Advertisement

Eurasian Soil Science

, Volume 52, Issue 10, pp 1170–1174 | Cite as

Problems of the Cryogenic Soils’ Diagnostics in the Recent Russian Soil Classification System

  • A. V. LupachevEmail author
  • S. V. Gubin
  • M. I. Gerasimova
GENESIS AND GEOGRAPHY OF SOILS
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract—

The paper is targeted at positioning the cryogenic soils in the recent classification system of Russian soils. An on-line discussion and recent publications demonstrated significant differences in conceptual approaches to cryogenic soils, as well as their unaccounted diversity in the permafrost zone and their dynamics in time (e.g., during the thawing period) that create problems for their classification. In particular, the results depend on the observation time. Diagnostic properties of cryogenic horizon and the depth of the active layer were in the center of the discussion. Possible changes in the list of soil types and subtypes are proposed for the next approximation of the Russian soil classification system. The Cryozem order is proposed for the soils with the cryogenic diagnostic horizon (CR) and the maximum active layer depth of 1 m and less. Soils with other diagnostic horizons and with the active layer depth of more than 1 m should be accounted as permafrost-affected soils within the other orders of the soil classification system. Authors invite colleagues to further discussion with the aim to establish standard classification criteria for cryogenic soils.

Keywords:

soil diagnostics cryozem Cryosol cryogenic diagnostic horizon permafrost 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are sincerely grateful to S.V. Goryachkin, D.G. Fyodorov-Davydov, E.V. Abakumov, G.V. Matushak, O.Yu. Goncharova, A.A. Bobrik, B.A. Pavlova, I.S. Mikhailov, S.F. Khokhlov, D.A. Kaverin, E.V. Zhangurov, A.A. Dymov and R. Sletten for the discussion, critical remarks, and valuable suggestions used in the paper preparation.

FUNDING

The data were obtained in the framework of State Research Tasks nos. АААА-А18-118013190182-3 and AААА-А18-118013190181-6.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    V. A. Vtorushin, Candidate’s Dissertation in Biology (Irkutsk, 1973).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Geocryological Dictionary, Ed. by G. I. Dubikov, (GEOS, Moscow, 2003) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    GOST (State Standard) 25100-2011: Soils, Classification (Standartinform, Moscow, 2011) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. V. Gubin, “Dynamics of the upper permafrost boundary and humus retinization in tundra soils of Northeastern Russia,” in Problems of Soil Evolution (Pushchino, 2003), pp. 168–172.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. V. Gubin and A. V. Lupachev, “Soil formation and the underlying permafrost,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 41, 574–585 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. V. Gubin and A. V. Lupachev, “Soils of loamy watersheds of coastal tundra in the north of Yakutia: pedogenetic conditions and processes,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 50, 133–141 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229317020041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. V. Gubin and A. V. Lupachev, “The role of frost boils in the development of cryozems on coastal lowlands of northern Yakutia,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 50, 1243–1254 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229317110072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. V. Gubin and A. V. Lupachev, “Suprapermafrost horizons of the accumulation of raw organic matter in tundra cryozems of Northern Yakutia,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 51, 772–781 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229318070049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. N. Ivanova, Classification of Soils of the Soviet Union (Nauka, Moscow, 1976) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    N. A. Karavaeva and V. O. Targulian, “The distribution of humus in tundra soils of northern Yakutia,” Pochvovedenie, No. 12, 36–45 (1960).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Classification of Russian Soils (Dokuchaev Soil Science Inst., Moscow, 1997) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    L. L. Shishov, V. D. Tonkonogov, I. I. Lebedeva, and M. I. Gerasimova, Classification and Diagnostic System of Russian Soils (Oikumena, Smolensk, 2004) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yu. A. Liverovskii, “Soils of the extreme north: genesis and classification,” Pochvovedenie, No. 5, 5–15 (1983).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. V. Lupachev and S. V. Gubin, “Suprapermafrost organic-accumulative horizons in the tundra cryozems of northern Yakutia,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 45, 45–55 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    O. V. Makeev, Facies of Soil Cryogenesis and Specificity of the Morphology of Soil Profiles in Them (Nauka, Moscow, 1981) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    O. V. Makeev, “Soil, permafrost, and cryopedology,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 32, 854–863 (1999).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    N. S. Mergelov and V. O. Targulian, “Accumulation of organic matter in the mineral layers of permafrost-affected soils of coastal lowlands in East Siberia,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 44, 249–260 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    N. S. Mergelov, “Postpyrogenic transformation of soils and carbon reserves in pre-tundra scarce forests of Kolyma Lowland: cascade effect and feedbacks,” Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., No. 3, 129–140 (2015).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    E. M. Naumov, “General types of genetic soil profiles and specific soil cover of the taiga zone of Extreme Northeast of Asia,” in Proceedings of All-Union Symposium “Biological Problems of the North” (Magadan, 1973), Part 1, pp. 48–55.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Field Guide for Identification of Russian Soils (Dokuchaev Soil Science Inst., Moscow, 2008) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    I. A. Sokolov, “Hydromorphic non-gley soil formation,” Pochvovedenie, No. 1, 21–32. 1980.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    I. A. Sokolov, “Diversity of hydromorphic non-gley soil formation,” Pochvovedenie, No. 1, 5–18 (1980).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    I. A. Sokolov, Pedogenesis and Exogenesis (Dokuchaev Soil Science Inst., Moscow, 1997) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yu. L. Shur, The Upper Horizon of Permafrost and Thermokarst (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1988) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    CALM summary data table. https://www2.gwu.edu/ ~calm/data/north.htmlGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    IUSS Working Group WRB, World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, Update 2015, International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps, World Soil Resources Reports No. 106 (Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, 2015).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    A. Jones, V. Stolbovoy, C. Tarnocai, G. Broll, O. Spaargaren, and L. Montanarella, Soil Atlas of the Northern Circumpolar Region (European Commission, Luxembourg, 2010).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    A. V. Lupachev, M. I. Gerasimova, S. V. Goryachkin S. V., Gubin, D. G. Fyodorov-Davydov, L. A. Fominykh, G. V. Matyshak, O. Yu. Goncharova, A. A. Bobrik, V. V. Startsev, E. V. Zhangurov, A. A. Dymov, D. A. Kaverin, I. S. Mikhailov, S. F. Khokhlov, et al., “Classification of cryogenic soils in the current Russian soil classification system: results of online discussion,” in Proceedings of the International Permafrost Conference “Earth’s Cryosphere: Past, Present and Future,” Pushchino, Russia, June 4–8, 2017, Abstracts of Papers (Pushchino, 2017), pp. 163–165.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Soil Survey Staff, Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 12th ed. (US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DC, 2014).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    C. L. Ping, J. G. Bockheim, J. M. Kimble, G. J. Michaelson, and D. A. Walker, “Characteristics of cryogenic soils along a latitudinal transect in arctic Alaska,” J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 103, 28917–28928 (1998).  https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD02024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    C. L. Ping, J. D. Jastrow, M. T. Jorgenson, G. J. Michaelson, and Y. L. Shur, “Permafrost soils and carbon cycling,” Soil 1, 147–171 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-1-147-2015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Soil Classification Working Group, The Canadian System of Soil Classification (NRC Research Press, Ottawa, 1998).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    C. Tarnocai and C. A. S. Smith, “The formation and properties of soils in the permafrost region of Canada,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Cryopedology “The Effects of Cryogenesis on the Processes and Peculiarities of Soil Formation” (Pushchino, 1992), pp. 21–42.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    C. Tarnocai, J. G. Canadell, E. A. G. Schuur, P. Kuhry, G. Mazhitova, and S. A. Zimov, “Soil organic carbon pools in the northern circumpolar permafrost region,” Global Biogeochem. Cycle 23, GB2023 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003327 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    J. C. F. Tedrow, Soils of the Polar Landscapes (Rutgers Univ. Press, New Brunswick, 1974).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. V. Lupachev
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. V. Gubin
    • 1
  • M. I. Gerasimova
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Physicochemical and Biological Problems in Soil Science, Russian Academy of SciencesPushchinoRussia
  2. 2.Lomonosov Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations