Advertisement

A New Invariant to Illumination Feature Descriptor for Pattern Recognition

  • J. Diaz-EscobarEmail author
  • V. I. KoberEmail author
  • V. N. KarnaukhovEmail author
  • J. A. Gonzalez-Fraga
MATHEMATICAL MODELS AND COMPUTATIONAL METHODS
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract—A new descriptor for describing features in gray-scale images that is invariant to nonuniform illumination is proposed. The suggested method for the feature descriptor design is based on a local energy model which is a biologically plausible model of the visual system. The algorithm for feature detection and construction of the descriptor uses the scale-space monogenic signal framework and a modified algorithm for calculation of the histogram of oriented gradients based on the phase congruence of the signals. The results of computer simulation show that the proposed descriptor provides excellent detection and matching of features at nonuniform illumination, noise, and minor geometric distortions in comparison with known descriptors.

Keywords: feature descriptor nonuniform illumination phase congruency monogenic signal histogram of oriented gradients 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, grant no. 15-19-10010.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    A. Andreopoulos and J. K. Tsotsos, “50 years of object recognition: Directions forward,” Comput. Vision Image Understanding 117, 827–891 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    BVK V. Kumar, A. Mahalanobis, and R. D. Juday, Correlation Pattern Recognition (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2005).CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. O. Duda, P. E. Hart, and D. G. Stork, Pattern Classification (Wiley, 2007).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. Tuytelaars, K. Mikolajczyk, et al. “Local invariant feature detectors: a survey,” Foundat. and Trends in Comput. Graph. & Vision 3,177–280 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. H. Hubel, J. Wensveen, and B. Wick, Eye, Brain, and Vision (Sci. Am. Library, New York, 1995).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Gladilin and R. Eils, “On the role of spatial phase and phase correlation in vision, illusion, and cognition,” Frontiers in Comput. Neurosci. 9, 45 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    F. Attneave, “Some informational aspects of visual perception,” Psycholog. Rev. 61, 183 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Morrone M. Concetta, J. Ross, D. C. Burr, and R. Owens, “Mach bands are phase dependent,” Nature 324 (6094), 250–253 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Morrone M. Concetta and R. A. Owens, “Feature detection from local energy,” Pattern Recogn. Lett. 6, 303–313 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Morrone M. Concetta and D. C. Burr, “Feature detection in human vision: A phase-dependent energy model,” Proc. R. Soc. B: Biolog. Sci. 235 (1280), 221–245 (1988).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. Robbins and R. Owens, “2d feature detection via local energy,” Image and Vision Comput. 15, 353–368 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Kovesi, “Image features from phase congruency,” J. Comp. Vision Res. 1 (3), 1–26 (1999).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. Kovesi et al., “Edges are not just steps,” in Proc. 5th Asian Conf. Comput. Vision, (ACCV 2002), Melbourne, 2002, Vol. 8, pp. 22–8.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. Kovesi, “Phase congruency: A low-level image invariant,” Psycholog. Res. 64, 136–148 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Felsberg and G. Sommer, “The monogenic signal,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 49, 3136–3144 (2001).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Felsberg and G. Sommer, “The monogenic scale-space: A unifying approach to phase-based image processing in scale-space,” J. Math. Imag. and Vision 21 (1), 5–26 (2004).MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    C. Harris and M. Stephens, “A combined corner and edge detector,” in Proc. Alvey Vision Conf., CiteSeer, 15, 10–5244 (1988).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    N. Dalal and B. Triggs, “Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection,” Comput. Vision and Pattern Recogn. (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. Diaz-Escobar and V. Kober, “A robust hog-based descriptor for pattern recognition,” SPIE Opt. Eng.+ Appl., pp. 99712.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    V. H. Diaz-Ramirez, K. Picos, and V. Kober, “Target tracking in nonuniform illumination conditions using locally adaptive correlation filters,” Opt. Comm. 323, 32–43 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    D. G. Lowe, “Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints,” Int. J. Comput. Vision 60, 91–110 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    H. Bay, T. Tuytelaars, and L. Van Gool, “Surf: Speeded up robust features,” in Proc. Eur. Conf.on Computer Vision, 2006 (Springer-Verlag, 2006), pp. 404–417.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Scientific Research and Higher Education at EnsenadaEnsenadaMexico
  2. 2.Kharkevich Institute for Information Transmission Problems, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  3. 3.Chelyabinsk State UniversityChelyabinskRussia
  4. 4.Autonomous University of Baja CaliforniaEnsenadaMexico

Personalised recommendations