Physics of Atomic Nuclei

, Volume 73, Issue 4, pp 672–679 | Cite as

Beauty, charm, and FL at HERA: New data vs. Early predictions

Elementary Particles and Fields

Abstract

One of the well-known effects of the asymptotic freedom is splitting of the leading-log BFKL pomeron into a series of isolated poles in complex angular momentum plane. Following our earlier works we explore the phenomenological consequences of the emerging BFKL-Regge factorized expansion for the small-x charm (F2c) and beauty (F2b) structure functions of the proton. As we found earlier, the colordipole approach to the BFKL dynamics predicts uniquely decoupling of subleading hard BFKL exchanges from F2c at moderately large Q2. We predicted precocious BFKL asymptotics of F2c (x,Q2) with intercept of the rightmost BFKL pole αP(0) − 1 = ΔP ≈ 0.4. High-energy open beauty photo- and electroproduction probes the vacuum exchange at much smaller distances and detects significant corrections to the BFKL asymptotics coming from the subleading vacuum poles. In view of the accumulation of the experimental data on small −xF2c and F2b we extended our early predictions to the kinematical domain covered by new HERA measurements. Our structure functions obtained in 1999 agree well with the determination of both F2c and F2b by the H1 published in 2006 but contradict very recent (2008, preliminary)H1 results on F2b. We present also comparison of our early predictions for the longitudinal structure function FL with recent H1 data (2008) taken at very low Bjorken x. We comment on the electromagnetic corrections to the Okun-Pomeranchuk theorem.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    L. B. Okun, and I. Ya. Pomeranchuk, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 30, 307 (1956) [Sov. Phys. JETP 3, 307 (1956)].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. S. Fadin, E. A. Kuraev, and L. N. Lipatov, Phys. Lett. B 60, 50 (1975); E. A. Kuraev, L. N. Lipatov, and V. S. Fadin, Sov. Phys. JETP 44, 443 (1976); Sov. Phys. JETP 45, 199 (1977).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. N. Lipatov, Sov. Phys. JETP 63, 904 (1986).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. N. Gribov, B. L. Ioffe, I. Ya. Pomeranchuk, and A. P. Rudik, Sov. Phys. JETP 16, 220 (1963).ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    N. N. Nikolaev and V. R. Zoller, JETP Lett. 69, 103 (1999).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    N. N. Nikolaev, J. Speth, and V. R. Zoller, Phys. Lett. B 473, 157 (2000).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. N. Nikolaev, J. Speth, and V. R. Zoller, JETP 93, 957 (2001); Eur. Phys. J. C 22, 637 (2002).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. N. Nikolaev and V. R. Zoller, Phys. Lett. B 509, 283 (2001).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. R. Zoller, Phys. Lett. B 509, 69 (2001).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. N. Lipatov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 23, 338 (1976); E. A. Kuraev, L. N. Lipatov, and V. S. Fadin, Sov. Phys. JETP 44, 443 (1976); 45, 199 (1977); Ya. Ya. Balitsky and L. N. Lipatov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 28, 882 (1978).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. N. Nikolaev, B. G. Zakharov, and V. R. Zoller, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 105, 1498 (1994) [JETP 78, 806 (1994)].Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    N. N. Nikolaev and B.G. Zakharov, Phys. Lett. B 333, 250 (1994).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    N. N. Nikolaev and B.G. Zakharov, Phys. Lett. B 327, 157 (1994).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    N. N. Nikolaev and V. R. Zoller, JETP Lett. 69, 187 (1999).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    N. N. Nikolaev, B. G. Zakharov, and V. R. Zoller, JETP Lett. 66, 138 (1997).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. Ellis, H. Kowalski, and D. A. Ross, Phys. Lett. B 668, 51 (2008).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. Aktas et al. (H1 Collab.), Eur. Phys. J. C 45, 23 (2006).CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    H1 Collab. (preliminary), in Proc. of the 34th Intern. Conf. on High Energy Physics (ICHEP 2008), Philadelphia, 30 Jul.–5 Aug. 2008.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    F. D. Aaron et al. (H1 Collab.), Phys. Lett. B 665, 139 (2008).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    N. N. Nikolaev and B. G. Zakharov, Z. Phys. C 49, 607 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    N. N. Nikolaev, B. G. Zakharov, and V. R. Zoller, JETP Lett. 59, 6 (1994).ADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. D’Elia, A. Di Giacomo, and E. Meggiolaro, Phys. Rev. D 67, 114504 (2003).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. Nemchik, N. N. Nikolaev, E. Predazzi, B. G. Zakharov, and V. R. Zoller, JETP 86, 1054 (1998).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. V. Berezhnoy, V. V. Kiselev, and A. K. Likhoded, Phys. At. Nucl. 63, 1595 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    C. D. White and R. S. Thorne, Phys. Rev. D 74, 014002 (2006).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    S. P. Baranov, Phys. Rev. D 76, 034021 (2007); S. P. Baranov and N. P. Zotov, JETP Lett. 86, 435 (2007); S. P. Baranov, A. V. Lipatov, and N. P. Zotov, Eur. Phys. J. C 56, 371 (2008).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    J. Breitweg et al. (ZEUS Collab.), Phys. Lett. B 437, 432 (1998); C. Adloff et al. (H1 Collab.), Phys. Lett. B 483, 23 (2000).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    N. N. Nikolaev, Comments Nucl. Part. Phys. 21, 41 (1992); B. Z. Kopeliovich, J. Nemchik, N. N. Nikolaev, and B. G. Zakharov, Phys. Lett. B 309, 179 (1993); 324, 469 (1994); J. Nemchik, N. N. Nikolaev, and B. G. Zakharov, Phys. Lett. B 341, 228 (1994).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für KernphysikForschungszentrum JülichJülichGermany
  2. 2.L.D.Landau Institute for Theoretical PhysicsChernogolovkaRussia
  3. 3.Institute of Theoretical and Experimental PhysicsMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations