Physics of Atomic Nuclei

, Volume 72, Issue 8, pp 1363–1381 | Cite as

Paradoxes of neutrino oscillations

Open Access
Elementary Particles and Fields Theory

Abstract

Despite the theory of neutrino oscillations being rather old, some of its basic issues are still being debated in the literature. We discuss a number of such issues, including the relevance of the “same energy” and “same momentum” assumptions, the role of quantum-mechanical uncertainty relations in neutrino oscillations, the dependence of the coherence and localization conditions that ensure the observability of neutrino oscillations on neutrino energy and momentum uncertainties, the question of (in)dependence of the oscillation probabilities on the neutrino production and detection processes, and the applicability limits of the stationary-source approximation. We also develop a novel approach to calculation of the oscillation probability in the wave-packet approach, based on the summation/integration conventions different from the standard one, which allows a new insight into the “same energy” vs. “same momentum” problem. We also discuss a number of apparently paradoxical features of the theory of neutrino oscillations.

PACS numbers

14.60.Pq 

References

  1. 1.
    B. Pontecorvo, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 34, 247 (1958) [Sov. Phys. JETP 7, 172 (1958)].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa, and S. Sakata, Prog. Theor. Phys. 28, 870 (1962).MATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Strumia and F. Vissani, hep-ph/0606054; M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia and M. Maltoni, Phys. Rep. 460, 1 (2008) [arXiv:0704.1800 [hep-ph]].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Kh. Akhmedov, J. Kopp, and M. Lindner, J. High Energy Phys. 0805, 005 (2008) [arXiv:0802.2513 [hep-ph]].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. M. Bilenky, F. von Feilitzsch, and W. Potzel, arXiv:0804.3409 [hep-ph].Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Kh. Akhmedov, J. Kopp, and M. Lindner, arXiv:0803.1424 [hep-ph].Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. Kh. Akhmedov, J. High Energy Phys. 0709, 116 (2007) arXiv:0706.1216 [hep-ph].CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Eliezer and A. R. Swift, Nucl. Phys. B 105, 45 (1976).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Fritzsch and P. Minkowski, Phys. Lett. B 62, 72 (1976).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. M. Bilenky and B. Pontecorvo, Lett. Nuovo Cimento. 17, 569 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. M. Bilenky and B. Pontecorvo, Phys. Rep. 41, 225 (1978).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. J. Lipkin, Phys. Lett. B 348, 604 (1995) [hepph/9501269].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Y. Grossman and H. J. Lipkin, Phys. Rev. D 55, 2760 (1997) [hep-ph/9607201].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    L. Stodolsky, Phys. Rev. D 58, 036006 (1998) [hepph/9802387].Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. J. Lipkin, Phys. Lett. B 477, 195 (2000).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. G. Winter, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 30, 101 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    C. Giunti, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 16, 2363 (2001) [hepph/0104148].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. G. Cohen, S. L. Glashow, and Z. Ligeti, arXiv:0810.4602 [hep-ph].Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory (Westview, New York, 1995), Ch. 4.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. Nussinov, Phys. Lett. B 63, 201 (1976).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    B. Kayser, Phys. Rev. D 24, 110 (1981).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    C. Giunti, C. W. Kim, and U. W. Lee, Phys. Rev. D 44, 3635 (1991).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. Rich, Phys. Rev. D 48, 4318 (1993).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. D. Dolgov, A. Yu. Morozov, L. B. Okun, and M. G. Shchepkin, Nucl. Phys. B 502, 3 (1997) [hepph/9703241].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    C. Giunti and C. W. Kim, Phys. Rev. D 58, 017301 (1998) [hep-ph/9711363].Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    C. Y. Cardall, Phys. Rev. D 61, 073006 (2000) [hepph/9909332].Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    C. Giunti, J. High Energy Phys. 0211, 017 (2002) [hep-ph/0205014].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Y. Farzan and A. Yu. Smirnov, Nucl. Phys. B 805, 356 (2008) arXiv:0803.0495 [hep-ph].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    L. Visinelli and P. Gondolo, arXiv:0810.4132 [hepph].Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    M. Zralek, Acta Phys. Pol. B 29, 3925 (1998) [hepph/9810543]; M. Beuthe, Phys. Rep. 375, 105 (2003) [hep-ph/0109119].ADSGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    A. Yu. Smirnov, in Proc. of the 8th Rencontres de Blois: Neutrinos, Dark Matter and the Universe, Ed. by T. Stolarczyk et al. (Editions Frontiers, Gifsur-Yvette, 1997), p. 41.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    A. Yu. Smirnov, in Proc. of IPM School and Conf. on Lepton and Hadron Physics (IPM-LHP06), Tehran, Iran, 15–20 May 2006, Ed. by Y. Farzan, p. 0003 [hep-ph/0702061].Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    K. Kiers, S. Nussinov, and N. Weiss, Phys. Rev. D 53, 537 (1996) [hep-ph/9506271].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    M. Beuthe, Phys. Rev. D 66, 013003 (2002) [hepph/0202068].Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    W. Grimus and P. Stockinger, Phys. Rev. D 54, 3414 (1996) [hep-ph/9603430].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    I. Yu. Kobzarev, B. V. Martemyanov, L. B. Okun, and M. G. Shchepkin, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 35, 708 (1982).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    C. Giunti, C. W. Kim, J. A. Lee, and U. W. Lee, Phys. Rev. D 48, 4310 (1993) [hep-ph/9305276].CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    W. Grimus, P. Stockinger, and S. Mohanty, Phys. Rev. D 59, 013011 (1999) [hep-ph/9807442].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für KernphysikHeidelbergGermany
  2. 2.Russian Research Centre “Kurchatov Institute,”MoscowRussia
  3. 3.The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical PhysicsTriesteItaly
  4. 4.Institute for Nuclear ResearchRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations