Advertisement

Physics of Atomic Nuclei

, Volume 69, Issue 8, pp 1360–1365 | Cite as

Transfer, sequential decay, and quasi-free reactions induced by 18-MeV 6He beam on 6Li, 7Li, and 12C

  • M. Milin
  • S. Cherubini
  • T. Davinson
  • A. Di Pietro
  • P. Figuera
  • D. Miljanić
  • A. Musumarra
  • A. Ninane
  • A. N. Ostrowski
  • M. G. Pellegriti
  • A. C. Shotter
  • N. Soić
  • C. Spitaleri
  • M. Zadro
Proceedings of the National Conference on Nuclear Physics “Frontiers in the Physics of Nucleus” St. Petersburg State University, Russia June 28–July 1, 2005 Experimental Investigations of Nuclear Reactions

Abstract

The 6He + 6,7Li and 6He + 12C scattering and reactions have been studied using an 18-MeV 6He beam. Experimental results for the elastic scattering on all three targets are in fair agreement with optical model predictions, using the potentials found in the analysis of the 6Li scattering on the same targets and at close beam energies. Several two-body exit channels show clear signatures of a direct reaction mechanism allowing extraction of spectroscopic information. The measured angular distribution for the 6He + 6Li → α + 8Li reaction indicated close similarity between the α + 2n configuration in 6He and the α + d configuration in 6Li. The obtained results for α-particle pickup from both 6Li and 7Li give large values of α spectroscopic factors for some 10Be states, indicating their well-developed α + 6He cluster structure. The exotic two-proton pickup reaction (6He, 8Be) was studied, as well as two-neutron and triton transfer reactions. Quasi-free scattering of 6He on deuteron and α particle in 6Li was also observed. The sequential decay reactions 6He + 6Li → 6He + α + d, 6He + 6Li → 2α + t + n, 6He + 7Li → 6He + α + t, and 6He + 12C → 10Be + 2α were clearly seen, and α clustering of some states in 6,7Li, 8–10Be, and 14C was thus studied. Several new spectroscopic results obtained for some 10Be states support the existence of a molecule-like rotational band in 10Be with a very large moment of inertia.

PACS numbers

25.60.-t 25.60.Je 27.20.+n 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M. V. Zhukov, D. V. Danilin, D. V. Fedorov, et al., Phys. Rep. 231, 151 (1993).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    I. Tanihata et al., Phys. Lett. B. 160, 380 (1985).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. R. Tilley, C. Cheves, J. L. Godwin, et al., Nucl. Phys. A 708, 3 (2002).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Seya, M. Kohno, and S. Nagata, Prog. Theor. Phys. 65, 204 (1981).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Furutani, H. Kanada, T. Kaneko, et al., Prog. Theor. Phys., Suppl. 68, 193 (1980).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. von Oertzen, Z. Phys. A 354, 37 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. von Oertzen, Z. Phys. A 357, 355 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y. Kanada-En’yo, H. Horiuchi, and A. Dote, Phys. Rev. C 60 064304 (1999).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. Itagaki and S. Okabe, Phys. Rev. C 61, 044306 (2000).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Y. Ogawa, K. Arai, Y. Suzuki, and K. Varga, Nucl. Phys. A 673, 122 (2000).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. Itagaki, S. Hirose, T. Otsuka, et al., Phys. Rev. C 65, 044302 (2002).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. Hirose, N. Itagaki, T. Otsuka, et al., Prog. Theor. Phys., Suppl. 146, 565 (2002).ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Milin et al., Nucl. Phys. A 753, 263 (2005).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Milin et al., Europhys. Lett. 48, 616 (1999).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Milin et al., Nucl. Phys. A 730, 285 (2004).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Milin et al., Nucl. Phys. A 746, 183c (2004).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Milin et al., Phys. Rev. C 70, 044603 (2004).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. Milin, PhD. Thesis (University of Zagreb, 2003).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    D. Darquennes et al., Phys. Rev. C 42, R804 (1999).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Miljanić, M. Milin, et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 447, 544 (2000).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    T. Davinson et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 454, 350 (2000).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    V. I. Zagrebaev, in Proceedings of the Symposium on Nuclear Clusters, Rauischholzhausen, Germany, 2002, Ed. by R. Jolos and W. Scheid (EP Systema, 2003), p. 23.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    K. W. Potthast et al., Nucl. Phys. A 614, 95 (1997).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    K. W. Potthast et al., Nucl. Phys. A 629, 656 (1998).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    D. E. Trcka, A. D. Frawley, K. W. Kemper, et al., Phys. Rev. C 41, 2134 (1990).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    K. Bethge, C. M. Fou, and R. W. Zurmühle, Nucl. Phys. A 123, 521 (1969).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    J. E. Poling, E. Norbeck, and R. R. Carlson, Phys. Rev. C 13, 648 (1976).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    T. Matsumoto, E. Hiyama, K. Ogata, et al., Phys. Rev. C 70, 061601 (2004).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    I. J. Thompson, Comput. Phys. Rep. 7, 167 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    H. G. Bingham, K. W. Kemper, and N. R. Fletcher, Nucl. Phys. A 175, 374 (1971).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    K. I. Kubo and M. Hiratam, Nucl. Phys. A 187, 186 (1972).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    K. Rusek and K. W. Kemper, Phys. Rev. C 61, 034608 (2000).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    A. T. Rudchik, et al., Nucl. Phys. A 609, 147 (1996).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    M. Milin et al., in preparation.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    J. A. Liendo, N. Curtis, D. D. Caussyn, et al., Phys. Rev. C 65, 034317 (2002).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    N. Soić et al., Europhys. Lett. 34, 7 (1996).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    N. Curtis et al., Phys. Rev. C 64, 044604 (2001).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    N. Curtis et al., Phys. Rev. C 70, 014305 (2004).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    N. Soić, M. Freer, L. Donadille, et al., Phys. Rev. C 68, 014321 (2003).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    W. von Oertzen, H. G. Bohlen, M. Milin, et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 21, 193 (2004).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    T. Kobayashi, K. Yoshida, A. Ozawa, et al., Nucl. Phys. A 616, 223c (1997).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    L. V. Chulkov et al., Nucl. Phys. A (in press).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    M. Jain, P. G. Roos, H. G. Pugh, and H. D. Holmgren, Nucl. Phys. A 153, 49 (1970).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    R. E. Warner, A. Okihana, M. Fujiwara, et al., Phys. Rev. C 45, 2328 (1992).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    A. Okihana et al., Nucl. Phys. A 549, 1 (1992).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    D. Miljanić, M. Milin, et al., in preparation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Milin
    • 1
  • S. Cherubini
    • 2
  • T. Davinson
    • 3
  • A. Di Pietro
    • 3
  • P. Figuera
    • 4
  • D. Miljanić
    • 1
  • A. Musumarra
    • 2
    • 4
  • A. Ninane
    • 2
  • A. N. Ostrowski
    • 3
  • M. G. Pellegriti
    • 4
  • A. C. Shotter
    • 3
  • N. Soić
    • 1
  • C. Spitaleri
    • 4
  • M. Zadro
    • 1
  1. 1.Ruder Bošković InstituteZagrebCroatia
  2. 2.Institut de Physique NucléaireUniversité Catholique de LouvainLouvain-la-NeuveBelgium
  3. 3.Department of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
  4. 4.INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Sud and Università di CataniaCataniaItaly

Personalised recommendations