Advertisement

Physics of Particles and Nuclei

, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 330–332 | Cite as

Measurement of analyzing power for the reaction \(\vec p + CH_2\) at polarized proton momentum of 7.5 GeV/c (ALPOM2 proposal)

  • V. P. Balandin
  • A. E. Baskakov
  • S. N. Basilev
  • E. Brash
  • Yu. P. Bushuev
  • O. P. Gavrishchuk
  • V. V. Glagolev
  • M. K. Jones
  • M. G. Kadykov
  • M. Khandaker
  • D. A. Kirillov
  • Yu. T. Kiryushin
  • E. V. Kostyukhov
  • N. A. Kuzmin
  • A. N. Livanov
  • P. K. Manyakov
  • G. Martinska
  • M. Meziane
  • S. A. Movchan
  • J. Mušinsky
  • L. Pentchev
  • C. F. Perdrisat
  • N. M. PiskunovEmail author
  • A. A. Povtoreiko
  • V. Punjabi
  • P. A. Rukoyatkin
  • R. A. Shindin
  • A. V. Shutov
  • N. A. Shutova
  • I. M. Sitnik
  • V. M. Slepnev
  • I. V. Slepnev
  • S. Ya. Sychkov
  • E. Tomasi-Gustafsson
  • S. E. Vasiliev
  • A. V. Vishnevsky
  • A. I. Yukaev
  • J. Urban
  • B. Wojtsekhowski
Session 8. Future Facilities and Experiments

Abstract

An accurate data base for the analyzing power of thick CH2 analyzers for high energy protons has been at the basis of several research efforts in a number of laboratories. Starting in the late eighties such data were collected at SATURNE in Saclay, and with the Synchrophasotron in Dubna, and led to an extensive program of study of polarization phenomena in pd interaction, either backward elastic scattering or breakup [1–6]. At about the same time it became evident that measuring polarization observables in elastic ep was going to be the best approach to determine the form factors of the proton, G Ep and G Mp , as had been predicted by Akhiezer and Rekalo [7].

Keywords

Deuteron Beam Hadron Calorimeter Proton Momentum High Energy Proton Proton Form Factor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    L. S. Azhgirei et al., Phys. Lett. B 391, 22 (1997).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. S. Azhgirei et al., Phys. Lett. B 387, 37 (1996); Phys. Atom. Nucl. 61, 432 (1998) [Yad. Fiz. 61, 494 (1998)].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. Punjabi et al., Phys. Lett. B 350, 178 (1995).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Cheung et al., Phys. Lett. B 284, 210 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. Punjabi et al., Phys. Rev. C 39, 608 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    C. F. Perdrisat et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2840 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. I. Akhiezer and M. P. Rekalo, Sov. Phys.-Doklady 13, 572 (1968); A. I. Akhiezer and M. P. Rekalo, Sov. J. Part. Nucl. 3, 277 (1974).ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    V. Punjabi, C. F. Perdrisat et al., Phys. Rev. C 71, 055202 (2005); Phys. Rev. C. Erratum 71, 069902 (2005).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. J. R. Puckett, E. J. Brash, M. K. Jones, W. Luo, M. Meziane, L. Pentchev, C. F. Perdrisat, and V. Punjabi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 242301 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. J. R. Puckett, E. J. Brash, O. Gayou, M. K. Jones et al., arXiv:1102.5737.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. F. Perdrisat, V. Punjabi, M. Jones, E. Brash et al., Letter of Intent LOI12-06-103 (submitted to Jlab PAC30, 2006).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    E. Cisbani, L. Pentchev, C. Perdrisat, V. Punjabi, and B. Wojtsekhowski, JLab E12-07-109, 2007.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    L. S. Azhgirei et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 538, 431 (2005).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    O. Gayou et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 092301 (2002).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    H. Spinka et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 211, 239 (1983).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    N. V. Vlasov et al., Instruments and Experimental Techniques 49, 41 (2006).CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    V. P. Balandin et al., JINR Commun., P13-2008-196, Dubna.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. P. Balandin
    • 1
  • A. E. Baskakov
    • 1
  • S. N. Basilev
    • 1
  • E. Brash
    • 5
  • Yu. P. Bushuev
    • 1
  • O. P. Gavrishchuk
    • 1
  • V. V. Glagolev
    • 1
  • M. K. Jones
    • 4
  • M. G. Kadykov
    • 1
  • M. Khandaker
    • 3
  • D. A. Kirillov
    • 1
  • Yu. T. Kiryushin
    • 1
  • E. V. Kostyukhov
    • 1
  • N. A. Kuzmin
    • 1
  • A. N. Livanov
    • 1
  • P. K. Manyakov
    • 1
  • G. Martinska
    • 6
  • M. Meziane
    • 2
  • S. A. Movchan
    • 1
  • J. Mušinsky
    • 1
  • L. Pentchev
    • 4
  • C. F. Perdrisat
    • 2
  • N. M. Piskunov
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. A. Povtoreiko
    • 1
  • V. Punjabi
    • 3
  • P. A. Rukoyatkin
    • 1
  • R. A. Shindin
    • 1
  • A. V. Shutov
    • 1
  • N. A. Shutova
    • 1
  • I. M. Sitnik
    • 1
  • V. M. Slepnev
    • 1
  • I. V. Slepnev
    • 1
  • S. Ya. Sychkov
    • 1
  • E. Tomasi-Gustafsson
    • 7
  • S. E. Vasiliev
    • 1
  • A. V. Vishnevsky
    • 1
  • A. I. Yukaev
    • 1
  • J. Urban
    • 6
  • B. Wojtsekhowski
    • 4
  1. 1.Joint Institute for Nuclear ResearchDubna, Moscow regionRussia
  2. 2.The College of William and MaryWilliamsburgUSA
  3. 3.Norfolk State UniversityNorfolkUSA
  4. 4.Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator FacilityNewport NewsUSA
  5. 5.Christopher Newport University and TJNAFNewport NewsUSA
  6. 6.University of P.J. ŠafarikKošiceSlovak Republic
  7. 7.IRFU, SPhnCEA Saclay and IN2P3/IPN OrsayOrsayFrance

Personalised recommendations