Integrated Cross Sections of High-Energy e+e Pair Electroproduction by an Electron in an Atomic Field

Nuclei, Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Astrophysics
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

The integrated cross sections of e+e pair electroproduction by an ultrarelativistic electron in an atomic field are studied. The importance of various contributions to the integrated cross sections is discussed. The Coulomb corrections have turned out to make a large contribution to both differential and integrated cross sections even at moderate values of the nuclear charge number. The interaction of the electron emitting a virtual photon with the atomic field is shown to contribute significantly to the cross sections differential with respect to the electron transverse momentum. However, this interaction affects only slightly the cross section differential only with respect to the positron transverse momentum.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    H. Bhabha, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 152, 559 (1935).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. Racah, Nuovo Cim. 4, 112 (1937).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. M. Block, D. T. King, and M. Wada, Phys. Rev. 96, 1627 (1954).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. Murota, A. Veda, and H. Tanaka, Progr. Theor. Phys. (Kyoto) 16, 482 (1956).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. G. Johnson, Phys. Rev. 140, 1005 (1965).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Brodsky and S. Ting, Phys. Rev. 145, 1018 (1966).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. D. Bjorken and M. Chen, Phys. Rev. 154, 1335 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Henry, Phys. Rev. 154, 1534 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Homma, A. Itano, K. Nishikawa, and M. Hayashi, Proc. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 3, 1230 (1974).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. A. Krachkov and A. I. Milstein, Phys. Rev. A 93, 062120 (2016).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. I. Nikishov and N. V. Pichkurov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 35, 561 (1982).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. Yu. Ivanov, E. A. Kuraev, A. Schiller, and V. G. Serbo, Phys. Lett. B 442, 453 (1998).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. Segev and J. C. Wells, Phys. Rev. A 57, 1849 (1998).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. J. Baltz and L. McLerran, Phys. Rev. C 58, 1679 (1998).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    U. Eichmann, J. Reinhardt, S. Schramm, and W. Greiner, Phys. Rev. A 59, 1223 (1999).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. N. Lee and A. I. Milstein, Phys. Rev. A 61, 032103 (2000).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    P. A. Krachkov and A. I. Milstein, Phys. Lett. B 771, 5 (2017).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    P. A. Krachkov, R. N. Lee, and A. I. Milstein, Phys. Usp. 59, 619 (2016).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. N. Lee and A. I. Milstein, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 109, 968 (2009).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    R. N. Lee, A. I. Milstein, V. M. Strakhovenko, and O. Ya. Schwarz, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 100, 1 (2005).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussia

Personalised recommendations