Advertisement

Technical Physics

, Volume 63, Issue 9, pp 1375–1383 | Cite as

Imaging in Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine

  • N. V. Denisova
INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT AND DEVICES FOR PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) are modern methods for visualization in diagnostic nuclear medicine. SPECT is known as a workhorse in cardiology, and PET is the gold standard in oncology. The development of nuclear medicine is provided by cooperation of physicists, mathematicians, biologists, medical doctors, and radio-chemists. In spite of extensive clinical applications, several problems may lead to false diagnoses. In particular, the correction of attenuation of gamma radiation in human organs must be taken into account. For interpretation and evaluation of such an effect on the clinical results, we perform physico-mathematical simulation of the SPECT diagnostics in cardiology in the absence and presence of the correction of attenuation. A brief review of the state-of-the art is presented. The simulation employs the first Russian anthropomorphic mathematical phantom that describes the distribution of radio-pharmacological agent (99m Tc-methoxyisobutylisonitrile) in chest organs of a typical male patient. A model for calculation of raw images is developed with allowance for attenuation of radiation in biological tissues and the effect of collimator and detector. The results of the proposed models and calculated images are compared with clinical images obtained at the Meshalkin Institute of Circulation Pathology (Novosibirsk) and Myasnikov Institute of Clinical Cardiology (Moscow). Statistical algorithms are developed for the solution of the inverse problem of image reconstruction based on the entropy principle. The clinical and physico-mathematical approaches are compared in the evaluation of the effect of correction on the quality of reconstructed images of the left ventricle of myocardium.

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported in part by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 17-52-14004 ANF_a).

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Emission Tomography: The Fundamentals of PET and SPECT, Ed. by M. N. Wernick and J. N. Aarsvold (Elsevier, 2004).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    F. Elvas, J. Boddaert, C. Vangestel, K. Pak, B. Gray, S. Kumar-Singh, S. Staelens, S. Stroobants, and L. Wyffels, J. Nucl. Med. 58, 665 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. F. Hutton, EJNMMI Phys. 1, 2 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. L. Bailey, EJNMMI Phys. 1, 4 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. B. Sergienko and A. A. Ansheles, in Cardiology Manual, Vol. 2: Diagnostic Techniques for Cardiovascular Diseases, Ed. by E. I. Chazov (Praktika, Moscow, 2014), p. 571.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. A. Ansheles, Vestn. Rentgenol. Radiol., No. 2, 5 (2014).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Hendel, J. Nucl. Cardiol. 9, 135 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    X. G. Xu, Phys. Med. Biol. 59, R233 (2014).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. P. Segars and B. M. W. Tsui, IEEE Proc. 97, 1954 (2009).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    N. V. Denisova, V. P. Kurbatov, and I. N. Terekhov, Med. Fiz., No. 2, 55 (2014).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. V. Denisova and I. N. Terekhov, Med. Fiz., No. 3, 87 (2016).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    N. V. Denisova and I. N. Terekhov, Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express 2, 055015 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. A. Patton and T. G. Turkington, J. Nucl. Med. Technol. 36, 1 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. R. Formiconi, Phys. Med. Biol. 43, 3359 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    L. A. Shepp and Y. Vardi, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 1, 113 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    H. M. Hudson and R. S. Larkin, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 13, 601 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. A. Ansheles, S. P. Mironov, D. N. Shul’gin, and V. B. Sergienko, Luchevaya Diagn. Ter., No. 3, 87 (2016).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    G. Germano, P. Slomka, and D. Berman, J. Nucl. Cardiol. 14, 25 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. Cuocolo, Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 38, 1887 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    C. A. Savvopoulos, T. Spyridonidis, N. Papandrianos, P. J. Vassilakos, D. Alexopoulos, and D. J. Apostolopoulos, J. Nucl. Cardiol. 21, 519 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussia

Personalised recommendations