Advertisement

Eurasian Soil Science

, Volume 48, Issue 6, pp 578–583 | Cite as

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the soils of Moscow

  • E. A. BelinskayaEmail author
  • G. V. Zykova
  • S. Yu. Semenov
  • G. G. Finakov
Soil Chemistry

Abstract

The contents of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soil samples taken in the city of Moscow have been determined. A sixfold excess of the maximum permissible concentration (MPC) for benzo[a]pyrene has been found in 66% of the studied samples; an excess of the European standard for benzo[a]pyrene has been observed in 31% of the samples. The found weight fraction of benzo[a]pyrene in soil samples varies in the range of 10–740 μg/kg. The content of the ecotoxicant in the soil increases from west to east. The total concentrations of 10 indicative PAH compounds in the soils of Moscow are usually lower than the European standard. An excess of the European standard by 2–6 times has been noted in the Southeastern, Eastern, and Central administrative districts of Moscow, with separate sites of high contamination up to 6118 μg/kg.

Keywords

PAHs benzo[a]pyrene high-performance liquid chromatography soil pollution 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    GN (State Regulation) 2.1.7.2041-06: Maximum Permissible Concentration (MPC) of Chemical Substances in Soil [in Russian].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    GOST (State Standard) 17.4.3.01-83: Nature Protection. Soils. General Requirements to Sampling [in Russian].Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    GOST (State Standard) 17.4.4.02-84: Nature Protection. Soils. Methods of Sampling and Preparation of Material for Chemical, Bacteriological, and Helminthological Analysis [in Russian]Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A Review of Human Carcinogens: Monograph International Centre for Research on Cancer, 1987.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. N. Maistrenko and N. A. Klyuev, Ecologo-Analytical Monitoring of Stable Organic Pollutants (BINOM. Laboratoriya Znanii, Moscow, 2004) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    FR 1.31.2011.10092. Measurement Method of Mass Concentration of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Including Their Chlorine- and Nitrogen-Containing Derivatives (PAH/chlorine, NitroPAH) in Samples of Soils, Grounds, Bottom Sediments Determined by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (Russian Federal Medical-Biological Agency, Moscow, 2014).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    F. Ya. Rovinskii, T. A. Teplitskaya, and T. A. Alekseeva, Background Monitoring of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 1988) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. I. Agapkina, P. A. Chikov, A. A. Shelepchikov, E. S. Brodskii, D. B. Feshin, N. G. Bukhan’ko, and S. P. Balashova, “Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soils of Moscow,” Moscow Univ. Soil Sci. Bull. 62(3), 149–158 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    K. Banger, G. S. Toor, T. Chirenje, and L. Ma, “Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban soils of different land uses in Miami, Florida,” Soil Sediment Contam. 10, 231–243 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Circular of Target Values and Intervention Values for Soil Remediation (Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning, and Environment, Hague, Netherlands, 2000).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. O. Grimalt, B. L. van Drooge, A. Ribes, P. Fernández, and P. Appleby, “Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons composition in soils and sediments of high altitude lakes,” Environ. Pollut. 131, 13–24 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. D. Kimbrough, “The toxicity of polychlorinated polycyclic compounds and related chemicals,” CRC Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2(4), 445–498 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. Kumari, A. K. Attri, and B. R. Gurjar, “Impact of CNG on emissions of PAHs and PCDDs/Fs from the road transport in Delhi,” Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2, 394–399 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. Plachá, H. Raclavská, D. Matysek, and M. H. Rümmeli, “The polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons concentration in soils in the region of Valasske Mezirici, the Czech Republic,” Geochem. Trans. 10, 12 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    C. Pies, Y. Yang, and T. Hofman, “Distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in floodplain soils of the Mosel and Saar River,” J. Soils Sediments 7(4), 216–222 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    TomTom International, TomTom Congestion Index, 2013. http://www.tomtom.com. Cited July 23, 2014.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Toxicological profile for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, GA, 1995).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Geological atlas of Moscow city. http://www.georesurs.su/Georesurs/AtlasMos/Raznoe/RMap.php?name=Relt. Cited July 23, 2014.
  19. 19.
    Average annual wind rose of Moscow city. http://www.retromap.ru/show_pid.php?pid=g2123. Cited July 23, 2014.
  20. 20.
    Ecological atlas of Moscow: Eastern Administrative District. http://www.ecology.ru/index.php?area=1&p=static&page=ec_atlas#vost. Cited July 23, 2014.
  21. 21.
    Official webpage of the Russian Federal Service of State Registration, Cadastre, and Mapping of the Lands. http://www.rosreestr.ru/kadastr/zemlya_monit/rek_zem. Cited July 23, 2014.
  22. 22.
    Official webpage of the Prefecture of Moscow Northern Administrative District. http://www.sao.mos.ru/spravochni/plants/?PAGEN_1=2. Cited July 23, 2014.
  23. 23.
    Official webpage of the Prefecture of Moscow Eastern Administrative District. http://www.vaomos.ru. Cited July 23, 2014.

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. A. Belinskaya
    • 1
    Email author
  • G. V. Zykova
    • 1
  • S. Yu. Semenov
    • 1
  • G. G. Finakov
    • 1
  1. 1.Research and Technical Center of Radiation-Chemical Safety and HygieneFederal Medical-Biological Agency of Russian FederationMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations