Physics of the Solid State

, Volume 58, Issue 12, pp 2488–2493 | Cite as

Anomalous behavior of curves of pseudo-elastic deformation of Ni–Fe–Ga–Co alloy crystals as a result of interphase stresses

  • G. A. Malygin
  • V. I. Nikolaev
  • A. I. Averkin
  • A. P. Zograf
Mechanical Properties, Physics of Strength, and Plasticity


The compression diagram of Ni49Fe18Ga27Co6 alloy crystals in the [011] direction was studied until full shape memory strain at various temperatures in the range of 259–340 K. It is found that all load curves are anomalously shaped and contain portions of sharp and gradual decreases in deformation stresses. Simulation of pseudo-elastic stress–strain curves within the theory of diffuse martensitic transitions, describing not only equilibrium of phases, but also the kinetics of the transition between them, shows that elastic interphase stresses during martensitic reactions Ll 2 → 14M and 14MLl 0 characteristic of this alloy can be responsible for the extraordinary shape of compression diagrams.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    V. I. Nikolaev, P. N. Yakushev, G. A. Malygin, and S. A. Pul’nev, Tech. Phys. Lett. 36 (10), 914 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. I. Nikolaev, G. A. Malygin, S. A. Pulnev, P. N. Yakushev, and V. M. Egorov, Mater. Sci. Forum 738/739, 51 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. I. Nikolaev, P. N. Yakushev, G. A. Malygin, A. I. Averkin, A. V. Chikiryaka, and S. A. Pulnev, Tech. Phys. Lett. 40 (2), 123 (2014).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. I. Nikolaev, P. N. Yakushev, G. A. Malygin, A. I. Averkin, S. A. Pulnev, G. P. Zograf, S. B. Kustov, and A. I. Chumlyakov, Tech. Phys. Lett. 42 (4), 399 (2016).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. A. Malygin, Phys.—Usp. 44 (2), 173 (2001).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. A. Malygin, Phys. Solid State 43 (10), 1989 (2001).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. Panchenko, Yu. Chumlyakov, H. J. Maier, E. Timofeeva, and I. Karaman, Intermetallics 18, 2438 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. J. Salzbrenner and M. Cohen, Acta Metall. 27, 739 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. E. Timofeeva, E. Yu. Panchenko, Yu. I. Chumlyakov, and H. Maier, Russ. Phys. J. 54 (12), 1427 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    N. Ozdemir, I. Karaman, N. A. Mara, Yu. I. Chumlyakov, and H. E. Karaca, Acta Mater. 60, 5670 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. A. Malygin, Phys. Solid State 44 (11), 2072 (2002).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. I. Nikolaev, S. A. Pul’nev, G. A. Malygin, V. V. Shpeizman, and S. P. Nikanorov, Phys. Solid State 49 (10), 1878 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. A. Malygin
    • 1
  • V. I. Nikolaev
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. I. Averkin
    • 1
  • A. P. Zograf
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Ioffe InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesSt.PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.National Research University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and OpticsSt.PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations