Abstract
A theoretical model that effectively describes stress-driven migration of low-angle tilt grain boundaries in nanocomposites with nanocrystalline or ultrafine-grained metallic matrices containing ensembles of coherent nanoinclusions has been developed. Within this model, low-angle tilt boundaries have been considered as walls of edge dislocations that, under the influence of stress, slip in the metallic matrix and can penetrate into nanoinclusions. The dislocation dynamics simulation has revealed three main regimes of the stress-driven migration of low-angle grain boundaries. In the first regime, migrating grain boundaries are completely retarded by nanoinclusions and their migration is quickly terminated, while dislocations forming grain boundaries reach equilibrium positions. In the second regime, some segments of the migrating grain boundaries are pinned by nanoinclusions, whereas the other segments continue to migrate over long distances. In the third regime, all segments of grain boundaries (except for the segments located at the boundaries of inclusions) migrate over long distances. The characteristics of these regimes have been investigated, and the critical shear stresses for transitions between the regimes have been calculated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. K. Mukherjee, Mater. Sci. Eng., A 322, 1 (2002).
I. A. Ovid’ko, Int. Mater. Rev. 50, 65 (2005).
M. Kawasaki and T. G. Langdon, J. Mater. Sci. 42, 1782 (2007).
M. Dao, L. Lu, R. J. Asaro, J. T. M. De Hosson, and E. Ma, Acta Mater. 55, 4041 (2007).
C. S. Pande and K. P. Cooper, Prog. Mater. Sci. 54, 689 (2009).
G. A. Malygin, Phys.—Usp. 54 (11), 1091 (2011).
I. A. Ovid’ko and T. G. Langdon, Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 30, 103 (2012).
R. Z. Valiev, I. Sabirov, A. P. Zhilyaev, and T. G. Langdon, JOM 64, 641134 (2012).
Y. T. Zhu, X. Z. Liao, and X.-L. Wu, Prog. Mater. Sci. 57, 1 (2012).
Y. Estrin and A. Vinogradov, Acta Mater. 61, 782 (2013).
R. F. Al’mukhametov, L. A. Gabdrakhmanova, I. Z. Sharipov, and Ya. F. Abzgil’din, Phys. Solid State 56 (2), 223 (2014).
O. A. Maslova, F. V. Shirokov, Yu. I. Yuzyuk, M. E. Marssi, M. Jain, N. Ortega, and R. S. Katiyar, Phys. Solid State 56 (2), 310 (2014).
N. V. Tokiy, V. V. Tokiy, A. N. Pilipenko, and N. E. Pis’menova, Phys. Solid State 56 (5), 1002 (2014).
V. A. Moskalenko, V. I. Betekhtin, B. K. Kardashev, A. G. Kadomtsev, A. R. Smirnov, R. V. Smolyanets, and M. V. Narykova, Phys. Solid State 56 (8), 1590 (2014).
S. V. Bobylev and I. A. Ovid’ko, Phys. Solid State 57 (10), 2059 (2015).
M. Jin, A. M. Minor, E. A. Stach, and J. W. Morris, Acta. Mater. 52, 5381 (2004).
W. A. Soer, J. T. M. De Hosson, A. M. Minor, J. W. Morris, and E. A. Stach, Acta Mater. 52, 5783 (2004).
M. Y. Gutkin and I. A. Ovid’ko, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 251916 (2005).
F. Sansoz and V. Dupont, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 111901 (2006).
D. Pan, T. G. Nieh, and M. W. Chen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 161922 (2006).
P. L. Gai, K. Zhang, and J. Weertman, Scr. Mater. 56, 25 (2007).
V. Dupont and F. Sansoz, Acta Mater. 56, 6013 (2008).
I. A. Ovid’ko, A. G. Sheinerman, and E. C. Aifantis, Acta Mater. 56, 2718 (2008).
T. J. Rupert, D. S. Gianola, Y. Gan, and K. J. Hemker, Science (Washington) 326, 1686 (2009).
S. Cheng, Y. Zhao, Y. Wang, Y. Li, X.-L. Wang, P. K. Liaw, and E. J. Lavernia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 255501 (2010).
S. V. Bobylev, N. F. Morozov, and I. A. Ovid’ko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 055504 (2010).
S. V. Bobylev, N. F. Morozov, and I. A. Ovid’ko, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter 84, 094103 (2011).
I. A. Ovid’ko, A. G. Sheinerman, and E. C. Aifantis, Acta Mater. 59, 5023 (2011).
S. V. Bobylev and I. A. Ovid’ko, Acta Mater. 88, 260 (2015).
Y. Lin, H. Wen, Y. Li, B. Wen, and E. J. Lavernia, Metall. Mater. Trans. B 45, 795 (2014).
Y. Lin, B. Xu, Y. Feng, and E. J. Lavernia, J. Alloys Compd. 596, 79 (2014).
K. Dám, and P. Lejcek, Mater. Charact. 76, 69 (2013).
Y. Lin, H. Wen, Y. Li, B. Wen, L. Wei, and E. J. La-vernia, Acta Mater. 82, 304 (2015).
T. Zálezák and A. Dlouhy, Acta Phys. Pol., A 122, 450 (2012).
I. A. Ovid’ko and A. G. Sheinerman, Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. 39, 99 (2014).
I. A. Ovid’ko and A. G. Sheinerman, J. Mater. Sci. 50, 4430 (2015).
Ya. V. Konakov, I. A. Ovid’ko, and A. G. Sheinerman, Mater. Phys. Mech. 24, 97 (2015).
S. V. Bobylev, M. Yu. Gutkin, and I. A. Ovid’ko, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 37, 269 (2004).
S. V. Bobylev, M. Yu. Gutkin, and I. A. Ovid’ko, Acta Mater. 52, 3793 (2004).
E. A. Rzhavtsev and M. Yu. Gutkin, Scr. Mater. 100, 102 (2015).
M. Yu. Gutkin and A. E. Romanov, J. Mech. Behav. Mater. 6, 275 (1996).
U. F. Kocks, A. S. Argon, and M. F. Ashby, Prog. Mater. Sci. 19, 1 (1975).
M. Yu. Gutkin, T. Ishizaki, S. Kuramoto, I. A. Ovid’ko, and N. V. Skiba, Int. J. Plast. 24, 1333 (2008).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © Ya.V. Konakov, I.A. Ovid’ko, A.G. Sheinerman, 2016, published in Fizika Tverdogo Tela, 2016, Vol. 58, No. 9, pp. 1757–1763.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Konakov, Y.V., Ovid’ko, I.A. & Sheinerman, A.G. Influence of coherent nanoinclusions on stress-driven migration of low-angle grain boundaries in nanocomposites. Phys. Solid State 58, 1819–1825 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063783416090195
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063783416090195