area. In particular, soil hydraulic properties affect the vegetation recovery process. The objective of this study was to investigate the succession changes in water flow as a result of changes in soil hydraulic properties after crop abandonment under drought and non-drought conditions, and under water uptake by co-occurring perennial plants to clarify the observation that typical perennial grass species are seldom observed in abandoned fields. Soil hydraulic properties were measured in croplands which had been abandoned for different periods (2, 9, and 18 years ago) and in a grazed grassland site (control site). Hydrological processes in the soil profiles were simulated with soil hydraulic properties under drought and non-drought summer conditions with water uptake from perennial grass species. Suctioning the surface soils increased with the period of abandonment, with this trend being particularly obvious in a drought year. Soil water appears to be restricted in the later succession stage of abandoned fields and in grazed grassland for drought-tolerant plants. Dry soil and climate conditions are important factors determining the intrusion of the typical perennial grass, Stipa krylovii, into degraded abandoned fields. A water availability with low pressure (plant can use with low pressure) made difficult the intrusion of typical perennial grasses to abandoned cropland. This abiotic relation between soil hydraulic properties and climate conditions may play an important role for plant succession in abandoned cropland.

Keywords:

unsaturated hydraulic conductivity water restoration 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study would not have been possible without the willing cooperation of the staff of Hustai National Park. We sincerely thank them all, especially Prof. B. Namkhai (Director, Hustai National Park). We also thank assistant professor S. Okubo and Dr. T. Okayasu (Department of Ecosystem Studies, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo) for their helpful comments.

FUNDING

This study was conducted under the Global Environmental Research Fund of Japan’s Ministry of the Environment “Desertification Control and Restoration of Ecosystem Services in Grassland Regions of North-East Asia” (no. G-071), with the additional support of a JSPS Research Fellowship for Young Scientists awarded to A. Yanagawa (no. 20-7002 and 24-7604).

Supplementary material

11475_2019_1159_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (190 kb)
11475_2019_1159_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    L. R. Ahuja, F. Fiedler, G. H. Dunn, J. G. Benjamin, and A. Garrison, “Changes in soil water retention curves due to tillage and natural reconsolidation,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 62, 1228–1233 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    O. Bazhenova, D. Kobylkin, and E. Tyumentseva, “Aeolian material migration in Transbaikalia (Asian Russia),” Geosciences 9, 41 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Bonet and J. Pausas, “Species richness and cover along a 60-year chronosequence in old-fields of southeastern Spain,” Plant Ecol. 174, 257–270 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. A. Bowman, J. D. Reeder, and R. W. Lober, “Changes in soil properties in a central plains rangeland soil after 3, 20, and 60 years of cultivation,” Soil Sci. 150, 851–857 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Campbell, Soil Physics with BASIC, Vol. 14: Transport Models for Soil-Plant Systems (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1985)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Chen, Y. Bai, L. Zhang, and X. Han, “Comparing physiological responses of two dominant grass species to nitrogen addition in Xilin River basin of China,” Environ. Exp. Bot. 53, 65–75 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    World Reference Base for Soil Resources (Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, 1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. A. Feddes, P. J. Kowalik, and H. Zaradny, Simulation of Field Water Use and Crop Yield (Wiley, New York, 1978)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Fujimaki and M. Inoue, “Reevaluation of the multistep outflow method for determining unsaturated hydraulic conductivity,” Vadose Zone J. 2, 409–415 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. Fujimaki, S. Shiozawa, and M. Inoue, “Effect of salty crust on soil albedo,” Agric. For. Meteorol. 118, 125–135 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. Fujimaki and A. Yanagawa, “Application of evaporation method using two tensiometers for determining unsaturated hydraulic conductivity beyond tensiometric range,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 52, 405–413 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229319040069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. W. Gee and J. W. Bauder, “Particle-size analysis,” in Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1: Physical and Mineralogical Methods, Ed. by A. Klute (American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, 1986), pp. 383–411.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. D. Gunin, E. A. Vostokova, N. I. Dorofeyuk, P. E. Tarasov, and C. C. Black, Vegetation Dynamics of Mongolia (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2013),Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    W. Hilbig, The Vegetation of Mongolia (SPB Academic, Amsterdam, 1995),Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. Hillel, Environmental Soil Physics (Academic, London, 1998),Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. Hobbs and J. Harris, “Restoration ecology: repairing the Earth’s ecosystems in the new millennium,” Restor. Ecol. 9, 239–246 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Hoshino, MSc Thesis in Agricultural Science (University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, 2006).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. Hoshino, K. Tamura, H. Fujimaki, M. Asano, K. Ose, and T. Higashi, “Effects of crop abandonment and grazing exclusion on available soil water and other soil properties in a semi-arid Mongolian grassland,” Soil Tillage Res. 105, 228–235 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. Hoshino, Y. Yoshihara, T. Okuro, J. Undarmaa, and K. Takeuchi, “Effects of vegetation gap on subsequent species richness and cover on abandoned cropland in semi-arid grasslands of Mongolia,” Sand Dune Res. 56, 29–38 (2009).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Q. Hou, Y. Wang, Z. Yang, and G. Shi, “Dynamic simulation and definition of crop coefficient for typical steppe in Inner Mongolia, China,” Chin. J. Plant Ecol. 34, 1414–1423 (2010).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    C. Kosmas, S. Gerontidis, and M. Marathianou, “The effect of land use change on soils and vegetation over various lithological formations on Lesvos (Greece),” Catena 40, 51–68 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    N. Lancaster and A. Baas, “Influence of vegetation cover on sand transport by wind: field studies at Owens Lake, California,” Earth Surf. Process. Landforms 23, 69–82 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Y. Y. Li and M. A. Shao, “Change of soil physical properties under long-term natural vegetation restoration in the Loess Plateau of China,” J. Arid Environ. 64, 77–96 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    L. Y. Liu, X. Y. Li, P. J. Shi, S. Y. Gao, J. H. Wang, W. Q. Ta, Y. Song, M. X. Liu, Z. Wang, and B. L. Xia, “Wind erodibility of major soils in the farming-pastoral ecotone of China,” J. Arid Environ. 68, 611–623 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Y. Matsuura and D. Matsushima, Estimation of evapotranspiration and land-cover with satellite data in semi-arid Mongolia, 2004. https://www.ied.tsukuba.ac.jp/ ~raise/IWSTCM2004/16-Matsuura.pdf.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    L. Natsagdorj, D. Jugder, and Y. S. Chung, “Analysis of dust storms observed in Mongolia during 1937–1999,” Atmos. Environ. 37, 1401–1411 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Y. I. Pankova, “Degradation process on cropland in Mongolia,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 26, 88–98 (1994).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    R. C. Schwartz, S. R. Evett, and P. W. Unger, “Soil hydraulic properties of cropland compared with reestablished and native grassland,” Geoderma 116, 47–60 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    M. Shinoda, G. U. Nachinshonhor, and M. Nemoto, “Impact of drought on vegetation dynamics of the Mongolian steppe: a field experiment,” J. Arid Environ. 74, 63–69 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    “Green Gold” Pasture Ecosystem Management Project (Ulaanbaatar, 2009).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    M. T. van Genuchten, A Numerical Model for Water and Solute Movement in and Below the Root Zone (US Department of Agriculture, Salinity Laboratory, Riverside, CA, 1987).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    R. Wang, L. Chen, Y. Bai, and C. Xiao, “Seasonal dynamics in resource partitioning to growth and storage in response to drought in a perennial rhizomatous grass, Leymus chinensis,” J. Plant Growth Regul. 27, 39–48 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Z. Xu, S. Wan, G. Zhu, H. Ren, and X. Han, “The influence of historical land use and water availability on grassland restoration,” Restor. Ecol. 18, 217–225 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00595.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    A. Yanagawa, H. Fujimaki, T. Okuro, U. Jamsran, and K. Takeuchi, “Comparison of drought tolerances in root water uptake model for two co-occurring grass species in Mongolia,” J. Jpn. Soc. Soil Phys. 130, 3–10 (2015).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    A. Yanagawa, T. Sasaki, U. Jamsran, T. Okuro, and K. Takeuchi, “Factors limiting vegetation recovery processes after cessation of cropping in a semiarid grassland in Mongolia,” J. Arid Environ. 131, 1–5 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2016.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    X. Zhan, L. Li, and W. Cheng, “Restoration of Stipa krylovii steppes in Inner Mongolia of China: assessment of seed banks and vegetation composition,” J. Arid Environ. 68, 298–307 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    W. Z. Zhao, H. L. Xiao, Z. M. Liu, and J. Li, “Soil degradation and restoration as affected by land use change in the semiarid Bashang area, northern China,” Catena 59, 173–186 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Yanagawa
    • 1
    Email author
  • H. Fujimaki
    • 2
  • U. Jamsran
    • 3
  • T. Okuro
    • 4
  • K. Takeuchi
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Systems and Engineering, Meisei University, HinoTokyoJapan
  2. 2.The Division of Appropriate Technology and Science for Sustainable Development, Graduate School of Life and Environment Sciences, Tottori UniversityTottoriJapan
  3. 3.Center for Ecosystem Study, Mongolian State University of AgricultureUlaanbaatarMongolia
  4. 4.Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  5. 5.Integrated Research System for Sustainability Science (IR3S), The University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study (UTIAS)TokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations