Advertisement

Physics of Atomic Nuclei

, Volume 73, Issue 12, pp 2110–2115 | Cite as

Exposure of nuclear track emulsion to a mixed beam of relativistic 12N, 10C, and 7Be nuclei

  • R. R. Kattabekov
  • K. Z. Mamatkulov
  • D. A. Artemenkov
  • V. Bradnova
  • S. Vokál
  • D. M. Zhomurodov
  • P. I. Zarubin
  • I. G. Zarubina
  • Z. A. Igamkulov
  • N. V. Kondratieva
  • N. K. Kornegrutsa
  • D. O. Krivenkov
  • A. I. Malakhov
  • G. I. Orlova
  • N. G. Peresadko
  • N. G. Polukhina
  • P. A. Rukoyatkin
  • V. V. Rusakova
  • R. Stanoeva
  • M. Haiduc
  • S. P. Kharlamov
Elementary Particles and Fields Experiment

Abstract

A nuclear track emulsion was exposed to a mixed beam of relativistic 12N, 10C, and 7Be nuclei having a momentum of 2 GeV/c per nucleon. The beam was formed upon charge exchange processes involving 12C primary nuclei and their fragmentation. An analysis indicates that 10C nuclei are dominant in the beam and that 12N nuclei are present in it. The charge topology of relativistic fragments in the coherent dissociation of these nuclei is presented.

Keywords

Atomic Nucleus Charge Topology Dissociation Channel Unstable Nucleus Charge Exchange Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    N. P. Andreeva et al., Yad. Fiz. 68, 484 (2005) [Phys. At. Nucl. 68, 455 (2005)]; nucl-ex/0605015.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    The BECQUEREL Project, http://becquerel.jinr.ru/
  3. 3.
    N. G. Peresad’ko et al., Yad. Fiz. 70, 1266 (2007) [Phys. At. Nucl. 70, 1226 (2007)]; nucl-ex/0605014.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. A. Artemenkov et al., Yad. Fiz. 70, 1261 (2007) [Phys. At. Nucl. 70, 1222 (2007)]; nucl-ex/0605018.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Stanoeva et al., Yad. Fiz. 72, 731 (2009) [Phys. At. Nucl. 72, 690 (2009)]; arXiv: 0906.4220 [nucl-ex].Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Karabova et al., Yad. Fiz. 72, 329 (2009) [Phys. At. Nucl. 72, 300 (2009)]; D. A. Artemenkov, nuclex/0610023.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. O Krivenkov et al., AIP Conf. Proc. 1224, 224 (2010).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. A. Rukoyatkin, L. N. Komolov, R. I. Kukushkina, et al., Eur.Phys. J. ST 162, 267 (2008).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. V. Shchedrina et al., Yad. Fiz. 70, 1271 (2007) [Phys. At. Nucl. 70, 1230 (2007)]; nucl-ex/0605022.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. V. Belaga et al., Yad. Fiz. 58, 2014 (1995) [Phys. At. Nucl. 58, 1905 (1995)].Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. I. Adamovich et al., Yad. Fiz. 62, 1461 (1999) [Phys. At. Nucl. 62, 1378 (1999)].Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    The Nuclear Data Evaluation Project on Energy Levels of Light Nuclei, A = 5–20, http://www.tunl.duke.edu/NuclData/
  13. 13.
    Y. L. Parfenova and Ch. Leclercq-Willain, Phys. Rev. C 72, 054304 (2005).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Y. L. Parfenova and Ch. Leclercq-Willain, Phys. Rev. C 72, 024312 (2005).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. B. Wiringa, S. C. Pieper, J. Carlson, and V. R. Pandharipande, Phys. Rev. C 62, 014001 (2000).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. R. Kattabekov
    • 1
    • 2
  • K. Z. Mamatkulov
    • 1
    • 3
  • D. A. Artemenkov
    • 1
  • V. Bradnova
    • 1
  • S. Vokál
    • 4
  • D. M. Zhomurodov
    • 1
    • 3
  • P. I. Zarubin
    • 1
  • I. G. Zarubina
    • 1
  • Z. A. Igamkulov
    • 1
    • 3
  • N. V. Kondratieva
    • 1
  • N. K. Kornegrutsa
    • 1
  • D. O. Krivenkov
    • 1
  • A. I. Malakhov
    • 1
  • G. I. Orlova
    • 5
  • N. G. Peresadko
    • 5
  • N. G. Polukhina
    • 5
  • P. A. Rukoyatkin
    • 1
  • V. V. Rusakova
    • 1
  • R. Stanoeva
    • 1
    • 6
  • M. Haiduc
    • 7
  • S. P. Kharlamov
    • 5
  1. 1.Joint Institute for Nuclear ResearchDubna, Moscow oblastRussia
  2. 2.Institute for Physics and TechnologyUzbek Academy of SciencesTashkentRepublic of Uzbekistan
  3. 3.Dzhizak State Pedagogical InstituteDzhizakRepublic of Uzbekistan
  4. 4.University of P.J. ŠafárikKošiceSlovak Republic
  5. 5.Lebedev Institute of PhysicsRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  6. 6.South-West University Neofit RilskiBlagoevgradBulgaria
  7. 7.Institute for Space SciencesBucharest-MagureleRomania

Personalised recommendations