Advertisement

Eurasian Soil Science

, Volume 44, Issue 12, pp 1304–1314 | Cite as

Palevye (pale) soils of Central Yakutia: Genetic specificity, properties, and classification

  • R. V. DesyatkinEmail author
  • S. N. Lesovaya
  • M. V. Okoneshnikova
  • T. S. Zaitseva
Genesis and Geography of Soils

Abstract

Permafrost-affected palevye (pale) soils of Central Yakutia are developed from mantle calcareous deposits of different textures and are characterized by the common mica-chloritic association of clay minerals with a higher content of chlorite in comparison with the soils developed from mantle loams and loess-like loams in the European part of Russia. In the pale soils, the distribution of clay minerals in the profile has an even pattern in the loamy variants and a differentiated pattern typical of podzols in the loamy sandy variants. Data on the chemical extracts and Mössbauer spectroscopy indicate that the iron in the pale soils is mainly fixed in silicate minerals. The content of nonsilicate iron represented by the amorphous and weakly crystallized compounds in the pale soils is relatively low. The humus-accumulative horizon in these soils is close to the gray-humus (soddy) AY horizon according to its acid-base characteristics (the soil pH and the degree of base saturation) despite the presence of exchangeable sodium and the shallow occurrence of the calcareous horizon.

Keywords

Humus Chlorite EURASIAN Soil Science Clay Fraction Physical Clay 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    I. P. Gerasimov, “Specificity of Genetic Soil Types in Siberia,” in Siberian Geographic Digest (Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow, 1963), pp. 10–25 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. V. Goryachkin, S. N. Lesovaya, and D. E. Konyushkov, “Soils Developed from Calcareous-Bound Rocks in the Baikal Region: Pedoclimatic Specificity of the Their Chemical and Mineralogical Properties and Genesis,” in Genesis, Geography, and Ecology of Soils (Lviv, 2008), pp. 205–213 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. P. Gradusov, “The World Map of Soil-Forming and Underlying Rocks, Its Genetic and Geographic Analysis, and the Regularities of Soil Formation,” Pochvovedenie, No. 2, 180–195 (2000) [Eur. Soil Sci. 33 (2), 156–169 (2000)].Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. V. Desyatkin, Soil Formation in Thermokarst Depressions (Alases) of the Permafrost Zone (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 2008) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. V. Desyatkin, M. V. Okoneshnikova, and A. R. Desyatkin, Soils of Yakutia, (Bichik, Yakutsk, 2009) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. G. Elovskaya, Classification and Diagnostics of Permafrost-Affected Soils of Yakutia (YaF SO Akad. Nauk SSSR, Yakutsk, 1987) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. G. Zol’nikov, “Soils of the Eastern Part of Central Yakutia and Their Use,” in Materials on the Environmental Conditions and Agriculture in Central Yakutia (Izd. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow, 1954), Vol. 4, pp. 55–222 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. N. Ivanova, “Soils of Central Yakutia,” Pochvovedenie, No. 9, 3–17 (1971).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Classification and Diagnostic System of Russian Soils (Oikumena, Smolensk, 2004) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. N. Konishchev, M. P. Lebedeva-Verba, V. V. Rogov, and E. E. Stalina, Cryogenesis in the Late Pleistocene Deposits of Altai and Periglacial Regions of Europe (GEOS, Moscow, 2005) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    V. I. Popov, D. A. Khramov, and F. I. Lobanov, “Shape of the Absorber: Effect on Mössbauer Spectrum Parameters,” in Proc. of the All-Union “Volga” Conf. on Mässbauer Spectroscopy (Mosk. Fiziko-Tekhnich. Inst., Moscow, 1988), pp. 32–33 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    I. A. Sokolov, “Some Theoretical Results and Problems of Soil Studies in East Siberia and the Far East,” Pochvovedenie, No. 5, 131–145 (1991).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    I. A. Sokolov, T. V. Tursina, and N. I. Belousova, “Recent Podzolization on the Plains of Central Yakutia,” Pochvovedenie, No. 12, 22–29 (1969).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    T. A. Sokolova, Clay Minerals in Soils of Humid Regions of the Soviet Union (Nauka, Sib. otdel., Novosibirsk, 1985) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    V. D. Tonkonogov, B. P. Gradusov, N. E. Rubilina, et al., “On the Differentiation of the Mineralogical and Chemical Compositions of Soddy-Podzolic and Podzolic Soils,” Pochvovedenie, No. 3, 68–81 (1987).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. F. Aspandiar and R. Eggleton, “Weathering of Chlorite: I. Reaction and Products in Microsystems Controlled by the Primary Mineral,” Clays Clay Miner. 50(6), 685–698 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. Bigham, R. W. Fitzpatrick, and D. G. Schulze, “Iron oxides,” in Soil Mineralogy with Environmental Applications, D. Dixon and D. G. Schulze (Eds.), (SSSA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 2002), pp. 323–367.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    IMA MICA Report, “Nomenclature of the Micas,” Am. Mineral., p. 1366 (1998).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    T. He and S. J. Traina, “Transformation of Magnetite to Goethite under Alkaline pH Conditions,” Clay Miner. 42(1), 13–19 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. V. Desyatkin
    • 1
  • S. N. Lesovaya
    • 2
  • M. V. Okoneshnikova
    • 1
  • T. S. Zaitseva
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Biological Problems of the Cryolithozone, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of SciencesYakutskRussia
  2. 2.Department of Geography and GeoecologySt. Petersburg State UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia
  3. 3.Institute of Precambrian Geology and GeochronologyRussian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations