Advertisement

Eurasian Soil Science

, Volume 51, Issue 12, pp 1474–1479 | Cite as

Influence of Soil Salinity on the Population of Oribatid Mites in the Forest-Steppe Zone of Western Siberia

  • M. V. YakutinEmail author
  • V. S. Andrievskii
  • L. Yu. Anopchenko
SOIL BIOLOGY
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

The research was performed in the center of the Baraba Plain. It was demonstrated that soil salinity exerts a considerable effect on oribatid mites. Several stages of changes in the population of oribatid mites upon soil evolution on the dried bottom of salt lake in the forest-steppe zone of Western Siberia were identified. At the stage of solonchakous meadow soils (Mollic Gleysols (Salic)), oribatid mites formed a multi-species low-number group. At the stage of medium-deep solonetzes (Gleyic Solonetzes) and chernozemic meadow soils (Luvic Chernozems), the species richness and abundance of oribatid mites increased by about 2–3.5 times. The appeared species were sensitive to high soil salinity and could not survive in the meadow soil. Changes in the soil salinity led to changes in the ecological status of species: some of them occupied dominant positions, and others lost them.

Keywords:

Baraba Plain forest-steppe zone Mollic Gleysol (Salic) Gleyic Solonetz Luvic Chernozem evolution salinity species richness oribatid mites abundance 

Notes

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    V. S. Andrievskii, “Oribatid mites in soils of Siberia,” Pochvovedenie, No. 12, 84–89 (1994).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. S. Andrievskii and M. V. Yakutin, “The influence of salinization on oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatida) and microorganisms communities in underground block of dry steppe ecosystem in South Tuva,” Evraziat. Entomol. Zh. 15 (5), 443–449 (2016).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. V. Arinushkina, Practical Manual for the Chemical Analysis of Soils (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 1970) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    O. G. Berezina, “Springtails (Hexapoda, Collembola) in salt lake catenas of the southern forest-steppe of Western Siberia,” Evraziat. Entomol. Zh. 5 (3), 199–202 (2006).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. A. Byzov, Zoo-microbial Interactions in Soil (GEOS, Moscow, 2005) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. A. Vainshtein, “On some methods to estimate similarity of biocenoses,” Zool. Zh. 46 (7), 981–986 (1967).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. G. Zvyagintsev, I. P. Bab’eva, and G. M. Zenova, Biology of Soils (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 2005) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Methods of Soil Zoological Studies, Ed. by M. S. Gilyarov (Nauka, Moscow, 1975) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Microarthropods, Soils, and Vegetation in Conditions of Pulsating Moistening of Karasuk Plain (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1991) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. I. Pankova, “Salt-affected soils of Russia: solved and unsolved problems,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 48, 115–127 (2015). doi 10.1134/S106422931502009XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oribatid Mites, Ed. by D. A. Krivolutskii (Nauka, Moscow, 1995) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pulsating Chany Lake, Ed. by N. P. Smirnova and A. V. Shninikov (Nauka, Leningrad, 1982) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. R. Striganova, “The structure and functions of communities of soil animals,” in Structural and Functional Role of Soil in the Biosphere (GEOS, Moscow, 1999) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yu. I. Chernov, “Biodiversity: essence and problems,” Usp. Sovrem. Biol. 111 (4), 499–509 (1991).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. D. Shtirts and M. S. Yaroshenko, “Oribatid mites as the biological indicator of environmental impact of Artemsol’ salt mining (Soledar city),” Probl. Ekol. Okhrany Prirod. Tekh. Reg., No. 1 (12), 179–185 (2012).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    V. V. Yakhontov, Ecology of Insects (Vysshaya Shkola, Moscow, 1964) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    G. E. De, R. N. Sharma, J. K. Mazumder, and S. K. Das, “Studies on the population structure of soil microarthropods in saline and non-saline soils of North and South 24-Parganas districts of West Bengal,” Rec. Zool. Surv. India 109 (2), 73–78 (2009).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. K. Dey, A. K. Hazra, and A. K. Sanyal, “Effect of soil salinity on the population dynamics of soil arthropods fauna at Nayachar Island of Midnapore district,” Environ. Ecol. 23 (4), 267–269 (2005).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    H.-D. Engelmann, “Zur Dominanzklassifizierung von Bodenarthropoden,” Pedobiologia 18, 378–380 (1978).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. K. Sanyal, “Ecology of soil oribatid mites in an uncultivated field of Gangetic delta of West Bengal in relation to soil pH and salinity,” in Progress in Soil Biology and Ecology in India, UAS Technical Series No. 37 (Bangalore, 1981), pp. 107–112.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    I. Szabolcs, Salt Affected Soils (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1988).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    G. Weigmann, “Zur Okologie der Collembolan und Oribatiden im Grenzbereichland-Meer (Collembola, Insecta–Oribatei, Acari),” Z. Wiss. Zool. Leipzig 186, 295–391 (1973).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. S. Zaitsev and N. B. Pystina, “Remarks on fauna and population of oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatida) in Priazovsky National Wildlife Sanctuary (Southern Russia),” Soil Org. 86 (1), 59–66 (2014).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. V. Yakutin
    • 1
    Email author
  • V. S. Andrievskii
    • 1
  • L. Yu. Anopchenko
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Soil Science and Agrochemistry, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussia
  2. 2.Siberian State University of Geosystems and TechnologyNovosibirskRussia

Personalised recommendations